PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 984387

Tutor-student interaction in the operating theatre.

N S Paget·T F Lambert
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper examines the view that productive teaching in the operating theatre requires a recognition of the unique set of factors which may influence the process of communication. For tutor-student interaction to occur in a productive manner, the tutor's behaviour will need to be modified to suit the demands of the other tasks in which both tutor and student are involved. The particular value of recognizing the role of nonverbal behaviours during interaction is discussed, with the use of specific examples related to the positioning of the tutor and student, and their use of facial expression, the eyes and voice.

Explore related subjects

AnesthesiologyAustraliaEducation, Medical, GraduateInterprofessional RelationsOperating RoomsTeachingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N S Paget, T F Lambert. 1976. Tutor-student interaction in the operating theatre.. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x7600400407

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗