PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9987887

Cyclohexyl nitrite encounter.

Abstract

A brown glass bottle containing yellow liquid was submitted for examination for the presence of common controlled substances. While no controlled substances were detected, the liquid was identified as impure cyclohexyl nitrite, a compound of the same chemical class as amyl and butyl nitrite, which are known for their abuse potential. A bottle labeled cyclohexyl nitrite, but not confirmed by analysis, is the only known previous case submitted to this lab. The case history, examination, and analytical results are presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I K Dearmore. 1999. Cyclohexyl nitrite encounter.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9987887/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Isolation and quantification of dissolved lignin from natural waters using solid-phase extraction and GC/MS.

Solid-phase extraction (SPE) was tested for the isolation of dissolved lignin from diverse natural waters (fresh, estuarine, and marine) in preparation for CuO oxidation. Capillary GC coupled to selected-ion monitoring mass spectrometry (SIM-MS) of CuO oxidation products provides the high sensitivity and precision required for the identification and quantification of trace levels of lignin in seawater. The low blanks and quick cleanup of C18 cartridges support SPE for processing such samples. Comparison of SPE with other isolation procedures (direct dry-down and ultrafiltration) has shown that this method quantitatively recovers dissolved lignin and preserves its compositional parameters. The concentration and nature of dissolved organic matter appear to be primary factors that constrain the amount of water that should be processed to obtain quantitative and reproducible recoveries of dissolved lignin using SPE. Highest recoveries of dissolved lignin were obtained at low pH (1.5-4.0) with substantial decreases at pH > 4. Extraction efficiencies were independent of flow rate within a range of five to fifteen bed volumes per minute (50-150 mL min(-1)), and both refrigeration and freezing were appropriate long-term storage methods for processed cartridges prior to elution of retained dissolved lignin.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗

Multiresidue analysis of seventeen pesticides in wine by gas chromatography with mass-selective detection.

We have developed a multiresidue method permitting the simultaneous quantitation of 17 pesticides in wine: dicloran, dimethoate, diazinon, chlorpyrifos-methyl, vinclozolin, carbaryl, methiocarb, dichlofluanid, parathion-ethyl, triadimefon, procymidone, myclobutanil, iprodione, imidan, dicofol, phosalone and azinphos-methyl. Solid-phase extraction of 0.5 ml of wine sample is followed by direct injection of 1 microl of the eluent onto a DB-5 MS gas chromatographic column followed by mass-selective detection using one target and two qualifier ions for each pesticide. The extraction and injection steps are carried out with automatic instrumentation. Good resolution of all compounds was achieved with a run-time approximating 23 min. Detection and quantitation limits were around 2 microg/l and 10 microg/l, respectively, with linear calibration curves up to 3 mg/l for most constituents. Recovery in half the compounds was >90%, and >80% in most of the remainder. Imprecision (relative standard deviation) was <10% for most pesticides and <18% in all. Further analytes can be added to the repertoire without difficulty. The method merits consideration together with four other multiresidue methods now available that offer similar analytical characteristics, slower run-times, and a different selection of analytes.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗

Interlaboratory study of identification and quantitation of multiresidue pyrethroids in agricultural products by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

This paper deals with the different GC-MS analytical conditions adopted by four laboratories in an attempt to confirm the accuracy of the GC-electron-capture detection (ECD) analytical results during the international collaborative study for the establishment of the AOAC Official Method 998. 01. What is especially noted is that two laboratories have conducted comparative analysis of the respective 12 blind samples with both methods of GC-ECD and GC-MS, and the analytical results of the two methods turn out to be basically identical. This fully demonstrates that GC-MS is not only an effective confirmation tool in the analysis of the pyrethroid residues but also of sufficient sensitivity regarding the maximum residue limit of determination prescribed by FAO/WHO. Moreover, its selectivity is better than GC-ECD.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗