PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9845582

Update: total versus partial laparoscopic fundoplication.

Abstract

Since the introduction of Nissen fundoplicaton in 1956, there has been concern about the incidence of troublesome mechanical complications, which has necessitated several modifications reducing the overall incidence to around 15%. Increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of Nissen fundoplication has revealed that these complications are associated with a supracompetent high pressure zone (HPZ) which relaxes incompletely on swallowing and is associated with abolition of gas reflux and physiological acid reflux. Partial fundoplication procedures, which augment various constituents of the valvuloplasty component of competence and utilise a lesser degree of fundoplication, are associated with a very low incidence of mechanical complications, but debate has ensued that reflux control may be suboptimal and less durable than after Nissen fundoplication. However, several good, objective comparative studies and three prospective randomised trials have confirmed that a well conducted partial fundoplication procedure is at least as effective and durable in reflux control as Nissen fundoplication, whilst being associated with a lower incidence of mechanical complications. The debate has intensified since the advent of laparoscopic fundoplication, as several reports have highlighted the increased incidence of mechanical complications following Nissen fundoplication when performed laparoscopically compared with the open approach, with a higher incidence of impaired HPZ relaxation, believed to be associated with altered geometry and other factors inherent in laparoscopic fundoplication. This has resulted in re-operation rates for complications of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication of 1-7%, and in the laparoscopic era, mechanical complications have overtaken recurrent reflux as the principal reason for revisional fundoplication. Several non-randomised series have shown that laparoscopic partial fundoplication procedures are associated with a similarly low incidence of mechanical complications and a negligible re-operation rate as at open operation, with retention of physiologial HPZ relaxation. These factors have resulted in increasing deployment of partial fundoplication procedures, and increasing support for the 'tailored' approach to anti-reflux surgery. Several prospective randomised studies between laparoscopic partial and total fundoplication procedures are currently in progress, and early results favour partial fundoplication because of the considerably lower incidence of mechanical complications. The continuance of these studies, as well as those underway which compare different partial fundoplication procedures and include economic and quality-of-life assessment, should enable the rational choice of the most appropriate laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure to be placed on a firm scientific footing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Watson. 1998. Update: total versus partial laparoscopic fundoplication.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000018594

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Results of a randomized trial of HERMES-assisted versus non-HERMES-assisted laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Speech recognition technology is a recent development in minimally invasive surgery. This study was designed to assess the impact of HERMES on operating room efficiency and user satisfaction. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux operations by surgeons experienced in minimally invasive surgery were randomized to HERMES-assisted or standard laparoscopic operations. The variables of interest were circulating nurse's time spent adjusting devices that are voice-controlled by HERMES, number of adjustments to devices requested, and surgeon and nurse satisfaction measured on a scale from 1 (dissatisfied) to 10 (satisfied). RESULTS: A total of 30 cases were studied. In the non-HERMES cases, nurses were interrupted to make device adjustments an average of 15.3 times per case versus 0.33 times per case in the with-HERMES cases (p < 0.01). The interruptions during the non-HERMES cases averaged 4.35 min per case versus 0.16 min per case in the with-HERMES cases (p = 0.03). Average satisfaction scores for HERMES operations as opposed to non-HERMES operations were 9.2 versus 5.3 for nurses (p < 0.01) and 9.0 versus 5.1 for surgeons (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Physician and nurse acceptance of HERMES was very high because of the smoother interruption-free environment.

Fundoplication↗