PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9932686

Using queueing theory to determine operating room staffing needs.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To meet American College of Surgeons criteria, Level I and II trauma centers are required to have in-house operating room (OR) staff 24 hours per day. According to the number of emergency cases occurring, hospitals may have varying needs for OR staffing during the night shift. Queueing theory, the analysis of historic data to provide optimal service while minimizing waiting, is an objective method of determining staffing needs during any time period. This study was done to determine the need to activate a backup OR team during the night shift at a designated, verified Level II trauma center. METHODS: The basic queueing theory formula for a single-phase, single-channel system was applied to patients needing the services of the OR. The mean arrival rate was determined by dividing the number of actual cases by 2,920 hours in a year (8 hours per night x 365). The mean service rate is determined by averaging the length of the actual cases during the period studied. Using the mean arrival rate and the mean service rate, the probability of two or more patients needing the OR at the same time was determined. This probability was used to reflect the likelihood of needing to activate the backup OR team. Simulation was then used to calculate the same probability and validate the results obtained from the queueing model. RESULTS: All OR cases (n = 62) beginning after 11 PM and before 7 AM from July 1, 1996, through June 30, 1997, were analyzed. During the study period, the average arrival rate (A) was one patient every 5.9 days (0.0212 patient every hour), with an average service rate (mu) of 80.79 minutes per patient (0.7427 patients per hour). According to queueing theory, lambda = 0.0212 patients per hour, mu = 0.7427 patients per hour, lambda/mu = 0.0285, the probability of no patients being in the system (P0) = 0.9714, P1 = 0.0278, P> or =2 = 1 - (0.0278 + 0.9714) = 0.0008. The probability of two or more cases occurring simultaneously on the night shift is less than 0.1%. CONCLUSION: In our institution, activation of a second OR team is unnecessary when the first team is busy with a case on the night shift because the likelihood of two cases occurring concurrently is less than one in a thousand. Queueing theory can be a valuable tool to use in determining the staffing needs of many hospital departments. Trauma centers should apply this mathematical model in optimizing the use of their operational resource.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J B Tucker, J E Barone, J Cecere, R G Blabey, C K Rha. 1999. Using queueing theory to determine operating room staffing needs.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199901000-00012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Changing social policy: Grassroots to legislation.

Health care in the United States has evolved into a multimillion dollar business. As the health care industry has grown, so too has government regulation and involvement. As both insurers and patients vie to get the most for their health care dollars, federal and state governments attempt to mediate, prevent fraud and abuse, and protect all parties involved. Consumers feel the effects of this "tug of war" in the form of higher copayments, premiums, and out-of-pocket costs, as well as denial of coverage. This denial of coverage sparked a very successful grassroots effort to stop commercial insurers in the state of Connecticut from defining ostomy supplies as cosmetic and thus denying reimbursement. A tremendous amount of collaboration between Connecticut WOC nurses, state legislators, local American Cancer Society advocates, United Ostomy Association chapter members, and health care providers resulted in a powerful mobilization and support for House Bill No. 5120. This bill went beyond defining ostomy supplies as medically necessary but also set a minimum rate for reimbursement. Social policy changed, improving the lives of Connecticut citizens with an ostomy. Although many people fear they do not have the power to make necessary changes in government, this experience proved otherwise. The collaboration that occurred was patient advocacy at its best. This article describes the process that allowed this successful collaboration to take place with the hope that others will be inspired to get involved with patient advocacy through political involvement. It is the intention of this work to capture the essence of dedication of a grassroots campaign involving a small group of well-organized, highly focused participants who were responsible for changing public health care policy in the state of Connecticut.

Connecticut↗