PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9819580

Structured task analysis in complex domains.

Abstract

This paper describes the application of MUSE, a human factors structured design method, to the design of systems supporting the work of air traffic controllers at European airport control towers. The paper illustrates the derivation of a generalized task model starting from the analyses performed at four airports and the construction of the composite task model of the future system. Other important concerns of the work are the harmonization of the different tools in the airport control tower and the assessment of the impact of these tools on the human operators. The potentialities and limitations of applying the method are discussed in particular with respect to the complexity of the domain and the nonstandard features of the air traffic control as a MUSE application. Indeed, air traffic management is widely acknowledged as a complex domain to design for, and the documented application of human factors structured methods to design are all referred to the modelling of worksystems (as opposed to working positions or workstations) with a single operator. In the present application one has multiple operators and multiple design goals (design, harmonization, assessment). The work presented is a contribution to the extension and better definition of structured methods and their applicability to the analysis of complex domains.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Marti. 1998. Structured task analysis in complex domains.. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398186126

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Refining and blending of aviation turbine fuels.

Aviation turbine fuels (jet fuels) are similar to other petroleum products that have a boiling range of approximately 300F to 550F. Kerosene and No.1 grades of fuel oil, diesel fuel, and gas turbine oil share many similar physical and chemical properties with jet fuel. The similarity among these products should allow toxicology data on one material to be extrapolated to the others. Refineries in the USA manufacture jet fuel to meet industry standard specifications. Civilian aircraft primarily use Jet A or Jet A-1 fuel as defined by ASTM D 1655. Military aircraft use JP-5 or JP-8 fuel as defined by MIL-T-5624R or MIL-T-83133D respectively. The freezing point and flash point are the principle differences between the finished fuels. Common refinery processes that produce jet fuel include distillation, caustic treatment, hydrotreating, and hydrocracking. Each of these refining processes may be the final step to produce jet fuel. Sometimes blending of two or more of these refinery process streams are needed to produce jet fuel that meets the desired specifications. Chemical additives allowed for use in jet fuel are also defined in the product specifications. In many cases, the customer rather than the refinery will put additives into the fuel to meet their specific storage or flight condition requirements.

Aviation

[Quantitative ranges and methods of evaluation of occupational reliability of aviation specialists].

The authors present concept of occupational reliability of an operating human. The concept is based on systemic approach to analysis of erroneous acts as results of stochasticity of inner human traits and outer interferences. The authors justify universal, systemic criterion to analyze reliability of occupational activities (potential unreliability of acts). The criterion helped to solve practical problems of quantitative evaluation and forecast of outer influence on occupational reliability of a pilot. The criterion is adequate for analysis of "risk-profit" correlation to optimize material expenses among the components of "human-machine" system being under elaboration, preparation and in use.

Aviation

[Methodologic approaches to solving problems concerning development and improvement of means protecting against detrimental ecological factors].

The article covers scientific and applied aspects of ergonomic (physiologic, hygienic, engineering and psychologic) improvement of protective and salvage means for aviation specialists in up-to-date ecologic circumstances. The authors justify and present a concept of higher ergonomic efficiency of those means when exposed to combined hazards. The concept suggests possibility of considerably increased occupational readiness and occupational health in aviation specialists owing to more complete consideration of operator's personal characteristics.

Aviation