PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTAL MATERIALS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Allergies to dental materials.

Allergies related to dentistry generally constitute delayed hypersensitive reactions to specific dental materials. Although true allergic hypersensitivity to dental materials is rare, certain products have definite allergenic properties. Extensive reports in the literature substantiate that certain materials cause allergies in patients, who exhibit mucosal and skin symptoms. Currently, however, neither substantial data nor clinical experience unequivocally contraindicate the discontinuance of any of the materials, which include dental amalgam and nickel- and chromium-containing metals. The dentist forms a vital link in the team approach to the differential diagnosis of allergenic biomaterials that elicit symptoms in a patient, not only intraorally, but also on unrelated parts of the body.

Acrylic Resins↗

A problem with modern dental materials.

It may come as a surprise to learn that there is more than one discipline in medicine dealing with artificial organs. The obvious one is bio-engineering, which is largely concerned with fashioning existing biologically acceptable materials into useful spare parts such as hip or knee joints. The materials themselves hardly change, and the difference between rival prostheses lies more in design than novel chemistry. This is the world of titanium or cobalt-chromium joint designs, bone screws and plates, orthotic limbs, supports and wheelchairs, and futuristic ideas such as miniature video cameras for artificial eyes.

Biocompatible Materials↗

Screening tests for systemic effects of dental materials.

Due to the minimal release of compounds from most materials, systemic toxicity effects caused by dental materials have been considered to occur very seldomly or not at all. Screening tests for systemic toxicity are therefore justified only with certain body contact for long periods of time with a dental product. The international standardization on biological evaluation of medical devices has demonstrated a need for improved screening tests and continuous revision of the standards for testing. It is obvious that certain published studies on systemic effects of dental materials and some proposed test methods do not reflect today's demand for toxicokinetic and organ effect studies.

Absorption↗

Tissue response to allergenic leachables from dental materials.

In addition to toxic reactions to dental materials, some individuals may develop or exhibit hypersensitivity reactions to leachable components. An experimental model combining the guinea pig maximization test for induction of hypersensitivity and the subcutaneous implantation of dental cements is described. Guinea pigs immunized with AH 26, an epoxy-bisphenol resin, showed an increased tissue response to AH26 implants. Guinea pigs immunized with zinc oxide-eugenol did not show a similarly increased response, possibly because of an anti-inflammatory effect of eugenol. The experimental model may prove useful in predicting the effect of leachable allergens from dental materials in sensitized individuals.

Allergens↗

Xenoestrogenicity and dental materials.

This paper discusses the xenoestrogenicity of dental materials due to 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl) propane (Bisphenol-A or BPA) and/or its derivatives. Based on a critical review of the pertinent published literature, the author concludes that there is no reason to change the indications for the clinical application of these dental materials.

Adhesives↗

Dental materials science--the maintenance of standards.

Standards for dental materials are available for both biological and chemical/physical properties. In order to predict the clinical performance of a material by means of standard tests, both the test and the method used in the test should ideally simulate clinical usage. However, owing to lack of knowledge with regard to intra-oral failure modes, and technical considerations in the performance of tests, this ideal may not always be achieved.

Biocompatible Materials↗

MR imaging artifacts produced by dental materials.

This report evaluates a variety of dental materials with respect to MR imaging artifacts and their mechanisms of production. A 0.15-T superconducting system and an MR phantom were used in assessing imaging artifacts. Several in-vivo studies were also carried out. The dental materials were analyzed for composition and magnetic permeability and the results were compared with the artifacts produced by each material. It was found that the higher the magnetic permeability the greater the artifact produced. Magnetic permeability of a material is generally not predictable on the basis of its composition, however.

Dental Materials↗