PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9848056

The primary interpretation workstation: information beyond image data.

K J Dreyer·A Mehta·K M Johnson·T Schultz·D Sack
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With the advent of picture archival and communication systems (PACS), the importance of design surrounding primary review workstations has become apparent. To help acceptance of filmless medical imaging, workstations must be developed that serve the needs of both radiologists and referring clinicians. This report will discuss integral requirements of workstation design, including information creation, medical management, medical knowledge, and enabling technologies.

Explore related subjects

Data DisplayRadiology Information SystemsUser-Computer InterfaceJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K J Dreyer, A Mehta, K M Johnson, T Schultz, D Sack. 1998. The primary interpretation workstation: information beyond image data.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03168172

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Determining the sharpness of electronic image displays: an evaluation of three methods.

The authors evaluated 3 methods developed to assess the level of monitor cathode ray tube (CRT) sharpness. Results include a comparison of 2 observer-based methods to a charged coupled device (CCD) digital camera-based method for the purposes of CRT equipment comparison, acceptance testing, and routine CRT quality control. Three methods designed to measure a monitor's sharpness were evaluated on a single 20-inch CRT monitor. We defined signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to be the overall signal difference measured by each method from the highest to lowest values divided by the average standard deviation of the measurements. Comparing the results of the 3 methods, the authors found that the digital CCD camera-based method provided a much higher SNR than the 2 observer-based methods and, therefore, is the preferred of the 3 methods for measuring the sharpness of CRT displays. The SNR values for the CCD, Cx and line target methods were 151.5, 4.9, and 4.3, respectively. The Cx target observer-based method (a novel target and scoring routine dubbed the "Cx" target because of its appearance) had a higher SNR than the line target observer-based method. The average time and standard deviation required to score the Cx and the line targets were 5.45 +/- 2.15 minutes and 8.34 +/- 2.95 minutes, respectively. The observer-based method results (and variability) versus the camera-based method results (and variability) indicate strong linear relationships. Exploring this finding and the optimization of the camera-based method are the subjects of future research.

Data Display↗