PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9917552

[Methods for evaluating biological response modifiers].

Abstract

Biological response modifiers (BRM) are a new approach of cancer treatment. The guidelines for their evaluation are comparable to those used for evaluating conventional anticancer treatments. However, it is more difficult to assess their efficacy and toxicity because of their own properties and of the characteristics of underlying diseases. The objectives of studying BRM efficacy are the following : 1- to confirm the pharmacodynamic effect observed in experimental models; 2- to assess the benefit for the patient. Phase II studies can occasionally be performed in healthy volunteers. Efficacy criteria are objective response rate, progression free survival, overall survival or, for hematopoietic growth factors, more specific criteria. In randomized phase III studies patients in the control arm can be observed without treatment, or receive a placebo or a standard treatment. As regards toxicity, side effects specifically related to the use of BRM are the synthesis of cytokines, the stimulation of immune system, the stimulation of tumor growth, the synthesis of anti-mouse of anti-BRM antibodies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Harousseau. 1998. [Methods for evaluating biological response modifiers].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9917552/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

New antithrombotic agents.

The development of new antithrombotic agents has been stimulated by clinical needs and by advances in biotechnology that have made it possible to produce drugs that target specific steps in thrombogenesis. Heparin has pharmacokinetic and biophysical limitations that are overcome by new anticoagulants. Of these, low-molecular-weight heparin and direct inhibitors of thrombin have been evaluated clinically. Coumarins require careful laboratory monitoring because of concerns about safety. Orally active direct inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa may replace coumarins. Aspirin is of limited efficacy because it inhibits only one pathway of platelet activation. Inhibitors of adenosine diphosphate receptor and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists are more effective than aspirin and are used in the clinic.

Clinical Trials as Topic