SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Possible mechanisms of cannabinoid-induced antinociception in the spinal cord.

Anandamide is an endogenous ligand at both the inhibitory cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and the excitatory vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1). The CB(1) receptor and vanilloid VR1 receptor are expressed in about 50% and 40% of dorsal root ganglion neurons, respectively. While all vanilloid VR1 receptor-expressing cells belong to the calcitonin gene-related peptide-containing and isolectin B4-binding sub-populations of nociceptive primary sensory neurons, about 80% of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-expressing cells belong to those sub-populations. Furthermore, all vanilloid VR1 receptor-expressing cells co-express the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor. In agreement with these findings, neonatal capsaicin treatment that induces degeneration of capsaicin-sensitive, vanilloid VR1 receptor-expressing, thin, unmyelinated, nociceptive primary afferent fibres significantly reduced the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor immunostaining in the superficial spinal dorsal horn. Synthetic cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists, which do not have affinity at the vanilloid VR1 receptor, and low concentrations of anandamide both reduce the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents and electrical stimulation-evoked or capsaicin-induced excitatory postsynaptic currents in substantia gelatinosa cells in the spinal cord without any effect on their amplitude. These effects are blocked by selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonists. Furthermore, the paired-pulse ratio is increased while the postsynaptic response of substantia gelatinosa neurons induced by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxasole-propionic acid (AMPA) in the presence of tetrodotoxin is unchanged following cannabinoid CB(1) receptor activation. These results strongly suggest that the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor is expressed presynaptically and that the activation of these receptors by synthetic cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists or low concentration of anandamide results in inhibition of transmitter release from nociceptive primary sensory neurons. High concentrations of anandamide, on the other hand, increase the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents recorded from substantia gelatinosa neurons. This increase is blocked by ruthenium red, suggesting that this effect is mediated through the vanilloid VR1 receptor. Thus, anandamide at high concentrations can activate the VR1 and produce an opposite, excitatory effect to its inhibitory action produced at low concentrations through cannabinoid CB(1) receptor activation. This "dual", concentration-dependent effect of anandamide could be an important presynaptic modulatory mechanism in the spinal nociceptive system.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1999

Motor actions of cannabinoids in the basal ganglia output nuclei.

The levels of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the basal ganglia are the highest in the brain, comparable to the levels of dopamine receptors, a major transmitter in the basal ganglia. This localization of receptors is consistent with the profound effects on motor function exerted by cannabinoids. The output nuclei of the basal ganglia, the globus pallidus (GP) and substantia nigra reticulata (SNr), apparently lack intrinsic cannabinoid receptors. Rather, the receptors are located on afferent terminals, the striatum being the major source. Cannabinoids blocked the inhibitory action of the striatal input in the SNr. Furthermore, cannabinoids blocked the excitatory effect of stimulation of the subthalamic input to the SNr revealing, along with data from in situ hybridization studies, that this input is another likely source of cannabinoid receptors to the SNr. Similar actions of cannabinoids were observed in the GP. Behavioral studies further revealed that the action of cannabinoids differs depending upon which input to the output nuclei of the basal ganglia is active. The inhibitory striatal input is quiescent and the cannabinoid action is observable only upon stimulation of the striatum, while the noticeable effect of cannabinoids under basal conditions would be on the tonically active subthalamic input. These data suggest that the recently discovered endogenous cannabinergic system exerts a major modulatory action in the basal ganglia by its ability to block both the major excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the SNr and GP.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Changes in cannabinoid receptor binding and mRNA levels in several brain regions of aged rats.

We have recently found that cannabinoid receptor binding and gene expression markedly decreased in extrapyramidal structures of aged rats. The present study was designed to analyze the possible existence of similar aging-induced changes in cannabinoid receptor binding and gene expression in brain regions other than extrapyramidal areas, but that also contain a significant population of cannabinoid receptors, such as the cerebellum, hippocampal structures, limbic and hypothalamic nuclei, the cerebral cortex and others. To this end, we analyzed cannabinoid receptor binding, using autoradiography, and cannabinoid receptor mRNA levels, using in situ hybridization, in slide-mounted brain sections obtained from young (3 month old) and aged (> 2 year old) rats. Results were as follows. In the cerebellum, aged rats exhibited a marked decrease in cannabinoid receptor binding in the molecular layer (-33.3%), although accompanied by no changes in mRNA levels in the granular layer. In the cerebral cortex, a small, although statistically significant, decrease in binding was found in the deep layer (VI) (-18.3%) of aged rats, whereas no changes were found in the superficial layer (I). As in the case of the cerebellum, mRNA levels did not change in the cerebral cortex layers (II-III and V-VI). The different regions of the Ammon's horn of the hippocampus exhibited similar cannabinoid receptor binding levels in aged and young rats. Interestingly, mRNA levels decreased in aged rats to a small, but statistically significant, extent (CA1: -26.1%; CA2: -21.6%; CA3: -14.4%). This was also seen in another hippocampal structure, the dentate gyrus (-14.6%), although in this region binding levels increased in aged rats (+28.4%). Two hypothalamic structures, the arcuate nucleus and the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, exhibited decreased cannabinoid receptor binding in aged rats (-31.1% and -30.3%, respectively), but this was not seen in the medial preoptic area. This was accompanied by no changes in mRNA levels in the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus. In the limbic structures, aged rats exhibited similar binding levels to young rats. This was seen in the nucleus accumbens, septum nuclei and basolateral amygdaloid nucleus. However, mRNA levels slightly decreased in the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus (-13.4%), whereas they were not altered in the septum nuclei. Finally, other brain structures, such as the central gray substance and the brainstem, exhibited similar binding levels in aged and young rats. However, it is important to note that mRNA levels increased significantly (+211.2%) in the brainstem of aged rats, an area where the levels of binding and mRNA were very low in young rats. This marked increase may be related to an increase in the presence of glial elements in this region, as revealed by the increase in the immunoreactivity for glial fibrillary acidic protein observed in the brainstem of aged rats as compared to young animals. In summary, senescence was associated with changes in cannabinoid receptors in the cerebellum, the cerebral cortex, limbic and hypothalamic structures, the hippocampus and other brain regions. However, the changes observed (i) were not as marked and relevant as those early reported in extrapyramidal areas, and (ii) exhibited regional differences that might be attributed to the different roles played by these receptors in each region. Of particular relevance by their magnitude were the aging-induced decrease in binding found in the cerebellum and the hypothalamus, and the increase in mRNA levels observed in the brainstem. The latter might be related to an increase in the presence of glial cells which might contain cannabinoid receptor mRNA.

Aging↗

PubMed1993

Characterization of a region of steric interference at the cannabinoid receptor using the active analog approach.

In this paper, it is hypothesized that the distinction between certain active and inactive cannabinoids is that the inactive analogs possess extra volume associated with their carbocyclic rings that may be responsible for an unfavorable interaction at the cannabinoid receptor. Using the active analog approach, a model is developed of a region of steric interference at this receptor using the active cannabinoids (-)-trans-delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, (-)-trans-delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol, (-)-11-hydroxy-beta-hexahydrocannabinol, and a (-)-trans-11-hydroxy-delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol dimethylheptyl derivative and the inactive cannabinoids (9S,6aR)-trans-delta 10,10a-tetrahydrocannabinol and a (+)-trans-11-hydroxy-delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol dimethylheptyl derivative. Each of these molecules satisfy the cannabinoid pharmacophoric requirements, i.e., a phenolic oxygen at C1 and a side chain of acceptable length at C3. Accessible conformers of each molecule were identified by using the method of molecular mechanics as encoded in the MMP2(85) program. The MAP facility within the Chem-X molecular modeling program was then used to calculate the region of steric interference (termed the receptor essential volume, REV) from these accessible conformers. The calculations revealed an REV region located near the top of the carbocyclic ring in the bottom face of the molecule. In order to explore the use of this REV to account for the activities of other cannabinoids, the minimally active classical cannabinoid (-)-11-hydroxy-alpha-hexahydrocannabinol, an active benzofuran cannabinoid, and the active nonclassical cannabinoid CP-47,497 were then studied. In each case, the activity or minimal activity of each compound can be explained on the basis of the ability of one or more accessible conformer of each molecule to clear the REV calculated here. The results of this study provide an explanation at the molecular level for observed activity differences between cannabinoids that exhibit shape differences associated with their carbocyclic rings.

Benzofurans↗

PubMed2004

CB1 receptor agonist and heroin, but not cocaine, reinstate cannabinoid-seeking behaviour in the rat.

We recently provided evidence for a functional link between cannabinoid and opioid endogenous systems in relapse to heroin-seeking behaviour in rats. In the present study, we aimed at investigating whether the previously observed cross-talk between cannabinoids and opioids could be extended to mechanisms underlying relapse to cannabinoid-seeking behaviour after a prolonged period of abstinence. In rats previously trained to intravenously self-administer the synthetic cannabinoid receptor (CB1) agonist WIN 55,212-2 (12.5 microg kg(-1) inf(-1)) under a fixed ratio (FR1) schedule of reinforcement, noncontingent nonreinforced intraperitoneal (i.p.) priming injections of the previously self-administered CB1 agonist (0.25 and 0.5 mg kg(-1)) as well as heroin (0.5 mg kg(-1)), but not cocaine (10 mg kg(-1)), effectively reinstate cannabinoid-seeking behaviour following 3 weeks of extinction. The selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A (0.3 mg kg(-1) i.p.) does not reinstate responding when given alone, but completely prevents the cannabinoid-seeking behaviour triggered by WIN 55,212-2 or heroin primings. The nonselective opioid antagonist naloxone (1 mg kg(-1) i.p.) has no effect on operant behaviour per se, but significantly blocks cannabinoid- and heroin-induced reinstatement of cannabinoid-seeking behaviour. These results provide the first evidence of drug-induced reinstatement of cannabinoid-seeking behaviour, and further strengthen previous findings on a cross-talk between the endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems in relapse mechanisms to drug-seeking.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Pharmacologic interaction between cannabinoid and either clonidine or neostigmine in the rat formalin test.

BACKGROUND: Although spinal cannabinoid receptor agonist (WIN 55,212-2) has been shown to encounter various models of pain, the role of two subtypes of cannabinoid receptor for the antinociceptive effect of cannabinoids has not been investigated at the spinal level. Spinal alpha 2 receptor agonist (clonidine) and cholinesterase inhibitor (neostigmine) are also active in the modulation of nociception. The authors examined the properties of drug interaction after coadministration of WIN 55,212-2-clonidine, and intrathecal WIN 55,212-2-neostigmine, and further clarified the role of cannabinoid 1 and 2 receptors in cannabinoid-induced antinociception at the spinal level. METHODS: Catheters were inserted into the intrathecal space of male Sprague-Dawley rats, and 50 microl of 5% formalin solution was injected into the hind paw to evoke the pain. Isobolographic analysis was used for evaluation of pharmacologic interaction. RESULTS: Intrathecal 55,212-2, clonidine, and neostigmine dose-dependently suppressed the flinching observed during phase 1 and 2 in the formalin test. Isobolographic analysis revealed a synergistic interaction after intrathecal delivery of WIN 55,212-2-clonidine or WIN 55,212-2-neostigmine mixture in both phases. The antinociceptive effect of WIN 55,212-2 was antagonized by cannabinoid 1 receptor antagonist (AM 251) but not by cannabinoid 2 receptor antagonist (AM 630). No antinociceptive effect was seen after intrathecal administration of cannabinoid 2 receptor agonist (JWH 133). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal 55,212-2, clonidine, and neostigmine attenuate the facilitated state and acute pain. WIN 55,212-2 interacts synergistically with either clonidine or neostigmine. The antinociception of WIN 55,212-2 is mediated through the cannabinoid 1 receptor, but not the cannabinoid 2 receptor, at the spinal level.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

PubMed2006

Cannabinoid receptors in atherosclerosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent findings suggesting that cannabinoid receptors are potential targets for the treatment of atherosclerosis are reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Cannabinoids, such as Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the major psychoactive compound of marijuana, their synthetic analogs and endogenous cannabinoid ligands, produce their biological effects by interacting with specific receptors. In the apolipoprotein E knockout mouse model of atherosclerosis, Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol was shown to inhibit disease progression through pleiotropic effects on inflammatory cells. Blocking of cannabinoid receptor CB2, the main cannabinoid receptor expressed on immune cells, abolished the observed effects. The development of novel cannabinoid receptor ligands that selectively target CB2 receptors or pharmacological modulation of the endocannabinoid system might offer novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of atherosclerosis. Several reports demonstrating an implication of the endocannabinoid system in different inflammatory conditions support this hypothesis. SUMMARY: The immunomodulatory capacity of cannabinoids is now well established and suggests a broad therapeutic potential of cannabinoids for a variety of conditions, including atherosclerosis. New strategies based on nonpsychotropic cannabinoid receptor ligands or compounds modulating endocannabinoid synthesis or stability might solve the problem of the unwanted side effects associated with cannabinoid administration.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit neurogenic inflammations in guinea pig airways.

BACKGROUND: Although neurogenic inflammation via the activation of C fibers in the airway must have an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma, their regulatory mechanism remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The pharmacological profiles of endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists on the activation of C fibers in airway tissues were investigated and the mechanisms how cannabinoids regulate airway inflammatory reactions were clarified. METHODS: The effects of endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists on electrical field stimulation-induced bronchial smooth muscle contraction, capsaicin-induced bronchoconstriction and capsaicin-induced substance P release in guinea pig airway tissues were investigated. The influences of cannabinoid receptor antagonists and K+ channel blockers to the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on these respiratory reactions were examined. RESULTS: Both endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists, anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide, inhibited electrical field stimulation-induced guinea pig bronchial smooth muscle contraction, but not neurokinin A-induced contraction. A cannabinoid CB2 antagonist, SR 144528, reduced the inhibitory effect of endogenous agonists, but not a cannabinoid CB1 antagonist, SR 141716A. Inhibitory effects of agonists were also reduced by the pretreatment of large conductance Ca2+ -activated K+ channel (maxi-K+ channel) blockers, iberiotoxin and charybdotoxin, but not by other K+ channel blockers, dendrotoxin or glibenclamide. Anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide blocked the capsaicin-induced release of substance P-like immunoreactivity from guinea pig airway tissues. Additionally, intravenous injection of palmitoylethanolamide dose-dependently inhibited capsaicin-induced guinea pig bronchoconstriction, but not neurokinin A-induced reaction. However, anandamide did not reduce capsaicin-induced guinea pig bronchoconstriction. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit the activation of C fibers via cannabinoid CB2 receptors and maxi-K+ channels in guinea pig airways.

Amides↗

PubMed2000

Role of cannabinoid receptor in the brain as it relates to drug reward.

Understanding of cannabinoid (CB) actions has been remarkably advanced during the last decade, due mainly to the identification of the G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors, namely, CB1 receptors that are predominantly found in the brain and CB2 receptors that are exclusively found in peripheral tissues. Endogenous ligands for these receptors have also been identified. Research to date suggests that the analgesic effect of cannabinoids and the enhancement of opioid analgesia by cannabinoids are both CB1 receptor-mediated via the activation of opioid receptors. The involvement of the CB1 receptor in mediating reinforcing and physical dependence-producing effects of opioids has also been suggested, with the former being considered the result of interaction with the dopaminergic neurotransmission in the midbrain dopamine system. However, the discriminative stimulus effects of cannabinoids have been reported to be highly specific in that the effects were not substituted by other classes of compounds including opioidergic and dopaminergic agents nor were they antagonized by antagonists of various neurotransmission systems, suggesting that the discriminative stimulus effects only involve the cannabinoid system. Thus the cannabinoid actions appear to be classifiable into at least two kinds: 1) those mediated directly through cannabinoid receptors and 2) those mediated indirectly through other systems such as opioidergic systems. Detailed research into these actions may help to elucidate not only the mechanisms of action of exogenous cannabinoids but also the role of endogenous cannabinoids, especially in the brain reward system.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2005

Cannabinoid mechanisms of pain suppression.

A large body of literature indicates that cannabinoids suppress behavioral responses to acute and persistent noxious stimulation in animals. This review examines neuroanatomical, behavioral, and neurophysiological evidence supporting a role for cannabinoids in suppressing pain at spinal, supraspinal, and peripheral levels. Localization studies employing receptor binding and quantitative autoradiography, immunocytochemistry, and in situ hybridization are reviewed to examine the distribution of cannabinoid receptors at these levels and provide a neuroanatomical framework with which to understand the roles of endogenous cannabinoids in sensory processing. Pharmacological and transgenic approaches that have been used to study cannabinoid antinociceptive mechanisms are described. These studies provide insight into the functional roles of cannabinoid CB1 (CB1R) and CB2 (CB2R) receptor subtypes in cannabinoid antinociceptive mechanisms, as revealed in animal models of acute and persistent pain. The role of endocannabinoids and related fatty acid amides that are implicated in endogenous mechanisms for pain suppression are discussed. Human studies evaluating therapeutic potential of cannabinoid pharmacotherapies in experimental and clinical pain syndromes are evaluated. The potential of exploiting cannabinoid antinociceptive mechanisms in novel pharmacotherapies for pain is discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Time-course of the cannabinoid receptor down-regulation in the adult rat brain caused by repeated exposure to delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Recent studies have demonstrated that the pharmacological tolerance observed after prolonged exposure to plant or synthetic cannabinoids in adult individuals seems to have a pharmacodynamic rather than pharmacokinetic basis, because down-regulation of cannabinoid receptors was assessed in the brain of cannabinoid-tolerant rats. In the present study, we have examined the time-course of cannabinoid receptor down-regulation by analyzing cannabinoid receptor binding, using autoradiography, and mRNA expression, using in situ hybridization, in several brain structures of male adult rats daily exposed to delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) for 1, 3, 7, or 14 days. With only the exception of a few number of areas, most of the brain regions exhibited a progressive decrease in cannabinoid receptor binding. Two facts deserve to be mentioned. First, the pattern of this down-regulation process presented significant regional differences in terms of onset of the decrease and magnitude reached. Second, the loss of cannabinoid receptor binding was usually accompanied by no changes in its mRNA expression. Thus, some structures, such as most of the subfields of the Ammon's horn and the dentate gyrus in the hippocampus, exhibited a rapid (it appeared after the first injection) and marked (it reached approximately 30% of decrease after 14 days) reduction of cannabinoid receptor binding as a consequence of the daily delta9-THC administration. However, no changes occurred in mRNA levels. Decreased binding was also found in most of the basal ganglia, but the onset of this reduction was slow in the lateral caudate-putamen and the substantia nigra (it needed at least three days of daily delta9-THC administration), and, in particular, in the globus pallidus (more than 3 days). The magnitude of the decrease in binding was also more moderate, with maximal reductions always less than 28%. No changes were seen in the entopeduncular nucleus and only a trend in the medial caudate-putamen. However, the decrease in binding in some basal ganglia was, in this case, accompanied by a decrease in mRNA levels in the lateral caudate-putamen, but this appeared after 7 days of daily delta9-THC administration and, hence, after the onset of binding decrease. In the limbic structures, cannabinoid receptor binding decreased in the septum nuclei (it needed at least 3 days of daily delta9-THC administration), tended to diminish in the nucleus accumbens and was unaltered in the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus, with no changes in mRNA levels in these last two regions. Binding also decreased in the superficial and deep layers of the cerebral cortex, but only accompanied by trends in mRNA expression. The decrease in binding was initiated promptly in the deep layer (after the first injection) and it reached more than 30% of reduction after 14 days of daily delta9-THC administration, whereas, in the superficial layer, it needed more than 3 days of daily delta9-THC administration and reached less than 30% of reduction. Finally, no changes in binding and mRNA levels were found in the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus. In summary, the daily administration of delta9-THC resulted in a progressive decrease in cannabinoid receptor binding in most of the brain areas studied, and it was a fact that always occurred before the changes in mRNA expression in those areas where these existed. The onset of the decrease in binding exhibited regional differences with areas, such as most of the hippocampal structures and the deep layer of the cerebral cortex, where the decrease occurred after the first administration. Other structures, however, needed at least 3 days or more to initiate receptor binding decrease. Two structures, the entopeduncular nucleus and the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, were unresponsive to chronic delta9-THC administration, whereas others, the medial caudate-putamen and the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus, only exhibited trends.

Animals↗

PubMed1983

Models to predict cannabinoid-induced disturbances.

The most commonly used animal models to evaluate the psychoactivity of cannabinoids have been reviewed. The need for suitable models is acute considering the present interest to develop drugs based on the cannabinoid moiety but preferably dissociated from psychoactivity. Conceivably, a satisfactory assay should show features of cannabinoid-induced disturbances relevant to man as well as sensitivity, specificity and simplicity. These requisites seemed better fulfilled in the monkey model. Various lines of evidence have demonstrated the close pattern of the behavioural response to psychoactive and inactive cannabinoids in man and monkeys. Rhesus monkeys showed development of tolerance and withdrawal symptoms, which have been frequently reported in humans after prolonged exposure to cannabinoids. The exposure was reported also to cause in monkeys alterations of electrical activity and organic damage in deep brain structures. The monkey model has been particularly useful to determine the relative potency of naturally occurring cannabinoids and metabolites, which was adequately compared to that in man, and to establish the structural requirements for psychoactivity in large series of synthetic new compounds. In addition it appeared that rhesus monkeys react similarly to man with respect to proposed antidotes against cannabinoids. Four newly synthetized amino-cannabinoids were tested in baboons. All these compounds were virtually void of typical cannabinoid psychoactivity but two trans-analogs differed from the cis-analogs in that they provoked bouts of vigorous scratching and yawning. This unusual drug-effect, at difference from scratching alone has not been previously observed after administration of cannabinoids. In this presentation some terms of cannabis terminology have been discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Suppression of the humoral immune response by cannabinoids is partially mediated through inhibition of adenylate cyclase by a pertussis toxin-sensitive G-protein coupled mechanism.

Cannabinoid compounds, including the major psychoactive component of marihuana, delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC), have been widely established as being inhibitory on a broad array of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. The presence of cannabinoid receptors has been identified recently on mouse spleen cells, which possess structural and functional characteristics similar to those of the G-protein coupled cannabinoid receptor originally identified in rat brain. These findings, together with those demonstrating that delta 9-THC inhibits adenylate cyclase in splenocytes, strongly suggest that certain aspects of immune inhibition by cannabinoids may be mediated through a cannabinoid receptor-associated mechanism. The objective of the present studies was to determine whether inhibition of adenylate cyclase is relevant to mouse spleen cell immune function and, if so, whether this inhibition is mediated through a Gi-protein coupled mechanism as previously described in neuronal tissue. Spleen cell activation by the phorbol ester phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA), plus the calcium ionophore ionomycin, produced a rapid but transient increase in cytosolic cAMP, which was inhibited completely by immunosuppressive concentrations of delta 9-THC (22 microM) and the synthetic bicyclic cannabinoid CP-55940 (5.2 microM), which produced no effect on cell viability. Inhibition by cannabinoids of lymphocyte proliferative responses to PMA plus ionomycin and sheep erythrocyte (sRBC) IgM antibody-forming cell (AFC) response, was abrogated completely by low concentrations of dibutyryl-cAMP (10-100 microM). Inhibition of the sRBC AFC response by both delta 9-THC (22 microM) and CP-55940 (5.2 microM) was also abrogated by preincubation of splenocytes for 24 hr with pertussis toxin (0.1-100 ng/mL). Pertussis toxin pretreatment of spleen cells was also found to directly abrogate cannabinoid inhibition of adenylate cyclase, as measured by forskolin-stimulated accumulation of intracellular cAMP. These results indicate that inhibition of the sRBC AFC response by cannabinoids is mediated, at least in part, by inhibition of adenylate cyclase through a pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi-protein coupled cannabinoid receptor. Additionally, these studies further support the premise that cAMP is an important mediator of lymphocyte activation.

Adenylate Cyclase Toxin↗

PubMed1996

Role of cyclic AMP in the actions of cannabinoid receptors.

Cannabinoids, including delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), bind to receptors that couple to Gi/o-proteins and inhibit adenylyl cyclase. However, like other G-protein-coupled receptors, cannabinoid receptors are also coupled to other effector systems. This review examines the characteristics of the cannabinoid-G-protein-adenylyl cyclase system, and explores the role of cyclic AMP in mediating effects of these drugs. Several conclusions emerge from this research. First, the principal actions of cannabinoids are mediated through G-protein-coupled receptors, and the intracellular signaling mechanism that initiates cellular response of cannabinoids is activation of G-proteins. Second, cannabinoid-inhibited adenylyl cyclase is only one of several different effectors coupled to these receptors, and different effectors may be used for different types of responses. Third, cannabinoid inhibition of adenylyl cyclase plays an important role in several aspects of cannabinoid function, including modulating conductance at a voltage-dependent K+ channel ("A" current) in the hippocampus, thus providing an effective rationale for behavioral effects of cannabinoids mediated in this region. Other functions of this system may include production of long-term changes in gene expression by inhibition of cyclic AMP response elements on strategic genes, and inhibition of anandamide synthesis, thus mediating some of the long-term effects of cannabinoids on neuronal function.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Antiemetic and motor-depressive actions of CP55,940: cannabinoid CB1 receptor characterization, distribution, and G-protein activation.

Dibenzopyran (Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) and aminoalkylindole [R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrolol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl) methanone mesylate; (WIN55,212-2)] cannabinoids suppress vomiting produced by cisplatin via cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. This study investigates the antiemetic potential of the "nonclassical" cannabinoid CP55,940 [1alpha,2beta-(R)-5alpha]-(-)-5-(1,1-dimethyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexyl-phenol] against cisplatin-induced vomiting and assesses the presence and functionality of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva) brain. CP55,940 (0.025-0.3 mg/kg) reduced both the frequency of cisplatin-induced emesis (ID(50)=0.025 mg/kg) and the percentage of shrews vomiting (ID(50)=0.09 mg/kg). CP55,940 also suppressed shrew motor behaviors (ID(50)=0.06- 0.21 mg/kg) at such doses. The antiemetic and motor-suppressant actions of CP55,940 were countered by SR141716A [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide], indicating both effects are cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-mediated. Autoradiographic studies with [3H]-SR141716A and [35S]-GTPgammaS binding revealed that the distribution of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and its activation pattern are similar to rodent brain and significant levels are present in brain loci (e.g., nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS)) that control emesis. The affinity rank order of structurally diverse cannabinoid ligands for cannabinoid CB(1) receptor in shrew brain is similar to rodent brain: HU-210=CP55,940=SR141716A>/=WIN55,212-2>/=delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol>methanandamide=HU-211=cannabidiol=2-arachidonoylglycerol. This affinity order is also similar and is highly correlated to the cannabinoid EC(50) potency rank order for GTPgammaS stimulation except WIN55,212-2 and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol potency order were reversed. The affinity and the potency rank order of tested cannabinoids were significantly correlated with their antiemetic ID(50) potency order against cisplatin-induced vomiting (CP55,940>WIN55,212-2=delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) as well as emesis produced by 2-arachidonoylglycerol or SR141716A (CP55,940>WIN55,212-2>delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol).

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Cellular localization of cannabinoid receptors and activated G-proteins in rat anterior cingulate cortex.

Cannabinoid receptors are found in moderate density throughout the cerebral cortex. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is of particular interest due its high level of cannabinoid receptors and role in behaviors known to be modulated by cannabinoids. These studies were conducted to determine the cellular localization of cannabinoid receptors and to compare the level of cannabinoid receptor binding with receptor-mediated G-protein activity in the rat ACC. Either ibotenic acid or undercut lesions were made in ACC, and brains were processed for [3H]WIN 55,212-2 and WIN 55,212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography. Both cannabinoid receptors and receptor-activated G-proteins were highest in laminae I and VI of ACC in control tissue. Although similar levels of receptor binding were found in these laminae, significantly higher levels of receptor-activated G-proteins were found in lamina VI. Ibotenic acid lesions that destroyed ACC neurons decreased [3H]WIN 55,212-2 binding by 60-70% and eliminated WIN 55,212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. In contrast, deafferentation of the ACC with undercut lesions had no significant effect on cannabinoid receptor binding or G-protein activation. These results indicate that cannabinoid receptors in laminae I and VI of the ACC are located on somatodendritic elements or axons intrinsic to the ACC. In addition, differences in the relative levels of cannabinoid binding sites and activated G-proteins between cortical laminae indicate that the efficiency of cannabinoid receptors for G-protein activation may vary within a specific brain region.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Lack of response suppression follows repeated ventral tegmental cannabinoid administration: an in vitro electrophysiological study.

Cannabinoid compounds have been reported to excite ventral tegmental neurons through activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. More recently, biochemical and whole-cell voltage-clamp studies carried out on CB1-transfected AtT20 cells have shown a rapid desensitization of these receptors following activation of protein kinase C by 4-alpha-phorbol. To investigate the possible physiological correlates of this phenomenon, we have studied the effects of repeated cannabinoid treatment on ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neuronal firing in vitro. Rat brain slices containing the ventral tegmental area were used for single-unit extracellular recordings. Only neurons meeting established electrophysiological and pharmacological criteria for dopaminergic neurons were used in the study (firing neurons were detected either using tungsten or glass microelectrodes). The high-affinity cannabinoid agonist HU210 produced a concentration-dependent increase in firing (1-15 microM; EC(50) approximately 7 microM). Initial HU210 exposure produced a significant increase in cell firing rate in the ventral tegmental area, with a maximum approximately 3.5-fold increase over pre-drug basal firing; a subsequent exposure to HU210 produced an approximately threefold increase over basal firing. Nevertheless, the duration and onset of excitation produced by the cannabinoid differed significantly between the first and second exposures; the first excitation lasted significantly longer than the second and required less time to reach a comparable change in firing rate. The increases in firing rate and the time to return to basal firing were not significantly different between exposures. Furthermore, the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A completely prevented the HU210-induced excitation whilst having no effect on its own, thus indicating a CB1-receptor mediated mechanism for the observed increase in firing. Ventral tegmental area neurons are also excited by the GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline. To assess the role of GABA in cannabinoid-mediated excitation, HU210 was added in the presence of bicuculline. HU210 did not affect the initial bicuculline-induced increase in firing, suggesting different sites of action for the two compounds. Our data fail to support previously reported findings using repeated cannabinoid administration and cell preparations. The maintained increase in DA drive elicited by the potent cannabinoid agonist HU210 in the in vitro ventral tegmental circuit could explain some of the behavioural properties of cannabinoids, such as the lack of tolerance for the psychotropic effects of marijuana seen in human users.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1996

Suppression of noxious stimulus-evoked expression of Fos protein-like immunoreactivity in rat spinal cord by a selective cannabinoid agonist.

In rats, cannabinoids inhibit behavioral responses to noxious stimulation with a potency and efficacy similar to that of morphine. However, because cannabinoids depress motor function, it has not been possible to state beyond any doubt that these effects were related to a dampening of noxious sensory input. Therefore, c-fos immunocytochemistry was used to explore the possibility that cannabinoids reduce behavioral responses to noxious stimuli by decreasing spinal processing of nociceptive inputs. Rats received systemic injections of the potent and selective cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2, the receptor-inactive enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle prior to observations in a model of tonic pain, the formalin test. As demonstrated previously, plantar injections of formalin led to lifting and licking of the injected paw, with two peaks of activity occurring at 5 and 30 min after injection. The cannabinoid agonist suppressed these pain responses and produced a reduction in mobility. Immunocytochemical processing of sections with an antibody to the Fos protein revealed that the cannabinoid markedly suppressed pain-evoked c-fos expression in the superficial and neck regions of the spinal dorsal horn, but not in the nucleus proprius. Decreased expression of c-fos also occurred in the ventral horn. The specificity of this effect and its probable mediation by cannabinoid receptors are suggested by three findings: (i) the suppression by the drug of both behavioral and immunocytochemical responses to pain was dose-dependent; (ii) neither the behavioral nor the immunocytochemical response to the noxious stimulus was significantly affected by the receptor-inactive enantiomer of the agonist; (iii) animals rendered tolerant to cannabinoids by repeated injections of the agonist showed reduced responses to the drug. These findings suggest that cannabinoids inhibit the spinal processing of nociceptive stimuli and support the notion that endogenous cannabinoids may act naturally to modify pain trnasmission within the central nervous system.

Animals↗