PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9917706

Prospectus. Future trends in transfusion.

Abstract

There are several emerging trends in perioperative transfusion that are promising in terms of clinical practice. These include modifications in transfusion practice, changes in blood bank procedures and philosophy, the use of autologous transfusion methods, and the development of new artificial blood substitutes. Refinement of current techniques will continue, and will be driven by several factors. The most significant recent changes in surgical practice relating to blood transfusion include a decreased reliance on the use of arbitrary transfusion triggers, and the increased use of various forms of autologous transfusion. Other clinical changes have been less obvious, such as changes in blood bank management practice. Similar factors drive the development of blood conservation strategies and artificial blood substitutes or O2 carriers. Both will play a role in reducing perioperative blood loss. The most likely scenarios involve use of blood substitutes in conjunction with various methods of blood conservation. Recent advances in blood banking have made the donor blood supply safer than ever before. Progress in the clinical setting and in the laboratory have widened the possibilities for treatment of perioperative blood loss, with attention to minimizing risk and cost, and maintaining safety for the patient.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P A Manner, H E Rubash, J H Herndon. 1998. Prospectus. Future trends in transfusion.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9917706/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A randomized trial of blood donor recruitment strategies.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in donor return rates, especially among first-time donors, may significantly improve the blood supply. There are few rigorous studies of the effectiveness of various approaches to donor recruitment, however. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: By use of a single-blind, randomized trial design, 6919 post-September 11, 2001, first-time donors were randomly assigned into the following intervention arms: T-shirt incentive versus none, recruitment scripts with a patient story (Script A) versus a complimentary message including the donor's blood type (Script B), and telephone versus e-mail recruitment. Our primary outcome was a second donation within 6 months. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95 percent confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated with Taylor series methods. RESULTS: A total of 1421 (20.5%) first-time donors returned within the 6 months, including 1252 with a second and 169 with both second and third donations. The T-shirt incentive was not effective in increasing returns compared to no incentive (20.5% vs. 20.6%; RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09). Script A was significantly more effective than Script B (22.2% vs. 18.9%; RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.29). E-mail was substantially less effective than telephone recruitment (13.2% vs. 27.8%; RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: A T-shirt incentive had no apparent effect, but an empathetic message significantly improved the return donation rate. E-mail recruitment was substantially less effective than telephone recruitment, perhaps due to technical problems. The study illustrates the utility of the randomized clinical trial study design for testing donor recruitment strategies.

Blood Banking↗

Assessment of cord blood unit characteristics on the day of transplant: comparison with data issued by cord blood banks.

BACKGROUND: Selection of a cord blood (CB) unit for allogeneic transplantation relies on graft characterization results provided by cord blood banks (CBBs). The goal was to compare the graft characterization results obtained upon thawing and washing to those provided by CBBs at selection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With tests that assess CB graft characteristics known to impact engraftment, CB units have been analyzed after thaw and before infusion. Our results were compared to data provided by CBBs to determine the impact on engraftment and assess how CBB-supplied information can affect future CB unit selection. RESULTS: Variability was noted as to the type of information provided by the different CBBs. Also, variability was found between the information provided by CBBs and the graft characterization results obtained upon thawing and washing. In some cases, CB measures known to be predictive of engraftment were found much lower than reported by CBBs. Only the total nucleated cell count, which is the main CB graft selection criterion besides HLA matching, correlated favorably. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal a high degree of variability in graft characteristics provided by CBBs and often poor correlation with results obtained on thawed and washed CB units. We suggest that standardized laboratory procedures aimed at graft characterization should be used by both CBBs and transplant centers to avoid unacceptable discrepancies.

Blood Banking↗