PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9834774

Referrals for depression by primary care physicians. A pilot study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication between primary care physicians (PCPs) and mental health providers (MHPs) is integral to the management of depressive disorders. Our study investigated referrals from PCPs to MHPs in a rural research network. METHODS: From April 1997 to September 1997, 5 family physicians tracked 6 weeks of referrals for depression and non-mental health problems and assessed the outcomes of these referrals after 3 months. The referrals were characterized by the nature and extent of communication between the PCP and the MHP and by the effectiveness of the consultation. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (44 with non-mental health disorders and 23 with depressive disorders) were identified and followed. Analysis of the initial referral process showed that the referring physicians felt a greater sense of urgency for the referrals for depression. Written evidence of the referral in the patient's chart at the 3-month survey was more common for non-mental health disorders. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that there are communication barriers between PCPs and their mental health colleagues. Enhanced communication might improve satisfaction with the referral process. The details of the referral process need further study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D N Little, C Hammond, D Kollisch, B Stern, R Gagne, A J Dietrich. 1998. Referrals for depression by primary care physicians. A pilot study.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9834774/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗