PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9815426

Homeopathic Resistant Malaria.

Abstract

Multiresistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria is a major threat to travelers to subSaharan Africa. However, even if chemoprophylaxis does not prevent clinical malaria in some individuals, it does lead to a reduction in the severity of the disease.1 In Sweden, we have recently seen five patients with malaria (three due to P. ovale and two due to P. falciparum) who have used homeopathic drugs for prophylaxis during visits to West Africa. We are concerned about this incidence and afraid that reduced confidence in modern medical malaria prophylaxis will encourage some individuals to try totally ineffective alternatives. Three women (57, 40, and 39 years old) visited Guinea Conacry in January 1995 as members of a group of 24 persons learning about African dances. The 57-year-old woman took mefloquine irregularly but vomited each time after intake. She also used Spenglersan M, which is a homeopathic drug that is administered (one drop daily in the bend of the arm) as malaria prophylaxis. The two other women used Spenglersan M only. They all fell ill with P. ovale malaria despite ongoing intake. Spenglersan M is said to contain both antigen from P. falciparum and antibodies against the parasite diluted to 1:1,000,000,000 concentration. The fourth case was a 26-year-old man who visited Ghana and Burkina Faso in October and November 1994. He used China D-6 for prophylaxis. This is a homeopathic preparation of the bark from the cinchona tree. Not even trace amounts of quinine were found in the tablets with a very sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method.2 Four days after returning from Africa he fell ill with P. falciparum malaria and received sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment. After clinical relapse (RI), mefloquine was given and the patient was eventually cured. The fifth case was a 34-year-old woman admitted to hospital because of P. falciparum malaria after a visit to Guinea Conacry in January 1995. She had taken a homeopathic drug, Charaka comp 118, as prophylaxis. The drug is said to contain different extracts from herbs diluted 30 times. At first she refused to stay in hospital, but 2 days later she was readmitted and treated in the intensive care unit because of severe malaria with hypotonia and anemia. She had hyperparasitemia with 23% infected erythrocytes. Exchange transfusion was done, quinine was given, and the patient recovered without sequelae. The mortality is about 1% in people with P. falciparum infection.3 We therefore urge the readers to stand up against the dangerous use of homeopathic drugs and instead motivate travelers to use protective malaria prophylaxis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Carlsson, L Bergqvist, U Hellgren. 1996-03-01. Homeopathic Resistant Malaria.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8305.1996.tb00700.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗