PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9809886

Current issues in reperfusion therapy.

Abstract

With the establishment of thrombosis as the cause of myocardial infarction, the pivotal role of thrombolytics and primary angioplasty has evolved. Large randomized trials with innovative methodologies have examined the role of these reperfusion therapies in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy decreases mortality in a broad group of patients with acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO trial established intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) used in combination with intravenous heparin as the most effective thrombolytic therapy. Importantly, the time to achieve reperfusion is crucial to the mortality benefit observed, and rapid attainment of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial grade 3 flow is achieved in only approximately 55% of patients who receive thrombolytics. Reocclusion, cellular damage, and microvascular dysfunction may contribute to less than optimal results. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) may be the preferred method of acute reperfusion therapy based on higher rates of TIMI grade 3 flow and lower rates of reocclusion and recurrent myocardial infarction. However, marked variation exists in outcomes and utilization rates among individual institutions, and the benefits of PTCA have not been consistently maintained at 6 months. The use of stents and anticoagulants may improve results, and pre-PTCA strategies also are under investigation. Limitations remain in the efficacy of current reperfusion therapies, supporting the search for improved thrombolytic agents, primary angioplasty, stents, and antithrombotics with the goal of improving TIMI 3 flow rates and achieving reperfusion more rapidly.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B J Gersh. 1998-10-22. Current issues in reperfusion therapy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00659-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Candidate genetic markers and the risk of restenosis after coronary angioplasty.

The aim of the present study was to test for possible associations between candidate gene polymorphisms and the risk of restenosis and recurrent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) without stenting. We followed up 511 PTCA patients, and restenosis and recurrent restenosis were defined according to angiographical criteria. Genotyping of the beta-fibrinogen -455 G/A, glycoprotein (GP) IIIa PlA1/PlA2, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G, factor V Leiden 1691 G/A, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) -238 G/A, TNFalpha -308 G/A, interleukin (IL)-1alpha -889 C/T, IL-1beta -511 C/T, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677 C/T and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) 4 b/a gene polymorphisms was performed by PCR and restriction-fragment-length-polymorphism-based techniques. One hundred and sixty patients (31.3%) developed restenosis and in 130 of these patients, of whom 123 were available for analysis, a second PTCA without stenting was performed. Of these patients, 35 (28.5%) developed recurrent restenosis. None of the investigated genotypes were associated with the risk of restenosis or recurrent restenosis after PTCA. The degree of stenosis before and immediately after PTCA and the severity of the lesion were independent predictors for restenosis after PTCA. In conclusion, there was no association between the beta-fibrinogen -455 G/A, GP IIIa PlA1/A2, PAI-1 4G/5G, factor V Leiden 1691 G/A, TNFalpha -238 G/A, TNFalpha -308 G/A, IL-1alpha -889 C/T, the IL-1beta -511 C/T, MTHFR 677 C/T and eNOS 4 b/a gene polymorphisms and the risk of restenosis after PTCA as well as recurrent restenosis after repeated PTCA.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Genetic risk markers for post-angioplasty restenosis: what should we expect?

Genetic risk markers for coronary artery disease and associated phenotypes, such as restenosis after angioplasty, have the potential to be valuable to the individual, but even more so in facilitating an understanding of causal factors in the disease, and thereby the development of novel preventative and therapeutic strategies. In this issue of Clinical Science, Völzke and co-workers were unable to show association of a panel of candidate polymorphisms with restenosis, but their study has highlighted the need for even larger studies, as well as the potential benefits of finding causal genetic variation.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗