PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9855912

Euthanasia: a pragmatic view.

Abstract

There will never be a simple resolution of the euthanasia debate, and perhaps there should not be. However, any policy in a pluralistic society should be based on the wishes of the individual so long as those wishes do not adversely affect others. Perhaps, as in the Netherlands, euthanasia needs to be decriminalised without being made legal, in a similar way to the decriminalisation of soft drugs such as marijuana (interestingly, the Dutch laws on drugs have also been held up as a possible standard for the USA as drug use in the Netherlands is much less problematic than in the USA (36). Individuals should be able to make difficult decisions regarding their own lives and healthcare workers should have the freedom, without fear of prosecution, to allow people in their care to pursue those options with dignity. This article has supported the proponent view of euthanasia--that it can be beneficial as it affirms individual autonomy. Compassionate carers must consider all the arguments in order to determine their own personal stand on the issue.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Dowd, R Davidhizar. Euthanasia: a pragmatic view.. https://doi.org/10.7748/eldc.10.3.16.s13

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Existence and pluralism: the rediscovery of Karl Jaspers.

Karl Jaspers has been recognized in psychiatry mostly for his influence on phenomenology and on certain aspects of psychopathology, such as our understanding of delusions. In this paper, I will highlight the need to rediscover Jaspers' work in terms of other important ideas that he can contribute to psychiatry, in particular the concepts of limit situations, transcendence and pluralism. Limit situations refer to the fact that human life is characterized by existential situations, or crises, which become opportunities for authentic existence. Transcendence refers to the notion that freedom is an important aspect of human existence and cannot be explained by purely scientific understanding or encompassed by any purely rationalistic system of thought. Pluralism is perhaps Jaspers' most original perspective, which has still failed to be adequately appreciated by the psychiatric profession. The idea here is that science means understanding the methods by which we obtain knowledge, along with the presuppositions and limits of those methods. Contemporary psychiatry has only a limited appreciation of Jaspers' work. In this paper, I attempt to describe these important concepts that can help us understand what we do in psychiatry, what we should be doing and why.

Attitude to Death↗