PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9972913

Lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report mid-term results after 25 consecutive lung volume reduction operations (LVRS) for the treatment of severe dyspnea due to advanced emphysema. METHODS STUDY DESIGN: patients were studied prospectively up to 12 months after surgery. SETTING: preoperative evaluation, surgery and postoperative care took place in our university hospital. PATIENTS: patient selection was based on severe dyspnea and airway obstruction despite optimal medical treatment, lung overinflation and completed rehabilitation programme. PATIENTS with severe hypercarbia (PCO2>50 mmHg) were excluded. Nineteen rehabilitated patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria but postponed or denied LVRS were followed up clinically. INTERVENTIONS: LVRS was performed bilaterally in 22 patients (median sternotomy) and unilaterally in 3 patients (limited thoracotomy). MEASURES: Outcome was measured by dyspnea evaluation, 6-minute-walking distance and pulmonary function tests. RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively dyspnea and mobility improved significantly (MRC score from 3.3+/-0.7 to 2.12+/-0.8, 6-min-walk from 251+/-190 to 477+/-189 m). These results were superior compared to the results of the conservatively treated patients. Significant improvement could also be documented in airway obstruction (FEV1 from 960+/-369 to 1438+/-610 ml) and overinflation (TLC from 133+/-14 to 118+/-21% predicted and RV from 280+/-56 to 186+/-59% predicted). CONCLUSIONS: LVRS is an effective and promising treatment option for selected patients with end-stage emphysema and could be offered as an alternative and / or bridge to lung transplantation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Demertzis, H Wilkens, M Lindenmeir, T Graeter, H J Schäfers. 1998. Lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9972913/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Dyspnea in cancer patients].

'Dyspnea' is a subjective symptom defined as "an uncomfortable sensation of breathing". It should be distinguished from 'respiratory failure' defined as hypoxia. It is important to know that dyspnea is also related to psychological distress such as anxiety. The important points of management of dyspnea are described here; (1)Treat the underlying causes (e.g. antibiotics for pneumonia, blood transfusion for anemia), (2) pharmacological interventions such as morphine and anxiolytics, (3) non-pharmacological interventions such as oxygen, respiratory rehabilitation and relaxation. Since dyspnea in cancer patients has multidimensional aspects, interdisciplinary team approach for the symptom management is important.

Dyspnea↗

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: The widespread application of pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should be preceded by demonstrable improvements in function attributable to the programs. This review updates that reported in 2001. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of rehabilitation on health-related quality of life (QoL) and exercise capacity in patients with COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified additional RCTs from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register. Searches were current as of July 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected RCTs of rehabilitation in patients with COPD in which quality of life (QoL) and/or functional (FEC) or maximal (MEC) exercise capacity were measured. Rehabilitation was defined as exercise training for at least four weeks with or without education and/or psychological support. Control groups received conventional community care without rehabilitation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) using a random-effects model. We requested missing data from the authors of the primary study. MAIN RESULTS: We included the 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the 2001 Cochrane review. Eight additional RCTs (for a total of 31) met the inclusion criteria. We found statistically significant improvements for all the outcomes. In four important domains of QoL (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire scores for Dyspnea, Fatigue, Emotional function and Mastery), the effect was larger than the minimal clinically important difference of 0.5 units (for example: Dyspnoea score: WMD 1.0 units; 95% confidence interval: 0.8 to 1.3 units; n = 12 trials). Statistically significant improvements were noted in two of the three domains of the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire. For FEC and MEC, the effect was small and slightly below the threshold of clinical significance for the six-minute walking distance (WMD: 48 meters; 95% CI: 32 to 65; n = 16 trials). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation relieves dyspnea and fatigue, improves emotional function and enhances patients' sense of control over their condition. These improvements are moderately large and clinically significant. Rehabilitation forms an important component of the management of COPD.

Dyspnea↗