PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9889982

How did bacteria come to be?

Abstract

Bacteria in the modern taxonomic sense are one of the three Domains. They must have split from the other two after the bulk of the development of biochemistry and cell biology had taken place. Up to the time of the Last Universal Ancestor (LUA) the world had been monophyletic with little stable diversity. This is to say that as advances took place the older forms were eliminated and diversity was only temporary. Two kinds of events could, in principle, permit stable diversity to arise. One kind occurs when two nearly simultaneous, different advances occur, both of which overcome the same problem. While the previous type would be supplanted, if the new types did not compete with each other, new niches and habitats could lead to stable diversity. The second kind is a saltation or macroevolutionary event that greatly expands the biota and reduces previous constraints and thereby drastically reduces competition; this generally leads to a 'species radiation' and results in the development of a spectrum of biological types some of which persist and do not compete with each other. It is proposed that the two splits to yield the three Domains of Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya, resulted from one of each of these two processes leading to diversity. One arose from the consequences of cells accumulating substances from the environment, thus increasing their internal osmotic pressure. This resulted in two nearly simultaneous biological solutions: one (Bacteria) was the development of the external sacculus, i.e. the formation of a stress-bearing exoskeleton. The other (Eukarya) was the development of cytoskeletons and mechanoenzymes, i.e. formation of an endoskeleton. The other event causing diversity was the invention of an effective way to tap a new energy source and allow the biomass to increase extensively permitting a radiation of many different types of organisms. I suggest that this seminal advance was the development of methanogenesis. This caused a short-lived expansion and radiation before oxygen-producing photosynthesis allowed a still more major expansion and decreased the number of methanogens. Some details of these processes are elaborated. In particular, the evolutionary process that permitted the development of a sacculus, interpreted in light of the bacterial physiology of today's organisms is presented. It is argued that many great advances arise by developing a number of totally different processes for other purposes that can then each be modified to combine for yet another purpose.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A L Koch. 1998. How did bacteria come to be?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60135-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ori-Finder-Arch: An Updated Web Server for the Annotation and Visualization of Archaeal Replication Origins.

Archaea are promising chassis organisms in biotechnology, and the accurate annotation of their chromosomal replication origins (oriCs) is the key to unlocking their full potential. However, the existing Ori-Finder 2 web server suffers from low accuracy, slow speed, and limited scalability. In this study, we present Ori-Finder-Arch, an updated web server for high-performance oriC prediction in archaea. This pipeline integrates HMMER-based replication initiation protein (RIP) annotation, refined consensus motif recognition, and GC profile-based DNA unwinding element (DUE) detection. On a benchmark set of experimentally validated oriCs, Ori-Finder-Arch achieved a recall of 95.6% and a precision of 86.0%, substantially outperforming Ori-Finder 2 (62.2% and 63.6%, respectively), while running 4.75 times faster and supporting diverse assembly levels. When applied to the available archaeal assemblies, it successfully annotated 17,472 oriCs. Meanwhile, the web server provides interactive visualizations at different levels. In conclusion, Ori-Finder-Arch offers an efficient, accurate, and user-friendly platform for advanced studies of archaeal DNA replication initiation and synthetic biology applications, and is freely available at https://tubic.org/Ori-Finder-Arch/ and https://tubic.tju.edu.cn/Ori-Finder-Arch/.

Archaea↗

Genome-resolved assessment of archaeal diversity in full-scale anaerobic digesters reveals variability in mcrA primer coverage.

AIMS: Methanogenic archaea are key players in anaerobic digestion, driving methane production in biogas reactors. This study aimed to assess the diversity of methanogenic archaea in full-scale anaerobic digesters using genome-resolved metagenomics and to systematically evaluate the taxonomic coverage of commonly used mcrA-targeted qPCR primer sets against this genomic framework. METHODS AND RESULTS: Methanogenic diversity was assessed using 113 dereplicated archaeal metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) recovered from 109 full-scale anaerobic digesters treating diverse substrates. Genome-resolved analyses revealed a diverse archaeal community spanning multiple phyla, dominated by Halobacteriota and Methanobacteriota, with additional representatives from Methanobacteriota_B, Thermoplasmatota, and Thermoproteota. The presence of the mcrA gene was identified in a subset 55 MAGs, which were subsequently used as the genomic framework to evaluate six commonly used mcrA qPCR primer sets in silico. This subset clustered into nine phylogenetic groups and formed the basis for the primer coverage analysis. The evaluation revealed marked differences in taxonomic coverage among primer sets. Most primers preferentially detected Methanobacteriales and Methanosarcinales, while underrepresenting or excluding other methanogenic lineages, including H₂-dependent methylotrophic Methanomassiliicoccaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly used mcrA primer sets differ substantially in their ability to capture methanogenic diversity, with some showing broad representation of reactor-associated methanogens and others exhibiting strong lineage-specific biases. Genome-resolved metagenomics provides an effective framework for benchmarking primer performance and supports the selection and improvement of molecular tools for more accurate monitoring of anaerobic digestion systems.

Archaea↗

Unraveling the coastal marine plastisphere archaeome.

Plastic pollution has created an expanding anthropogenic microbial niche, the plastisphere, raising questions about microbial ecology and associated impacts. Archaea, the third domain of life with fundamental ecological and evolutionary significance, remain poorly understood in this habitat. Here, using paired plastic debris and bulk-water samples from coastal marine ecosystems, key archaeal habitats increasingly threatened by plastic pollution, we characterize the plastisphere archaeome through archaeal amplicon sequencing and metagenomics. We show that the archaeome is significantly reshaped in the plastisphere, exhibiting higher taxonomic diversity, greater community heterogeneity, and selective enrichment of Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota. Archaeal genes involved in methane, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling are enriched in the plastisphere. Taxonomic and functional divergence between the plastisphere and bulk water increases with anthropogenic chemical stress. These findings suggest that plastic pollution could alter marine archaeal diversity, biogeography, and biogeochemical potential, extending understanding of plastisphere impacts to the archaeal domain.

Archaea↗