PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Decision Making”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Collaborative medical decision making.

Collaborative decision making occurs whenever two or more individuals contribute their diverse knowledge and expertise to the decision-making process. In medicine, this happens during morning rounds, case conferences, consultations, and elsewhere. This paper presents an analysis of collaborative medical decision making, focusing on two factors that can powerfully influence the kind of information that gets discussed, and hence the nature of the decisions that are made. These are 1) the pre-discussion distribution of problem-relevant information/knowledge, and 2) each participant's awareness of other individuals' knowledge and talents. The authors review previous psychological research on group decision making that concerns these factors, and call attention to several lines of inquiry that might fruitfully be pursued in clinical settings.

Decision Support Techniques↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

An instrument for measuring patients' preferences for two identified dimensions of autonomy, their desire to make medical decisions and their desire to be informed, was developed and tested for reliability and validity. The authors found that patients prefer that decisions be made principally by their physicians, not themselves, although they very much want to be informed. There was no correlation between patients' decision making and information-seeking preferences (r = 0.09; p = 0.15). For the majority of patients, their desire to make decisions declined as they faced more severe illness. Older patients had less desire than younger patients to make decisions and to be informed (p less than 0.0001 for each comparison). However, only 19% of the variance among patients for decision making and 12% for information seeking could be accounted for by stepwise regression models using sociodemographic and health status variables as predictors. The conceptual and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Decision-making ability of physical therapists: physical therapy intervention or medical referral.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Opponents of direct access to physical therapy argue that physical therapists may overlook serious medical conditions. More information is needed to determine the ability of physical therapists to practice safely in direct-access environments. The purpose of this study was to describe the ability of physical therapists to make decisions about the management of patients in a direct-access environment. SUBJECTS: Of a random sample of 1,000 members of the Private Practice Section of the American Physical Therapy Association, 394 participated. METHODS: A survey included 12 hypothetical case scenarios. For each case, participants determined whether they would provide intervention without referral, provide intervention and refer, or refer before intervention. The percentage of correct decisions for each group of scenarios was calculated for each participant, and participants were classified as having made correct decisions for 100% of cases or less for each group. Three sets of logistic regressions were completed to determine the characteristics of the participants in relation to the decision category. RESULTS: The average percentages of correct decisions were 87%, 88%, and 79% for musculoskeletal, noncritical medical, and critical medical conditions, respectively. Of all participants, approximately 50% made correct decisions for all cases within each group. The odds of making 100% correct decisions if a physical therapist had an orthopedic specialization were 2.23 (95% confidence interval=1.35-3.71) for musculoskeletal conditions and 1.89 (95% confidence interval=1.14-3.15) for critical medical conditions. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Physical therapists with an orthopedic specialization were almost twice as likely to make correct decisions for critical medical and musculoskeletal conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Economic evaluations of healthcare programmes and decision making: the influence of economic evaluations on different healthcare decision-making levels.

Given the potential role of economic information in healthcare decision making, it is of interest to assess its influence on decisions at a national or regional level (macro level), at a healthcare facility level (meso level) and at the healthcare provider level (micro level). This literature review summarises 36 empirical studies that examined the influence of economic evaluations on these three healthcare decision-making levels. Economic evaluations are considered useful and important; however, their direct influence on decision making (instrumental use) is moderate, especially at the macro and micro levels. A major influence was observed at the meso level, leading to the conclusion that economic evaluations have the most pronounced influence on decision making within healthcare organisations. However, unexpectedly, our literature search did not reveal an empirical study analysing the considerable influence of economic evaluations on decisions by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence in the UK. Our findings indicate that results of economic evaluations cannot be considered the dominant decision criterion for healthcare decision makers at either the macro, meso or micro levels. Enlightenment use (where scientific evidence provides a background of information, ideas and concepts that affect the way policy makers view problems and solutions) of economic evaluations in decision making remains to be proven.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2006

Dynamics of oscillatory activity during auditory decision making.

Perceptual decision making requires the comparison and integration of sensory evidence to generate a behavioral response. We used magnetoencephalography to investigate the temporal dynamics of decision making during an auditory task that required forced-choice decisions about whether a pair of syllables S1 and S2 differed either in their acoustic patterns or in the perceived position of their sound sources. Conditions with easy and difficult decisions were created by varying the similarity of S1 and S2. Statistical probability mapping showed enhanced gamma-band activity (GBA) over posterior parietal cortex for spatial and over left inferior frontal cortex for pattern changes (at approximately 120 to 220 ms after S2 onset). Activations were stronger for easy than difficult decisions. GBA over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was more pronounced at approximately 280 to 430 ms for easy than difficult decisions regardless of type of change, possibly reflecting decision-relevant networks that integrate information from higher sensory areas representing the perceptual alternatives. Sensorimotor beta desynchronization as a measure of motor preparation peaked at approximately 460 ms for easy and at approximately 520 ms for difficult decisions, thus reflecting the reaction time difference between both conditions. In summary, the analysis of oscillatory activity in magnetoencephalogram served to elucidate the temporal dynamics of perceptual decision making in humans.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Making decisions about cancer screening when the guidelines are unclear or conflicting.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the factors involved in the cancer screening decisions of family physicians in situations where the clinical practice guidelines are unclear or conflicting as opposed to when they are clear and uncontroversial. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed discussions with focus groups using a constant comparative approach. POPULATION: A total of 73 family physicians in active practice participated in 10 focus groups (1 urban group and 1 rural group in each of 5 Canadian provinces). OUTCOME MEASURES: Our main outcome measures were participants' perceptions regarding cancer screening when the guidelines were unclear or conflicting. RESULTS: We propose a model of the determinants of cancer screening decision making with regard to unclear and conflicting guidelines. This model is rooted in the physician-patient relationship, and is an interactive process influenced by patient factors (anxiety, expectations, and family history) and physician factors (perception of guidelines, clinical practice experience, influence of colleagues, distinction between the screening styles of specialists and family physicians, and the amount of time and financial costs involved in performing the maneuver). CONCLUSIONS: Our model is unique, because it is embedded in the physician-patient relationship. Ultimately, a modified model could be used to design interventions to assist with the implementation of preventive services guidelines.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Ethics and the decision making process.

Decision making in a clinical setting is influenced by each individual's ethical and moral principles. This paper considers a case study of a man with Parkinson's disease. The morals and principles held by the participants within the decision making process are defined, described and schematically represented according to their role in the process. The author concludes that this case study has changed her attitude to clinical decision making processes.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Clinical judgment and therapeutic decision making.

Clinical decision making is under increased scrutiny due to concerns about the cost and quality of medical care. Variability in physician decision making is common, in part because of deficiencies in the knowledge base, but also due to the difference in physicians' approaches to clinical problem solving. Evaluation of patient prognosis is a critical factor in the selection of therapy, and careful attention to methodology is essential to provide reliable information. Randomized controlled clinical trials provide the most solid basis for the establishment of broad therapeutic principles. Because randomized studies cannot be performed to address every question, observational studies will continue to play a complementary role in the evaluation of therapy. Randomized studies in progress, meta analyses of existing data, and increased use of administrative and collaborative clinical data bases will improve the knowledge base for decision making in the future.

Cardiology↗
PubMed1994

Modifying autonomy--a concept grounded in nurses' experiences of moral decision-making in psychiatric practice.

Fourteen experienced psychiatric nurses participated in a pilot study aimed at describing the experiential aspect of making decisions for the patient. In-depth interviews focused on conflicts, were transcribed, coded, and categorized according to the Grounded Theory method. The theoretical construct, 'modifying autonomy' and its dimensions, such as being aware of the patient's vulnerability, caring for and caring about the patient, were identified. The findings in this study make clear the need for further research into the experiential aspect of ethical decision-making in psychiatric practice.

Beneficence↗
PubMed1999

Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

In this paper we revisit and add elements to our earlier conceptual framework on shared treatment decision-making within the context of different decision-making approaches in the medical encounter (Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T., 1997. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or, it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44, 681 692.). This revised framework (1) explicitly identifies different analytic steps in the treatment decision-making process; (2) provides a dynamic view of treatment decision-making by recognizing that the approach adopted at the outset of a medical encounter may change as the interaction evolves; (3) identifies decision-making approaches which lie between the three predominant models (paternalistic, shared and informed) and (4) has practical applications for clinical practice, research and medical education. Rather than advocating a particular approach, we emphasize the importance of flexibility in the way that physicians structure the decision-making process so that individual differences in patient preferences can be respected.

Canada↗
PubMed1996

Decision making in community nursing: an analysis of the stages of decision making as they relate to community nursing assessment practice.

This paper considers the nature of decisions made in the context of community nursing practice, in the light of the stages of decision making distilled by Carroll & Johnson from the work of various theorists, and explores the relevance of each stage to community nurses' decision making. Illustrative examples of specific theoretical perspectives are included throughout the paper. The discussion forms part of the literature review for research currently being undertaken by the authors into patient assessment by community nurses. As decision making is a key element of community nurses' assessment practice, the paper argues that decision making theory forms a useful conceptual framework for investigating this aspect of community nursing.

Community Health Nursing↗
PubMed1996

Clinical aspects of nurse anesthesia practice: monitoring and decision making.

This article discusses how nurse anesthetists use clinical monitoring to make decisions that guide anesthetic administration. The importance of both didactic and clinical knowledge in making appropriate clinical decisions is examined. A multi-system approach is applied to investigate the various types of clinical monitoring used to observe the patient undergoing general or regional anesthesia.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1995

Cultural context, health and health care decision making. 1994.

Decisions about health promotion and illness prevention occur within a cultural context that is influenced by the contemporary context of community and family in addition to the ethnohistorical and language contexts, worldview and sociocultural factors of the particular culture and the available folk and professional health care resources. Using information about the health and care beliefs and values and health care decision making process in negotiating culturally congruent nursing and health care interventions is imperative, especially in a world with limited health care resources and an increasing demand for recognition of cultural diversity. This article uses data on health and health care decision-making from an ethnonursing study of the Old Order Amish to demonstrate the role of cultural context in health care practices and decision making. Leininger's cultural care theory and Hall's conceptualization of high context culture were used to investigate these phenomena. High context features of the Old Order Amish culture are used to explain how Amish are actively involved in decisions and actions taken to promote health and prevent and treat illness using a broad array of folk, alternative and professional services simultaneously. As nurses learn to involve clients in decisions and actions using the guiding principles of cultural care preservation, accommodation and repatterning they will provide culturally congruent care for Amish and other culture-specific groups.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1995

Clinical decision making--an art or a science? Part II: Making sense of treatment decisions.

Clinical decisions made by dentists can vary considerably. Although there has been a tendency in the media to attribute these differences between practitioners to deliberate unethical practice, as Part I concluded, variations in decision making are a result of the complexity of assessing the risks of different treatment options and evaluating the outcomes of treatment. This article looks at why dentists can make different decisions when faced with identical cases (variation), why sometimes the 'correct' decision is not made (error), and also looks at what other issues affect treatment decision making once disease has been perceived.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1998

Stochastic model of self-regulation decision making exemplified by decisions concerning hypoglycemia.

The following sequence-internal condition --> symptom perception --> appraisal --> decision-models various symptom-based self-regulation processes. A formal mathematical model describes the first three steps by continuous variables and the decisions at the fourth step by binary variables. The stochastic transitions between the sequential steps are quantified by transition probabilities. The model is illustrated by blood glucose level estimation and detection and treatment of hypoglycemia in 78 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. These patients made 50 to 70 data collection trials over 3 to 4 weeks recording perceived symptoms, cognitive-motor performance, subjective estimates of blood glucose, decisions about treatment of hypoglycemia, and driving. A statistical estimation of the model's parameters demonstrates the utility of this approach for understanding the awareness, detection, and treatment of hypoglycemia as a process of symptom-based decision making.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Information seeking and decision making in asthmatic patients].

Patient cooperation in controlling asthma is a key element for achieving the most efficient therapy possible according to current guidelines. Cooperation requires that the patient be adequately informed about his disease and able to make certain decisions. The aim of this study was to analyze whether patients really desire information about asthma and to what point they are disposed to cooperate actively in managing their disease. Ninety-five adult asthmatics with different levels of severity of disease were studied in stable condition. All responded to the Spanish version of the questionnaire on autonomy in asthma, an instrument with a scoring range of 0 to 100 and 26 items grouped in two subscales: preferences in the search for information (PSI) and preferences in decision making (PDM). The second subscale was based on three scenarios describing stable asthma, slight exacerbation and severe exacerbation. The results obtained indicate that although patients are greatly interested in receiving information (PSI scores of 86.4 +/- 8.7) they express substantially less desire to make decisions (PDM 45 +/- 10.2) (p < 0.01). Attitudes did not change in relation to education, number of exacerbations during the last year, duration of disease or severity as assessed by the patient. Only patient age (with older patients scoring higher on PSI) and presence of severe asthma (according to consensus guidelines) increased the desire for information (but not the preference for decision making). These data indicate the need to implement educational programs about asthma, components of which promote effective desire for self-management.

Adult↗