Wall-scattering effects in electron beam collimation.

R van der Laarse; I A Bruinvis; M F Nooman

doi:10.3109/02841867809127912

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 99983

Wall-scattering effects in electron beam collimation.

R van der Laarse·I A Bruinvis·M F Nooman

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This report describes now a set of applicators, convering fields with dimensions of 4 to 20 cm, for the 6 to 20 MeV electron beams of a MEL SL75-20 linear accelerator was developed. The electron scatter contribution of the applicator walls to the treatment field was investigated, varying the applicator entrance opening and the scattering foil, with the aim of optimizing the resulting field flatness, with a minimum loss of depth dose. Experiments with field defining end frames and additional perspex scatterers for large field sizes are also reported.

Explore related subjects

Electrons Particle Accelerators Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy, High-Energy Scattering, Radiation Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R van der Laarse, I A Bruinvis, M F Nooman. 1978. Wall-scattering effects in electron beam collimation.. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841867809127912

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Technical note: reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: In breast radiotherapy, delivery of manually-calculated electron boosts limits retrospective dose-response analyses as dose distribution is unavailable. This work evaluates the feasibility of reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast-conserving radiotherapy. METHODS: Only 72 out of 198 breast cancer patients had complete stored dose distributions from sequential electron boosts in the REQUITE study. Arbitrary data from 70/72 patients were used to develop and validate dose reconstruction method. Twenty patients were used to determine optimal parameters for Monte-Carlo-based (MC) electron dose reconstruction on RayStation (v.11B-R), considering CT-calibration curve, MC-history number, andcalculation grid resolution. Remaining 50 patients were used to quantify dose reconstruction accuracy. The similarity between reconstructed and stored dose was evaluated using 3D-gamma index and dosimetric parameters extracted from breast and tumour bed contours. Dose difference location was evaluated using dose-location histogram. RESULTS: Calculation grid resolution significantly impacted electron dose distribution (p < 0.01), where the finest grid (0.15 cm) showed highest similarity to stored doses. CT-calibration curve and MC-history number had a negligible influence on dose reconstruction. Dosimetric difference between reconstructed and stored doses was < 1 Gy for breast and tumour bed. Reconstructed dose was achieved > 90% gamma passing rate in the validation set. However, around 2.5 Gy dose differences were observed at the skin and tissue interface regions. CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective electron boost dose reconstruction is feasible with acceptable accuracy, and could increase data completeness in large cohort studies. Caution is advised when assessing dose near tissue interface and further validation is needed outside the REQUITE dataset.

Electrons↗

PubMed2001

Experimental determination of depth-scaling factors and central axis depth dose for clinical electron beams.

Depth-scaling factors rho(eff) for clear polystyrene and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantoms have been determined experimentally as a function of nominal electron-beam energy in the range 6 to 22 MeV. Values of rho(eff) have been calculated from the ratio rho(eff) = R(wat)(50) / R(med)(50), where R(wat)(50) and R(med)(50) are the measured depths of 50% ionization in electron solid water and plastic (clear polystyrene and PMMA) phantoms, respectively. Measurements were made using an Attix chamber in an electron solid water phantom, a Holt chamber in a clear polystyrene phantom, and a Markus chamber in a PMMA phantom. The average value of measured rho(poly)(eff) was found to be 0.999 +/- 0.009. This is higher than the value of 0.975 recommended by Task Group 25 (TG-25) of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) by 2.5%. Depending on energy, the maximum differences between the AAPM TG-25-recommended and the measured values lie in the range 1% to 3.5%. Similarly, the average value of measured rho(PMMA)(eff) was found to be 1.168 +/- 0.023. This is higher than the AAPM TG-25-recommended value of 1.115, by 5%. Depending on energy, the maximum differences between the AAPM TG-25-recommended and the measured values lie in the range 3% to 8%. Central axis depth dose curves in water were generated for 6, 15, and 20 MeV electron beams from measured depth-ionization data in PMMA and clear polystyrene phantoms following the recommendations of the AAPM TG-25 report and using both TG-25-recommended and experimentally determined values of depth-scaling factors rho(eff). For both phantoms, either the TG-25-recommended value or the experimentally determined values of rho(eff) yielded agreement to within about 2 mm among all depth doses in water at the depths of clinical relevance.

Electrons↗

PubMed2001

Coupled electron/proton transfer in complex flavoproteins: solvent kinetic isotope effect studies of electron transfer in xanthine oxidase and trimethylamine dehydrogenase.

A solvent kinetic isotope effect study of electron transfer in two complex flavoproteins, xanthine oxidase and trimethylamine dehydrogenase, has been undertaken. With xanthine oxidase, electron transfer from the molybdenum center to the proximal iron-sulfur center of the enzyme occurs with a modest solvent kinetic isotope effect of 2.2, indicating that electron transfer out of the molybdenum center is at least partially coupled to deprotonation of the Mo(V) donor. A Marcus-type analysis yields a decay factor, beta, of 1.4 A(-1), indicating that, although the pyranopterin cofactor of the molybdenum center forms a nearly contiguous covalent bridge from the molybdenum atom to the proximal iron-sulfur center of the enzyme, it affords no exceptionally effective mode of electron transfer between the two centers. For trimethylamine dehydrogenase, rates of electron equilibration between the flavin and iron-sulfur center of the one-electron reduced enzyme have been determined, complementing previous studies of electron transfer in the two-electron reduced form. The results indicate a substantial solvent kinetic isotope effect of 10 +/- 4, consistent with a model for electron transfer that involves discrete protonation/deprotonation and electron transfer steps. This contrasts to the behavior seen with xanthine oxidase, and the basis for this difference is discussed in the context of the structures for the two proteins and the ionization properties of their flavin sites. With xanthine oxidase, a rationale is presented as to why it is desirable in certain cases that the physical layout of redox-active sites not be uniformly increasing in reduction potential in the direction of physiological electron transfer.

Electrons↗