PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9822589

Replication errors: cha(lle)nging the genome.

Abstract

Since the discovery of a link between the malfunction of post-replicative mismatch correction and hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, the study of this complex repair pathway has received a great deal of attention. Our understanding of the mammalian system was facilitated by conservation of the main protagonists of this process from microbes to humans. Thus, biochemical experiments carried out with Escherichia coli extracts helped us to identify functional human homologues of the bacterial mismatch repair proteins, while the genetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae aided our understanding of the phenotypes of human cells deficient in mismatch correction. Today, mismatch repair is no longer thought of solely as the mechanism responsible for the correction of replication errors, whose failure demonstrates itself in the form of a mutator phenotype and microsatellite instability. Malfunction of this process has been implicated also in mitotic and meiotic recombination, drug and ionizing radiation resistance, transcription-coupled repair and apoptosis. Elucidation of the roles of mismatch repair proteins in these transduction pathways is key to our understanding of the role of mismatch correction in human cancer. However, in order to unravel all the complexities involved in post-replicative mismatch correction, we need to know the cast and the roles of the individual players. This brief treatise provides an overview of our current knowledge of the biochemistry of this process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Jiricny. 1998-11-16. Replication errors: cha(lle)nging the genome.. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj%2F17.22.6427

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Base pair mismatch recognition using plasmon resonant particle labels.

We demonstrate the use of silver plasmon resonant particles (PRPs), as reporter labels, in a microarray-based DNA hybridization assay in which we screen for a known polymorphic site in the breast cancer gene BRCA1. PRPs (40-100 nm in diameter) image as diffraction-limited points of colored light in a standard microscope equipped with dark-field illumination, and can be individually identified and discriminated against background scatter. Rather than overall intensity, the number of PRPs counted in a CCD image by a software algorithm serves as the signal in these assays. In a typical PRP hybridization assay, we achieve a detection sensitivity that is approximately 60 x greater than that achieved by using fluorescent labels. We conclude that single particle counting is robust, generally applicable to a wide variety of assay platforms, and can be integrated into low-cost and quantitative detection systems for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis.

Base Pair Mismatch↗

The role of polymerase eta in somatic hypermutation determined by analysis of mutations in a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum variant.

To determine the possible role of polymerase eta (pol eta) in somatic hypermutation of B cells, a mutational analysis of 24 nonproductive rearrangements from a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum variant with a defect in pol eta was conducted. Although the mutational frequency of A and T bases decreased in WA (A/T, A) motifs, regardless of their RGYW (purine, G; pyrimidine, A/T) context, the overall mutational frequency of A or T bases was not affected. Moreover, the overall mutational frequency of the sequences examined was not decreased. There was an apparent increase in the number of insertions and deletions. The results are consistent with the conclusion that pol eta specifically targets WA motifs. However, its overall contribution to the somatic hypermutational process does not appear to be indispensable and in its absence other mechanisms maintain mutational activity.

Base Pair Mismatch↗

Identifying novel transcripts and novel genes in the human genome by using novel SAGE tags.

The number of genes in the human genome is still a controversial issue. Whereas most of the genes in the human genome are said to have been physically or computationally identified, many short cDNA sequences identified as tags by use of serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) do not match these genes. By performing experimental verification of more than 1,000 SAGE tags and analyzing 4,285,923 SAGE tags of human origin in the current SAGE database, we examined the nature of the unmatched SAGE tags. Our study shows that most of the unmatched SAGE tags are truly novel SAGE tags that originated from novel transcripts not yet identified in the human genome, including alternatively spliced transcripts from known genes and potential novel genes. Our study indicates that by using novel SAGE tags as probes, we should be able to identify efficiently many novel transcripts/novel genes in the human genome that are difficult to identify by conventional methods.

Base Pair Mismatch↗