PubMed · 9919191
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Watson. Lessons to be learned.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.13.7.16.s37
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Quality improvement in cardiac care has made considerable progress over the past 30 years. During that period, there has been the development of multi-institutional databases to monitor outcomes following cardiothoracic surgery. These databases initially began using only volume and unadjusted operative (30-day) mortality as outcome criteria. There has been a progressive increase in their sophistication, with the building of risk models based on preoperative variables, which accurately predict the risk of adverse outcomes. Other outcomes have been added including risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; efficiency outcomes such as length of stay, quality of life, functional health status, neuropsychological outcomes; and long-term outcomes.
We report two cases presenting bilateral coronary artery obstruction after arterial switch operation. The first patient underwent bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting to the left and right coronary arteries. The other patient, presenting a single coronary ostium, underwent surgical coronary ostial angioplasty in concomitance to proximal arterioplasty of both coronary arteries employing a single "pantaloon" shape autologous pericardial patch. Both patients survived and, at 1 year and 9 months after the coronary revascularization procedures, the coronary angiography demonstrated a good patency of the internal thoracic grafts and excellent ostial plasty results, respectively. A complete literature review of patients undergoing different coronary revascularization procedures after arterial switch operation is reported.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between preoperative risk prediction and intraoperative events. METHODS: A total of 3118 patients operated in 1999 and 2000 at our institution were analysed, all of whom had their EuroSCORE collected prospectively. The intraoperative variables studied were consultant or trainee operating, long bypass time, long ischaemic time, return on bypass in theatre and use of intra-aortic balloon pump at the end of the procedure. The outcomes are reported as hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay in the intensive therapy unit (pLOS-ITU, >48 h) and death or pLOS-ITU. Risk models were constructed by logistic regression for predicting these three outcomes. RESULTS: With the exception of prolonged cross-clamp time, all variables analysed were independently predictive of a negative outcome. Trainee operating had an apparent protective effect. All risk models performed well. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (95% CI) increased from 0.857 (0.81, 0.90) for EuroSCORE to 0.874 (0.83, 0.92) for the risk of death model. Similarly, the area under the ROC curve for the pLOS-ITU model increased from 0.687 (0.642, 0.732) to 0.734 (0.691, 0.777) and for the death or pLOS-ITU model from 0.717 (0.677, 0.756) to 0.757 (0.719, 0.795). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of adverse intraoperative events enhances preoperative risk prediction. This type of analysis could be used for identifying "near miss" outcomes in adult cardiac surgery.