PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9848613

District sputum smear microscopy services in Malawi.

Abstract

SETTING: Government hospitals and health centres in 23 districts in Malawi. OBJECTIVE: To determine 1) the number and smear-positivity rate of sputum samples submitted at health centres and hospitals, and 2) the time for sputum samples to get from health centres to smear examination. DESIGN: Prospective data collection on sputum specimens coming from health centres to hospital laboratories, and over the equivalent time period, retrospective data collection from laboratory sputum registers. RESULTS: Information was collected over a period of 5.6 months during 1997. Of 21 527 patients submitting sputum samples, 16995 (79%) were from within the hospital and 4532 (21%) were from health centres. Of 15 833 new TB suspects, 12 804 (81%) submitted sputum within the hospital and 3029 (19%) were from health centres. The overall smear-positivity rate was 11.9%: the proportion of new suspects who were smear-positive was significantly higher in health centres (14.1%) compared with hospital-based patients (11.4%, P < 0.05); 27% of all sputum specimens from health centres took 8 days or longer to get to smear examination. Sputum smears were positive from 1-30 days between submission and laboratory examination. CONCLUSION: Fewer sputum samples are submitted at health centres compared with hospitals, and there may be long delays between sputum submission and smear examination. The precise reasons are unclear, but health centre staff need training about the importance of timely case finding procedures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A D Harries, T E Nyirenda, A Banerjee, C Mundy, F M Salaniponi. 1998. District sputum smear microscopy services in Malawi.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9848613/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The impact of micro health insurance on Rwandan health centre costs.

While the implications of payment mechanisms for provider behaviour and cost have been amply explored in industrialized countries, there is little empirical evidence from developing countries. This study exploits the opportunities created by a pilot study of micro health insurance with capitation in Rwanda to address this issue. Using cross-sectional data collected in 52 health centres, the paper employs an econometric cost function with payer-specific outputs to assess the cost impact of two provider payment mechanisms: (1) user fees for care paid by the uninsured, and (2) capitation payment paid by informal insurance schemes for the insured. The cost function allows payer-specific marginal and average costs and scale measures to be calculated. Findings point to significant differences in cost between the two payment forms. These may be due to the incentives embodied in the capitation provider payment or the less severe case-mix among insured patients arising from improved access to care for this group, or both. For both payment types there are important short-run economies of scale, which could be exploited through more intensive use of idle resources in health centres.

Community Health Centers↗