PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Denture Design”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Statistical investigation of lower distal free-end denture design used by general practitioners in Japan.

Tooth loss eventually occurs in most adults, and masticatory function is restored with a prosthesis such as a fixed crown & bridge, removable partial denture (RPD), or complete denture according to the extent of loss. For the RPD there are different structural-element combinations and different designs that can be applied to the same loss pattern, so that the effect and prognosis vary. Results from a statistical investigation of removable distal free-end dentures in Japan suggested that in many cases, insufficient consideration was given to mechanical stability and protection of remaining peripheral tissue in the design of removable partial dentures.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2003

[A systematic approach for removable partial denture design].

Patients' attitudes, medical, surgical and financial considerations lead to the use of a removable partial denture (RPD) as the chosen prosthetic restoration even in the "dental implant era". The aim of this article is to describe a systematic approach to RPD design, so the RPD will be a long-term solution that will not harm the remaining oral tissues. There is an unlimited RPD design options. Choosing the right one involves considering biochemical factors, aesthetics and patients' comfort. A systematic approach starts with a correct diagnosis of the remaining hard and soft tissues, followed by a careful planning of support, stability and retention in that order. Additional elements should be added only at a later stage. A systematic track starting with a preliminary design, surveying of the model and analyzing the preliminary design on that surveyed model. If needed, that track should be reversed until an acceptable design is found. Support should ideally be achieved by using metal rests on healthy tooth structure. Tooth supported RPD are the most convenient ones and have a very good long-term prognosis. Old restorations or caries might impose changes from the ideal supporting rests. When posterior teeth are missing or when the edentulous area is vast, tooth-tissue supported RPD are used. In these cases one should gain initial support from the teeth and an additional support from the soft tissues. A denture base that is similar to a full denture base that would have been prepared for a fully edentulous patient should achieve this. If the prognosis of the potential supporting teeth is poor, a tissue-tooth supported RPD is considered. In these cases, the denture base is the primary supporting element, and stress relieving clasp-assemblies such as the RPI/RPA should be considered. Stability is achieved primarily by metal contacts between teeth and the metal framework of the RPD. In fact, any embracing part of the clasp assembly and a correct denture base can contribute to the stability. The distal parts of the retentive clasps produce the active retention. Since these parts generate lateral forces on the abutment teeth, a reciprocating element should be used. True reciprocation can only be achieved if the reciprocating element touches the tooth before the retentive clasp. After designing support, stability and retention, other parts should be considered. When a distal extension RPD is considered, an indirect retainer should be incorporated into the framework in order to prevent upward rotational movement of the denture. The major connector converts forces from one side to the other. In the upper jaw, that part acts also as a supporting element in Kennedy class I and class II cases. In other cases, a minimal type of a major connector should be chosen. As for minor connectors, these should only be added if other parts--such as guiding planes--couldn't be used for the purpose of connecting functional elements to the major connector. In any case, a 5 mm distance between two adjacent minor connectors should be allowed in order to prevent food from being trapped in that space. A systematic approach starts with diagnosis of the remaining tissues and with finding the correct prosthetic solution with the patient. If a RPD is the chosen solution, start designing with analysis of support, followed by stability and only then, decide upon the necessary retentive elements. All other parts should be considered later. Such a systematic approach will ensure a long-term solution and a happy patient.

Dental Abutments↗
PubMed2001

Comparative study of maxillary complete dentures constructed of metal base and metal structure framework.

A removable denture designed using a three-dimensional cast metal framework (hereafter referred to as the 'structurally designed' denture) could extend denture longevity because it is unbreakable and easy to adjust. The aim of the present clinical study was to compare two types of maxillary removable dentures: conventional dentures and structurally designed denture. One edentulous and five partially dentate patients were fitted with two maxillary dentures made from the same impression and same occlusal relationship. About 20 days after delivery of the denture, masticatory analysis was conducted chewing phase (open, closed, and occluded); coefficients of variation and average variation were calculated. Denture vibration during tapping was then measured using an accelerometer. The patients were also interviewed about comfort, ease of chewing, speech, stability, aesthetics and preference for regular use. For both masticatory movements and denture vibration, there were no significant differences (P>0.1) between the conventional denture and the structural design denture. In evaluating the dentures according to each criteria, the significant superiority of one denture over the other could not be determined. However, all patients subjectively preferred the structurally designed dentures for regular use. According to these findings, structurally designed dentures do not appear to have any particular physiological problems as compared with the conventional dentures.

Acceleration↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Removable partial denture design: a photoelastic study.

Quantifiable frozen-stress photoelastic techniques were used to analyze stresses induced in mandibular models by a conventional free-end saddle removable partial denture. Four quasi-anatomical mandibular models were constructed for processing, together with their respective calibration specimens, through identical time/temperature stress-freezing cycles. After processing and slicing, an unloaded control model demonstrated some low-order fringes adjacent to the coronal third of the abutment tooth roots, but was otherwise stress free. A lower bilateral free-end saddle partial denture was constructed and fitted in turn to each of the remaining three models. Each denture/model combination was then loaded and processed through a stress-freezing cycle. After processing, 6-mm slices were cut from selected regions for analysis for the presence of stresses. Using a polariscope with circular polarized, monochromatic light, values for maximum shear stress were calculated at selected points in the slices taken from the three loaded models. Variations up to 28% of the mean were obtained for the three experimental models as compared with the consistent results for the material fringe values obtained from the calibration specimens. The study pointed out the problems involved in using photoelastic stress analysis on complicated anatomical models. The interpretation of the results from such studies should be approached with caution.

Denture, Partial↗