PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 993743

Flexible coding in word recognition.

H L Hawkins·G M Reicher·M Rogers·L Peterson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

An experiment was designed to examine the contribution of phonetic information in the processing of words in tachistoscopic recognition masking. Following stimulus presentation, subjects were required to indicate which of two alternatives had appeared. On trials containing word stimuli, the alternatives were either phonetically identical (SENT, CENT) or not (SOLD, COLD). Recognition performance was inferior in the former case, provided conditions were not structured to discourage reliance on phonetic information. The findings were interpreted as showing that more than one type of coding process can underly the word superiority effect. Phonetic information is ordinarily used to code words in this type of task, but an alternative processing tactic (e.g., one relying on visual or perhaps semantic codes) can also be effectively used in word recognition when phonetic information does not discriminate well among response alternatives.

Explore related subjects

Discrimination, PsychologicalFemaleForm PerceptionHumansInformation TheoryMalePerceptual MaskingPhoneticsSemanticsVisual PerceptionJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H L Hawkins, G M Reicher, M Rogers, L Peterson. 1976. Flexible coding in word recognition.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-1523.2.3.380

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant.

A forced choice paradigm was used to measure the capacity of human subjects to discriminate the curvature of stimuli applied passively to the skin of an immobilized finger. The stimuli consisted of spherically curved segments with a base radius of 2.5 mm; thus the area of contact with the fingerpad skin was approximately 19.6 mm2 for all stimuli. There were 2 series of experiments. In series 1, the standard surface had a curvature of 286 m-1 (radius of curvature 3.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 13%. In series 2, the standard had a curvature of 154 m-1 (radius 6.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 18%. Thus, even when the contact area between the surface and the skin was invariant, humans were able to discriminate small changes in curvature using only information from the cutaneous receptors.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1992

Segregation of mesh-derived textures evaluated by resistance to added disorder.

In the "figure detection task" the strength of segregation for a particular texture pair was estimated by the threshold amount of added disorder that prevented segregation of a textured figure from a textured ground. Disorder was either jitter in the orientation of the texture elements, or jitter in their xy positions, or a mixture of the two. Other procedures included lowpass filtering, and a task requiring discrimination between textured figures of different shapes. Orientation cues are weakly or inconsistently used for segregating mesh textures. The low spatial harmonics are very important. A new finding is that orientation and position jitter thresholds for a set of figure/ground texture patterns are often proportional. In a mixture the one disorder can be exchanged for the other.

Discrimination, Psychological↗