PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9847482

A method of scoring automated visual fields to determine field constriction causing blindness.

Abstract

Blindness is usually defined by visual acuity criteria. Patients with markedly constricted visual fields are visually impaired even if they have good visual acuity. To our knowledge, no standardised criteria exist to determine the extent of constriction for fields done with the currently used automated static perimetry. The purpose of this study was to suggest a simple method to do so which would help in determining blindness due to field constriction. We reviewed a number of constricted visual fields obtained with Humphrey automated static perimetry. The central 30 degrees field was divided into six concentric zones. By trial and error, we devised criteria for defining visual field constriction based on absolute loss of sensitivity (< or = 0 dB) and relative loss of sensitivity (< or = 5 dB). We suggest that if a zone has at least 75% test points < or = 0 dB and no point > 10 dB, it be considered to have absolute loss of sensitivity for the purpose of defining visual field blindness. Two exceptions to this are also suggested to prevent this criterion from becoming too rigid. Examples are shown to demonstrate application of these criteria in defining blindness due to visual field constriction to < 10 degrees as suggested by the World Health Organization. Standardised determination of visual field constriction with automated perimetry could be useful in more accurate estimation of blindness in surveys, as well as in assessing eligibility for being classified as blind for legal benefits.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Dandona, A Nanda. 1998. A method of scoring automated visual fields to determine field constriction causing blindness.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9847482/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Lack of NPHP2 mutations in a newborn infant with Joubert syndrome-related disorder presenting as end-stage renal disease.

A newborn infant with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to nephronophthisis (NPHP) developed episodes of tachypnea, alternating with apnea, and abnormal eye movements. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the midbrain demonstrated the characteristic appearance of molar tooth sign on axial images, consistent with the diagnosis of Joubert syndrome (JBTS). The DNA sequence analysis of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected no mutations in the NPHP2 (INVS) gene in this child, suggesting that new mutant genes might be responsible for the early onset of ESRD in infantile NPHP with features of JBTS.

Blindness↗

Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Nakuru district, Kenya.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of avoidable blindness in > or =50-year-olds in Nakuru district, Kenya, and to evaluate the Rapid Assessment for Avoidable Blindness (RAAB), a new methodology to measure the magnitude and causes of blindness. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-six clusters of 50 people 50 years or older were selected by probability proportionate to size sampling of clusters. Households within clusters were selected through compact segment sampling. Three thousand seven hundred eighty-four eligible subjects were selected, of whom 3503 (92.6%) were examined. METHODS: Participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination in their homes by an ophthalmologist, including measurement of visual acuity (VA) with a tumbling-E chart and the diagnosis of the principal cause of visual impairment. Those who had undergone cataract surgery were questioned about the details of the operation and their satisfaction with surgery. Those who were visually impaired from cataract were asked why they had not gone for surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity and principal cause of VA<6/18. RESULTS: The prevalence of bilateral blindness (presenting VA < 3/60) was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5%-2.4%), and prevalence of bilateral visual impairment (VA of <6/18-> or =6/60) was 5.8% (95% CI, 4.8%-6.8%) in the sample. Definite avoidable causes of blindness (i.e., cataract, refractive error, trachoma, and corneal scarring) were responsible for 69.6% of bilateral blindness and 74.9% of bilateral visual impairment. Cataract was the major cause of blindness (42.0%) and visual impairment (36.0%). The cataract surgical coverage was high, with 78% of those with bilateral cataract who needed surgery having had surgery at VA<3/60. The quality of surgery was of concern because 22% of the 222 eyes that had undergone cataract surgery had VA<6/60 with best correction. The main barriers to surgery were lack of awareness and cost. The RAAB methodology was easy to use, and each team could visit one cluster per day. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of blindness in > or =50-year-olds in Nakuru district was low, in part due to the high cataract surgical coverage. The RAAB is easy to use and inexpensive and provides information about the magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness that can be used for planning and monitoring eye care services.

Blindness↗