PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9838755

Assessing school readiness for a practice arrangement using decision tree methodology.

Abstract

Decision-tree methodology provides a systematic approach for schools to use in examining their own situation to determine if a faculty practice arrangement is appropriate for their particular school at this particular time. Questions in the decision tree address mission, faculty interest, administrative support, a practice plan, and practice models. Specific questions in the decision tree include the following: Does the institutional mission include service/practice? Does the college/school mission include practice? Does the college/school have a critical mass of faculty interested in practice? Does college/school administration support practice? Does a critical mass of faculty desire a faculty practice plan? Can faculty and administration work together to produce a mutually beneficial practice arrangement? Do faculty and administration desire to operate their own practice arrangement? Is there an identified need for nursing services that can be met by the college/school? Does the internal and external environment support the college/school operating a practice? Do internal or external organizations desire the talents/expertise of faculty members? Schools frequently evaluate two models, the Integration/Nursing Center Model and the Organizational Contracting/Entrepreneurship Model, for their specific risks and benefits. Critical to the success of any practice arrangement is that there be congruency between the school's allocation of human resources and its reward system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S E Barger. Assessing school readiness for a practice arrangement using decision tree methodology.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8755-7223(98)80073-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues-such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials-are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

Decision Making, Organizational↗