PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9861717

Visually perceiving heading on circular and elliptical paths.

Abstract

Five experiments addressed the perception of curvilinear heading under various conditions of optical flow. Perception of heading was unaffected by optical noise (Experiment 1) and was successful and equally accurate for flows generated by circular and elliptical paths of locomotion (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, random perturbations of vector magnitudes in general curvilinear fields did not reduce the accuracy of perceived heading. When vector directions were randomly perturbed in Experiments 4 and 5, curvilinear heading perception was impaired. Discussion focuses on the inappropriateness of the vector normal hypothesis to the general curvilinear case, the importance of the pattern of relative vector directions, and the practical and theoretical significance of investigating different forms of noncanonical optical flow.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N G Kim, M T Turvey. 1998. Visually perceiving heading on circular and elliptical paths.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-1523.24.6.1690

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Reading with simulated scotomas: attending to the right is better than attending to the left.

Persons with central field loss must learn to read using eccentric retina. To do this, most adopt a preferred retinal locus (PRL), which substitutes for the fovea. Patients who have central field loss due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), most often adopt PRL adjacent to and to the left of their scotoma in visual field space. It has been hypothesized that this arrangement of PRL and scotoma would benefit reading. We tested this hypothesis by asking normally-sighted subjects to read with the left or right half of their visual field plus 3.2 degrees in the contralateral field masked from view. Letter identification, word identification, and reading were all slower when only the information in the left visual field was available. This was primarily due to the number of saccades required to successfully read to stimuli. These data imply that patients would be better off with PRL to the right of their scotoma than to the left for the purposes of reading.

Eye Movements