SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Comparative Genomic Hybridization”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

[Genetic alterations in sinonasal adenocarcinoma in wood workers studies with comparative genomic hybridization].

Eleven wood-workers with sinonasal adenocarcinoma were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. This technique serves as a screening test for regions of copy number changes in tumor genomes. We have applied the technique to map DNA gains and losses in 9 cases of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors and 2 cases of frozen tumors. Gains were found most frequently than losses. Whole arm chromosomic gains were detected in high frequencies at 8q, 7q, 12q and 18p and losses at 18q, 8p, 10q, 5q, 14q and 17p. The segment most frequently amplified was 18p11.1-q11 (45%), even though others like 7q21-22 (18%) were related with lower survival rates. This analysis allows us to know for the first time the chromosomic aberrations that occur and may play an important role in sinonasal adenocarcinoma. In the future, comparative genomic hybridization could be used in the woodworkers with long exposition to wood dust to detect initial genetic aberrations and obtain an early treatment and diagnosis of the disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2000

Novel genomic imbalances in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma revealed by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization: an intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study.

A comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) approach provides identification of genomic gains and losses in a tumor specimen in a single experiment. Only 11 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas (E-RMS) have previously been subjected to CGH. The underlying genetic events in this histologic subtype are not well defined. In this investigation, 12 E-RMS specimens from 10 patients entered into Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) I-IV and two local patients were analyzed by CGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Gains of chromosomes or chromosomal regions 2 (50%), 7 (42%), 8 (67%), 11 (42%), 12 (58%), 13q21 (33%), and 20 (33%) and losses of 1p35-36.3 (42%), 6 (33%), 9q22 (33%), 14q21-32 (25%), and 17 (25%) were most prominent. Chromosomal regions 1p35-36.3 and 9q22 represent novel regions of loss. Importantly, loss of 9q22 corresponds to the locus of a putative tumor suppressor gene (PTCH), which has been shown to play a role in rhabdomyosarcoma in a mouse model of Gorlin syndrome. Loss of 1p36 corresponds to the locus for PAX7, a paired box containing gene characteristically altered in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Moreover, loss of 1p36 is prominent in another common pediatric soft tissue tumor, neuroblastoma. Gains of 2, 7, 8, 12, and 13 and loss of 14 were seen in the sole prior E-RMS CGH series; thus, these data provide important confirmatory results. In contrast to this previous study, however loss, not gain, of chromosome 17 was observed in the current study. Chromosome 17 loss correlates well with previous descriptions of frequent allelic loss of 17p (TP53) in E-RMS. In summary, CGH and FISH analyses of 12 E-RMS specimens revealed novel genomic imbalances that may be useful in directing further molecular studies for the determination of E-RMS critically involved genes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Specific loss of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21 in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas revealed by comparative genomic hybridization.

We analyzed 19 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas by means of comparative genomic hybridization. Two tumors revealed no numerical abnormalities. In the remaining 17 cases we found loss of entire chromosomes with underrepresentation of chromosome 1 occurring in all 17 cases; loss of chromosomes 2, 10, and 13 in 16 cases; loss of chromosomes 6 and 21 in 15 tumors; and loss of chromosome 17 in 13 cases. The loss of the Y chromosome was observed in 6 of 13 tumors from male patients, whereas 1 X chromosome was lost in 3 of 4 tumors obtained from females. Comparative genomic hybridization results were verified by interphase cytogenetics. We conclude that a specific combination of multiple chromosomal losses characterizes chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and may help to differentiate them unequivocally from other types of kidney cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis identifies gains of 1p35 approximately p36 and chromosome 19 in osteosarcoma.

Osteosarcomas (OS) are aggressive tumors of the bone and often have a poor prognosis. Conventional cytogenetic analyses of OS have revealed highly complex karyotypes, with numerous abnormalities. In this study, we analyzed 18 untreated OS tumors from 17 patients of the younger incidence age group by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), 4 tumors by spectral karyotyping (SKY) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Comparative genomic hybridization identified frequent copy number changes of the chromosomal region 1p (10/17) and gain of part or all of chromosome 19(8/17). In addition gains were observed at 5p(3/17), 8q(3/17), 16p(3/17), and 17p(5/17); and losses at chromosomes 2q(3/17), 10(4/17) and 13(3/17). High level gains were detected in the 8q23 approximately q24 region in two tumors as well as at 17p in one primary and a metastatic tumor. Minimal regions of gain were present at 1p35 approximately p36.3 (8/17); 5p14 approximately p15.2 (3/17), and 8q22 approximately q24.3 (3/17). SKY analysis demonstrated that OS has a complex pattern of clonal and non-clonal rearrangements and helped confirm the structural basis for the imbalances detected by CGH. Spectral karyotyping confirmed an overall pattern of chromosomal gain affecting 1p in all four tumors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis from these tumors confirmed the gain of the 1p36 region in 2 tumors as determined by CGH analysis as well as the amplification of 8q.

Bone Neoplasms↗

PubMed2005

Comparative genomic hybridization using DNA from laser capture microdissected tissue.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a powerful screening technique that can identify regions of gain and loss within the whole genome in a single experiment. The combination of laser capture microdissection, whole-genome amplification, and CGH permits genomic screening with high specificity and sensitivity. This complement of techniques has enabled analysis of focal regions and subpopulations of cells within a tissue, which has previously been difficult, providing insight into disease progression and heterogeneity. This chapter outlines the techniques involved in producing labeled probes from DNA extracted from laser capture microdissected material and the methods for hybridization of these probes to metaphase chromosomes. This protocol can also be applied to the preparation of probes for CGH arrays.

DNA, Neoplasm↗

PubMed1996

Genetic alterations in untreated metastases and androgen-independent prostate cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization and allelotyping.

A newly developed method of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) employing quantitative statistical comparisons was applied to DNA from two different types of advanced prostate cancer tissue. Multiple CGH analyses were obtained for each chromosome in each tumor, and the results of point-by-point comparison of the mean tumor:normal color ratio to a control normal:normal color ratio in each of 1247 evenly distributed data channels constituting the entire human genome were interpreted as loss, gain, or no change in copy number in the tumor genome. Group I tissue was obtained from prostate cancer metastases from 20 patients, 19 of whom had received no prior prostate cancer treatment. This DNA also was analyzed by Southern and microsatellite allelotyping at 53 different loci on 20 different chromosome arms. CGH results agreed with allelotyping results at 92% of the informative loci studied. These samples, which contained highly enriched tumor DNA, showed the highest rates of alteration yet reported in several chromosomal regions known to be altered frequently in prostate cancer: 8q gain (85%), 8p loss (80%), 13q loss (75%), 16q loss (55%), 17p loss (50%), and 10q loss (50%). Group II tissue was obtained predominately from primary or recurrent tumor from 11 patients who had been treated with long-term androgen-deprivation therapy and developed androgen-independent metastatic disease. Quantitative CGH analysis on DNA from these tissues showed chromosomal alterations that were very similar to those found in group I, suggesting that untreated metastatic tumors contain the bulk of chromosomal alterations necessary for recurrence to occur during androgen deprivation. In the entire data set, a number of previously undetected regions of frequent loss or gain were identified, including losses of chromosomes 2q (42%), 5q (39%), 6q (39%), and 15q (39%) and gains of chromosomes 11p (52%), 1q (52%), 3q (52%), and 2p (45%). Chi-squared analysis showed a significantly higher frequency of gain of the 4q25-q28 region in tumors from African-American patients, indicating a possible oncogene whose activation may play a role in the higher rate of progression seen in this ethnic group. Additional study of these frequently altered regions may provide insight into the mechanism of prostate cancer progression and lead to important tools for tumor-specific prognosis and therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

BAC to the future! or oligonucleotides: a perspective for micro array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH).

The array CGH technique (Array Comparative Genome Hybridization) has been developed to detect chromosomal copy number changes on a genome-wide and/or high-resolution scale. It is used in human genetics and oncology, with great promise for clinical application. Until recently primarily PCR amplified bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) or cDNAs have been spotted as elements on the array. The large-scale DNA isolations or PCR amplifications of the large-insert clones necessary for manufacturing the arrays are elaborate and time-consuming. Lack of a high-resolution highly sensitive (commercial) alternative has undoubtedly hindered the implementation of array CGH in research and diagnostics. Recently, synthetic oligonucleotides as arrayed elements have been introduced as an alternative substrate for array CGH, both by academic institutions as well as by commercial providers. Oligonucleotide libraries or ready-made arrays can be bought off-the-shelf saving considerable time and efforts. For RNA expression profiling, we have seen a gradual transition from in-house printed cDNA-based expression arrays to oligonucleotide arrays and we expect a similar transition for array CGH. This review compares the different platforms and will attempt to shine a light on the 'BAC to the future' of the array CGH technique.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

PubMed1992

Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.

Comparative genomic hybridization produces a map of DNA sequence copy number as a function of chromosomal location throughout the entire genome. Differentially labeled test DNA and normal reference DNA are hybridized simultaneously to normal chromosome spreads. The hybridization is detected with two different fluorochromes. Regions of gain or loss of DNA sequences, such as deletions, duplications, or amplifications, are seen as changes in the ratio of the intensities of the two fluorochromes along the target chromosomes. Analysis of tumor cell lines and primary bladder tumors identified 16 different regions of amplification, many in loci not previously known to be amplified.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMed2000

Importance of using comparative genomic hybridization to improve detection of chromosomal changes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and conventional cytogenetics (CC) to define chromosomal changes and to evaluate the usefulness of CGH in 65 patients having childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Subsequently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to evaluate the CGH and cytogenetic results. Comparative genomic hybridization revealed DNA copy number changes in 49 (75%) patients (including 7 patients with unsuccessful cytogenetics and 2 patients with normal karyotype). A total of 85 losses and 195 gains were detected. The most commonly gained chromosomes were 21 (35%), X (31%), 18 (27%), 10 (26%), 6 (25%), 17 (25%), 4 (23%), and 14 (22%). Losses were most frequently observed on chromosomes 9p (18%) and 12p (11%). Other losses were detected on chromosomes 13q (9%), 6q (9%), 7p (8%), and chromosome X (6%). Conventional cytogenetics revealed chromosomal changes in 53 (82%) patients. The employment of CGH and FISH together with CC analysis revealed chromosomal changes in 62 (95%) of the childhood ALL patients investigated. The CGH completed CC results in 36 patients; in 9 patients, the changes escaped detection without using CGH. The results of our study were compared to 6 other CGH studies previously reported. Our observations underline the benefits of supplementing routine cytogenetic investigation in childhood ALL by FISH and CGH, because small unbalanced changes may escape detection when conventional cytogenetics is the only diagnostic method used.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Comparative genomic hybridization: a comparison with molecular and cytogenetic analysis.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a powerful technique for detecting copy number changes throughout the genome. We describe the development of a versatile image analysis program for CGH studies. Several methods for the production of metaphases which give optimum hybridization signals have also been assessed. CGH analysis was performed on DNA samples from several different and clinically relevant specimens: amniotic fluid cells trisomic for a single chromosome, lymphoblastoid cell lines with abnormalities involving single chromosome bands, malignant cell lines and biopsy material from primary ovarian carcinomas. The results were compared with those derived from G-banding, chromosome painting, and molecular genetic techniques. Our data demonstrate that CGH was able to detect a wide range of quantitative genetic alterations including duplication or deletion of single chromosome bands. CGH analysis also indicated the presence of genetic abnormalities that were not detected by other cytogenetic or molecular approaches. Moreover, our CGH methodology allowed the ready comparison of CGH results from different tumors, a process which greatly facilitated identification of shared genetic changes.

Amniotic Fluid↗

PubMed2002

[Comparative genomic hybridization as a new method for detection of genomic imbalance].

Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) is a molecular cytogenetic analysis that allows identification of genomic changes by comparing the copy number of DNA sequences in cells of tested tissue and the reference specimen. CGH is based on competitive suppressive in situ hybridization of two differently labeled DNA probes (tested and reference, karyotypically normal, fluorochrome-labeled DNAs) with metaphase chromosomes of a healthy subject. First described by Kallioniemi et al. in 1992, the CGH assay has been widely used for identification and characterization of both numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities in cells of different tissues at various pathological conditions in humans, especially in tumor diseases. We discuss the specific features and quality control of comparative genomic hybridization, its advantages and limitations in detection of genomic imbalance and the prospects for development of this technology.

Chromosomes, Human↗

PubMed2002

Identification of four distinct regions of allelic imbalances on chromosome 1 by the combined comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis on hepatocellular carcinoma.

Frequent chromosome 1 abnormalities detected in human hepatocellular carcinoma have been implicated in early genetic events of liver carcinogenesis. Recurrent loss of 1p with a common deleted region 1p36-p34 has been reported from microsatellite analysis, whereas common gain of the whole chromosome q-arm was described from several comparative genomic hybridization studies. The relationships between copy number changes and allelic status however remains unclear. In this study, we have conducted a simultaneous comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis study on chromosome 1 in 31 hepatocellular carcinoma cases. Microsatellite analysis revealed frequent loss of heterozygosity on 1p at loci D1S468 (74%), D1S450 (67%), D1S2667 (65%), D1S2697 (75%), D1S199 (52%), and D1S234 (67%) corresponded to the distal 1p36 region and coincided with 12 cases (86%) that presented losses on 1p by comparative genomic hybridization analysis. Although comparative genomic hybridization indicated a common deleted region of 1p36-p35 in the current series, microsatellite analysis has refined the smallest overlapping region (SOR) to 1p36.13-p36.22. Gain of 1q as revealed by comparative genomic hybridization suggested low and high-level gains, and cases that displayed an amplicon below the heterochromatic region 1q21-q25. Common allelic imbalances of polymorphic markers D1S2635 (64%), D1S484 (67%), D1S2878 (65%), D1S196 (70%), D1S249 (64%) D1S2785 (75%), D1S2842 (73%) and D1S2836 (74%) that corresponded to the regions 1q23.1-q24.2, 1q32.1 and 1q43-q44 were detected. Three distinct regions of allelic imbalances were thus suggested on recurring 1q gain found in hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, microsatellite analysis has enabled a mapping of common overrepresented regions and suggested SOR on 1q23.1-q23.3 (D1S2635-D1S2878), 1q25.1-q31.1 (D1S452-D1S238), and 1q43 (D1S2785-D1S2842). Our current study has refined chromosome 1 aberrations in hepatocellular carcinoma to four regions of allelic imbalances. The SORs delineated should provide basis for further molecular investigation in hepatocarcinogenesis on genes residing on these chromosomal regions.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded uveal melanomas.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to analyze seven autologous uveal melanomas with both formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fresh-frozen specimens. In addition, DNA from two archival formalin-fixed tumors more than 45 years old were also analyzed. The most frequent genetic changes were loss of chromosome 3; increase in copy number of 6p and loss of 6q; and increase in copy number of 8q. A comparison of CGH data from the fresh-frozen tumors and their autologous formalin-fixed tumors revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.83. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of 45-year-old specimens identified genetic changes similar to those found in more recent tumors including loss of chromosome 3 and increase in copy numbers of 6p and 8q. The results indicate that there is a good agreement between data obtained from formalin-fixed and fresh-frozen specimens using CGH. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the applicability of this technique in analyzing archival formalin-fixed tumors that were previously not accessible to cytogenetic analysis.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2006

Detecting sex chromosome anomalies and common triploidies in products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) has moved to the forefront of molecular cytogenetics with its ability to rapidly characterize chromosome abnormalities at resolutions much higher than routine chromosome banding. However, array CGH, like all CGH procedures, has heretofore been deemed unable to detect ploidy, a major cause of fetal demise and spontaneous miscarriage. METHOD: We recently developed a CGH microarray that is designed for detecting aneuploidy and unbalanced chromosome rearrangements. Here, we introduce the use of a Klinefelter male cell line (47,XXY) as a control for array CGH analyses on products of conception (POCs). RESULTS: This approach facilitates the detection of common trisomies and monosomies of the sex chromosomes by reducing the analysis to the identification of single copy gains or losses. Furthermore, in a blinded study, careful interpretation of the microarray results with particular attention to the sex chromosome ratios between the patient sample and the control allowed for the detection of some common triploidies. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that using a chromosomally abnormal cell line in array CGH analysis can be applied to other CGH platforms and that array CGH, when properly performed and analyzed, is a powerful tool that can detect most chromosomal abnormalities observed in a clinical setting including some polyploidies.

Aneuploidy↗

PubMed1996

[Comparative genomic hybridization. A screening method in genetic tumor diagnosis].

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a new method of screening a tumor for genetic changes. The alterations are classified as DNA gains and losses and reveal a characteristic pattern that includes mutations at the chromosomal and subchromosomal levels. Although DNA from fresh-frozen tissue is recommended as the starting material, archival specimens can also be analyzed. Various examples are presented that illustrate the changes that occur in different tumor entities, and preneoplastic lesions, the differentiation of primary tumors from metastases, and the investigation of tumor cell lines that are resistant to cytostatic drugs. These examples emphasize that CGH can extend the possibilities for genetic diagnosis in tumor pathology.

Cell Line↗

PubMed2001

Amplification at 9p in cervical carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization.

DNA copy number changes were studied by comparative genomic hybridization on 10 tumor specimens of squamous cell carcinoma of cervix obtained from Korean patients. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded sections after removal of non-malignant cells by microdissection technique. Copy number changes were found in 8/10 tumors. The most frequent changes were chromosome 19 gains (n=6) and losses on chromosomes 4 (n=4), 5 (n=3), and 3p (n=3). A novel finding was amplification in chromosome arm 9p21-pter in 2 cases. Gains in 1, 3q, 5p, 6p, 8q, 16p, 17, and 20q and losses at 2q, 6q, 8p, 9q, 10p, 11, 13, 16q, and 18q were observed in at least one of the cases.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Comparative genomic hybridization and multiplex-fluorescence in situ hybridization: an appraisal in elderly patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and multiplex-fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) were used to evaluate the presentation karyotype in 15 and 18 patients respectively, aged >/=60 years, with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Conventional G-banded analysis was performed in all patients prior to evaluation. Comparative genomic hybridization confirmed the G-banded karyotype fully in 12 patients and partially in two patients. Normal CGH profiles were observed in patients with a normal karyotype and in one patient with a balanced chromosomal translocation as the sole cytogenetic aberration. Multiplex-fluorescence in situ hybridization provided additional information in two patients with a complex karyotype, but failed to detect a telomeric translocation in one patient. Eight patients with normal G-banded karyotypes appeared normal by M-FISH. These results demonstrate that both CGH and M-FISH analysis correlate well with the G-banded karyotype in AML. Furthermore, although additive cytogenetic data was not provided by either technique in cases with normal karyotype, DNA copy number change and cryptic translocations below the resolution of CGH and M-FISH may still be the initiating event for leukemogenesis for these patients.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

The application of comparative genomic hybridization to previously karyotyped cervical cancer cell lines.

This investigation is concerned with the application of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to DNA from previously fully karyotyped cervical cancer cell lines using G-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to compare the chromosome copy numbers observed in karyotypes with the profile shifts seen in CGH analysis. It has demonstrated that diploid DNA can be used as a reference to cohybridize with a test sample of any modal number because of the proportional representation of every chromosome arm and region in equal volumes of both test and reference DNAs. Profile shifts in the near-diploid line gave a clear indication of over and under-representation of either the whole or parts of chromosome arms. In near-tetraploid samples, profile shifts, either gain or loss due to copy number changes from four to five, five to six, or four to three were smaller and were not always seen; however, the points of profile shift would have allowed us to work out most of the breakpoints if karyotype information had not been available. The profiles, however, did not provide accurate information on the ploidy status; this would need to be measured by other means for the CGH data to be interpreted correctly. The 3q and 8q gain in all the squamous cell carcinoma cell lines appeared very clearly. Comparative genomic hybridization revealed a new breakpoint at 7q31 which was not detected originally on the karyotype in DE3. A breakpoint on 9q was reassigned on the basis of the profile shift from 9q13 to 9q22 in JE6. Clarification of the origin of a small fragment from chromosome 20 constantly present in JE6 showed it to be 20q22-qter.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗