PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9799763

Simplified interpretative format for assessing test interference: studies with hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier solutions.

S C Kazmierczak·P G Catrou·D Boudreau
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Substances such as hemoglobin that interfere with analytical processes are recognized as a frequent source of error in laboratory medicine. Standard guidelines for assessment of test interferences assume that interference effects are not related to the concentration of the analyte being measured. However, previous investigations have demonstrated that interference effects can be markedly different, depending on the concentrations of interferent and analyte within the specimen. An experimental protocol for investigating these different types of interference effects has been developed. This protocol utilizes an orthogonally arranged matrix with progressively increasing concentrations of analyte and interferent. Evaluation of the measured analyte concentrations in specimens within the matrix using multiple regression analysis allows the magnitude, direction, and significance of each type of interference to be determined. Unfortunately, implementation of the interference data derived from the multiple regression analysis for judging the clinical acceptability of test results when an interferent is present is difficult. We describe a two-dimensional graphical format for evaluating the clinical acceptability of test results, based on criteria established under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, in specimens containing hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier solutions.

Explore related subjects

AspirinBilirubinBlood SubstitutesCalciumCholesterolHemoglobinsHumansPotassiumQuality ControlRegression AnalysisJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S C Kazmierczak, P G Catrou, D Boudreau. 1998. Simplified interpretative format for assessing test interference: studies with hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier solutions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9799763/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can assess stent geometry more accurately than angiography. Several studies have demonstrated that the degree of stent expansion as measured by IVUS directly correlated to clinical outcome. However, it is unclear if routine ultrasound guidance of stent implantation improves clinical outcome as compared with angiographic guidance alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CRUISE (Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion) study, a multicenter study IVUS substudy of the Stent Anti-thrombotic Regimen Study, was designed to assess the impact of IVUS on stent deployment in the high-pressure era. Nine centers were prospectively assigned to stent deployment with the use of ultrasound guidance and 7 centers to angiographic guidance alone with documentary (blinded) IVUS at the conclusion of the procedure. A total of 525 patients were enrolled with completed quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative coronary ultrasound, and clinical events adjudicated at 9 months for 499 patients. The IVUS-guided group had a larger minimal lumen diameter (2.9+/-0.4 versus 2.7+/-0. 5 mm, P<0.001) by quantitative coronary angiography and a larger minimal stent area (7.78+/-1.72 versus 7.06+/-2.13 mm(2), P<0.001) by quantitative coronary ultrasound. Target vessel revascularization, defined as clinically driven repeat interventional or surgical therapy of the index vessel at 9 month-follow-up, occurred significantly less frequently in the IVUS-guided group (8.5% versus 15.3%, P<0.05; relative reduction of 44%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that ultrasound guidance of stent implantation may result in more effective stent expansion compared with angiographic guidance alone.

Aspirin↗