PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9852740

Polymers in dentistry.

S Deb
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There is a wide choice of materials available for restorative dentistry covering a range of requirements. Fundamental knowledge about the properties of the polymers in use in dentistry is an advantage as it provides information relevant to clinical practice. Dentistry, perhaps, has the unique distinction of using the widest variety of materials, ranging from polymers, metal and metal alloys, ceramics, inorganic salts and composite materials. In the present paper, polymers and polymer composites used directly or indirectly for restorations, prostheses or for production of appliances in dentistry is discussed.

Explore related subjects

Biomechanical PhenomenaComposite ResinsDental BondingDental Impression MaterialsDenture BasesHumansMaterials TestingPolymersJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Deb. 1998. Polymers in dentistry.. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954411981534213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking.

We studied the selection of preferred step width in human walking by measuring mechanical and metabolic costs as a function of experimentally manipulated step width (0.00-0.45L, as a fraction of leg length L). We estimated mechanical costs from individual limb external mechanical work and metabolic costs using open circuit respirometry. The mechanical and metabolic costs both increased substantially (54 and 45%, respectively) for widths greater than the preferred value (0.15-0.45L) and with step width squared (R(2) = 0.91 and 0.83, respectively). As predicted by a three-dimensional model of walking mechanics, the increases in these costs appear to be a result of the mechanical work required for redirecting the centre of mass velocity during the transition between single stance phases (step-to-step transition costs). The metabolic cost for steps narrower than preferred (0.10-0.00L) increased by 8%, which was probably as a result of the added cost of moving the swing leg laterally in order to avoid the stance leg (lateral limb swing cost). Trade-offs between the step-to-step transition and lateral limb swing costs resulted in a minimum metabolic cost at a step width of 0.12L, which is not significantly different from foot width (0.11L) or the preferred step width (0.13L). Humans appear to prefer a step width that minimizes metabolic cost.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2001

Coordination topology and stability for the native and binding conformers of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2.

We demonstrate that the stabilization of the binding region is accomplished at the expense of a loss in the stability of the rest of the protein. A novel molecular mechanics (MM) approach is introduced to distinguish residue stabilities of proteins in a given conformation. As an example, the relative stabilities of folded chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2) in unbound form, and CI2 in complex with subtilisin novo is investigated. The conformation of the molecule in the two states is almost identical, with an approximately 0.6-A root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of the Calpha atoms. On binding, the packing density changes only at the binding loop. However, residue fluctuations in the rest of the protein are greatly altered solely due to those contacts, indicating the effective propagation of perturbation and the presence of remotely controlling residues. To quantify the interplay between packing density, packing order, residue fluctuations, and residue stability, we adopt an MM approach whereby small displacements are inserted at selected residues, followed by energy minimization; the displacement of each residue in response to such perturbations are organized in a perturbation-response matrix L. We define residue stability lambda(i) = summation operator((j)L(ij))/ summation operator((j) L(ji)) as the ratio of the amount of change to which the residue is amenable, to the ability of a given residue to induce change. We then define the free energy associated with residue stability, DeltaG(lambda) = -RT ln lambda. DeltaG(lambda) intrinsically selects the residues that are in the folding core. Upon complexation, the binding loop becomes more resistant to perturbation, in contrast to the alpha-helix that favors change. Although the two forms of CI2 are structurally similar, residue fluctuations differ vastly, and the stability of many residues is altered upon binding. The decrease in entropy introduced by binding is thus compensated by these changes.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2001

Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical stability using four different posterior cervical fixation techniques was evaluated in human cadaveric spine. OBJECTIVES: To introduce an alternative interspinous fixation technique using wavy-shaped rods, and to compare its in vitro biomechanical stability with that of other posterior cervical fixation techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Fixation of the posterior cervical spine with interspinous wiring is well known as Rogers' or Bohlman's technique. Recently, several plate fixation techniques have been used for posterior cervical stabilization. Since 1983, the authors have developed the wavy-shaped rod system as an alternative to the interspinous fixation technique. This unique technique has been proven clinically useful in Japan. However, the authors are not aware of any prior biomechanical studies. METHODS: Seven fresh frozen cervical human spines were tested at the C5-C6 motion segment. Nondestructive static biomechanical testing was performed with flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation for the following stabilization techniques: intact spine, creation of a Stage 3 distractive-flexion injury followed by fixation with the wavy-shaped rods bounded by three multistrand cables, interspinous wiring with a multistrand cable, triple wiring technique using multistrand cables with a pair of unicortical grafts from the ilium, and lateral mass plate fixation with Magerl's screw technique. Testing was performed on a material testing machine (MTS 858 Bionix test system, MTS, Minneapolis, MN), and load displacement curves were obtained using four linear extensometers and one rotatory extensometer across the C5-C6 motion segment. RESULTS: In axial compression loading, the reconstructed specimens showed significant differences in range of motion measured at the anterior and posterior positions, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance. In a comparison of the four fixation techniques, the construct with the wavy-shaped rod indicated significantly less motion both anteriorly and posteriorly than with the other fixation techniques. Also in flexion-extension loading, all the techniques significantly limited the intervertebral motion below the level of the intact motion segment. Particularly, the construct with the wavy-shaped rod showed the smallest mobility, 49.9% anteriorly and 9.3% posteriorly, compared with that of the intact spine. In lateral bending, the lateral mass plate provided the greatest stability, which was superior to the intact segment, but the difference was not statistically significant. In axial rotation, all the reconstruction techniques limited the angular motion below the intact level (wavy rod, 68.0%; Rogers' wiring, 75.2%; Bohlman's triple wiring, 59.8%; lateral mass plate, 71.7%), but no significant differences were observed using one-way analysis of variance, as compared with the intact segment. CONCLUSIONS: All four reconstruction techniques restored the stability of the cervical motion segment to at least the level of the intact motion segment before destabilization. An alternative cervical posterior fixation technique, the Wavy Rod system, was considered the most effective technique in stabilizing a cervical motion segment, particularly in axial compression and flexion extension loading.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗