PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9861251

Problem-solving tools for analyzing system problems. The affinity map and the relationship diagram.

C J Lepley
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The author describes how to use two management tools, an affinity map and a relationship diagram, to define and analyze aspects of a complex problem in a system. The affinity map identifies the key influencing elements of the problem, whereas the relationship diagram helps to identify the area that is the most important element of the issue. Managers can use the tools to draw a map of problem drivers, graphically display the drivers in a diagram, and use the diagram to develop a cause-and-effect relationship.

Explore related subjects

Audiovisual AidsData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansJob DescriptionManagement Quality CirclesNurse AdministratorsNursing, SupervisoryOrganizational InnovationProblem SolvingSystems AnalysisTotal Quality ManagementUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C J Lepley. 1998. Problem-solving tools for analyzing system problems. The affinity map and the relationship diagram.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-199812000-00014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Teaching basic life support skills using self-directed learning, a self-instructional video, access to practice manikins and learning in pairs.

Applying adult learning principles in healthcare education is increasingly recognised as useful and effective. We designed and evaluated an educational package for medical student basic life support (BLS) skills that placed the responsibility of skill acquisition with the learner. The package provided hardcopy and web based information, an in-house produced audio-video tape demonstrating BLS, and open access to manikins in a Skills Centre where the students learnt in pairs. Students determined when they were ready to be assessed. This assessment was performed by two independent observers using the Resuscitation Council (UK) BLS assessment sheet. Two groups, comprising in total 51 fourth year medical students were assessed, 47 were found to be competent in performing BLS on their first assessment. Of the remaining four, three were assessed as competent after further self-directed learning and retesting. Only one student required personal tutoring prior to success. Self-directed learning is a successful method of mastering BLS. Where failure occurred, it was due to inadequate student learning in the Skills Centre. The importance of practice needs emphasis in future use of the programme, as does the virtual guarantee of success, if all steps are followed. A similar programme could be devised for other technical skills.

Audiovisual Aids↗
PubMed2002

Asmund S. Laerdal.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Audiovisual Aids↗