PSA screening--current controversy.

D Svetec; I M Thompson

doi:10.1023/a:1008446208963

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9932156

PSA screening--current controversy.

D Svetec·I M Thompson

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There is perhaps no more contentious issue in Urology in 1998 than how and if PSA screening for prostate cancer should be applied. The issue must be discussed in the absence of completed randomized clinical trials, and arguments must be supported by extrapolated clinical data in the medical literature. Because of data which can be interpreted often in two different manners, groups and organizations including patient's groups, governmental agencies, medical organizations, and managed care providers often find themselves at odds with each other with regards to recommendations regarding PSA screening. In order to put these issues into perspective, a series of five questions will be answered.

Explore related subjects

Biomarkers, Tumor Brachytherapy Carcinoma Cost-Benefit Analysis Diagnostic Tests, Routine Disease Progression Humans Male Mass Screening Mortality Predictive Value of Tests Prostate-Specific Antigen Prostatectomy Prostatic Neoplasms Radioisotope Teletherapy Risk Factors United States Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D Svetec, I M Thompson. 1998. PSA screening--current controversy.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1008446208963

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2022

High tumor amplification burden is associated with TP53 mutations in the pan-cancer setting.

Next-generation sequencing data is fundamentally changing the clinical management of patients with cancer. The most frequent genomic alterations in malignancy are mutations and amplifications, with a subset of tumors having multiple amplifications - "amplificators". We sought to understand the molecular correlates of high tumor amplification burden in a pan-cancer context. Using both national registries and a single-institution dataset, our results demonstrate that cancers with TP53 mutations (as compared to those with wild-type TP53) exhibited significantly higher tumor amplification burden across all datasets. Amplifications, generally associated with overexpression, may be potentially actionable secondary consequences of TP53 mutations.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2021

Immune biomarkers and response to checkpoint inhibition of BRAFV600 and BRAF non-V600 altered lung cancers.

BACKGROUND: While 2-4% of lung cancers possess alterations in BRAF, little is known about the immune responsiveness of these tumours. METHODS: Clinical and genomic data were collected from 5945 patients with lung cancers whose tumours underwent next-generation sequencing between 2015 and 2018. Patients were followed through 2020. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients with metastatic BRAF-altered lung cancers were identified: 29 tumours had Class I mutations, 59 had Class II/III alterations, and 39 had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Tumour mutation burden was higher in Class II/III than Class I-altered tumours (8.8 mutations/Mb versus 4.9, P < 0.001), but this difference was diminished when stratified by smoking status. The overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was 9% in Class I-altered tumours and 26% in Class II/III (P = 0.25), with median time on treatment of 1.9 months in both groups. Among patients with Class I-III-altered tumours, 36-month HR for death in those who ever versus never received ICI was 1.82 (1.17-6.11). Nine patients were on ICI for >2 years (two with Class I mutations, two with Class II/III alterations, and five with VUS). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with BRAF-altered lung cancers achieved durable disease control on ICI. However, collectively no significant clinical benefit was seen.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2002

Serum retinol and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with child-Pugh class A cirrhosis.

Liver cirrhosis is the main risk factor for the development of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this condition, the liver and plasma suffer a drastic depletion of retinoids. This study was conducted to investigate whether any relation exists between serum retinol levels and HCC development in cirrhotics. Seventy child-Pugh class A cirrhotic patients, 16 child-Pugh class A cirrhotic patients with HCC, and 140 age- and sex-matched subjects were included in this study. At the time of enrollment, fasting blood samples were taken to determine serum retinol levels. For the following 7 years, the 70 cirrhotic patients were also followed up for the occurrence of HCC by periodic screening with ultrasonography and serum alpha-fetoprotein assays. The serum retinol levels in both cirrhotic patients and HCC patients were significantly lower than those in healthy subjects. Among the 70 cirrhotic patients, 14 HCC were detected during follow-up. The prediagnostic retinol levels were significantly lower in cirrhotic patients who developed HCC compared with patients who did not. The odds ratio of cirrhotic patients who developed HCC in the lowest tertile to highest tertile of retinol status was 6.75 (95% CI=1.26--36.0; P=0.015). Our results suggest that a state of retinoid deficiency may promote hepatocarcinogenesis in patients at high risk such as cirrhotics.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗