The disappointed undergraduate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Glycerol triethers were tried as non-absorbable, oil-phase markers for indirectly measuring triglyceride absorption in the human proximal jejunum. Tritium labelled 1-hexadecyl-2, 3-didodecyl glycerol, or 1,2,3-trioleyl glycerol, or 1,2,3-tridecyl glycerol was dissolved in linseed oil and egg yolk lipids; an aqueous emulsion of the lipid mixture was infused into the stomach. Unexpectedly, postprandial jejunal contents contained proportionately less triether than triglyceride compared with the test meals. These triethers were found to separate from an aqueous phase at a faster rate than the triglyceride. This dissociation occurred in the stomach and thwarted quantification of triglyceride absorption by this test system.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
AIM: To compare the performance of leucocyte esterase and nitrite dipstick tests with microscopic examination and culture of first morning urines (n = 420) of hospital inpatients. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the leucocyte esterase test for the cutoff of > 10 WBC/microliter were 57%, 94%, and 68%, respectively. For > 5 WBC per high power field (HPF) these variables were 84%, 90%, and 93%. For > 10(5) colony counts/ml, the sensitivity of the nitrite test was 27%, specificity 94%, and negative predictive value 87%. When either leucocyte esterase or nitrite positivity was accepted as a marker of urinary tract infection, the sensitivity was 78%, specificity 75%, and negative predictive value 94%, and there were 22% false negative results. Semiquantitative microscopic estimation of bacteria per HPF yielded 40% false positives. CONCLUSIONS: Leucocyte esterase and nitrite dipstick tests are not suitable for screening for urinary tract infections.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.