PubMed · 9803916
Comparative measurements between a new logging tool and a reference instrument.
Abstract
Measurements were performed on reference samples (D2O-H2O mixtures) and on highly heterogeneous rocks (Vosges sandstone) with a new logging tool designed to give access to a high spatial resolution, below 1.5 cm on the vertical scale, for a toroidal sensitive volume of 20 cm3. The results were compared to measurements obtained on a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment working at the same frequency (4.3 MHz). T2 differences as high as 30% were observed for the reference samples; the shortest values were obtained with the logging tool. Porosity profiles of the rock samples were also compared to reference profiles obtained with a conventional computed tomography (CT) scanner. Both nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements underevaluate porosity by 2-4% for short T2 values (< 10 ms).
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Locatelli, H Mathieu, S Bobroff, G Guillot, B Zinszner. Comparative measurements between a new logging tool and a reference instrument.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0730-725x(98)00047-2
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.