PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ETHICS, PHARMACY”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Ethics and drugs.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2005

[Is the pharmaceutical industry really as bad as its reputation?].

The pharmaceutical industry has a bad image. Recently it has often also been criticised in internationally well-known medical journals. An exact examination in the context of the peculiarities of the pharmaceutical products' market has shown that there are at present five areas where ethical problems in the pharmaceutical industry exist: poor information flow, the relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and public health authorities, security standards and the scientific quality of research, provisioning, and priorities in research. It is difficult for the pharmaceutical industry to cope with conflicts of interest and their implications in these areas. There are surely individual ethical deficiencies and shortcomings but this is no reason for the whole branch to be castigated. In comparison to other branches, the pharmaceutical industry is much better than its image. People have to consume pharmaceutical products even though they do not like doing so, and therefore cannot be expected to champion the cause of the branch. It needs to adopt another strategy in order to improve its image.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

What patients think about promotional activities of pharmaceutical companies in Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: Drugs, as commercial products, are subject to diverse marketing methods including promotional activities. Although the legal/ethical aspects of promotional activities have been discussed in a limited manner, the patient has remained the neglected variable of this equation. The goal of our study, therefore, is to investigate the patients' opinion on the promotional activities of pharmaceutical companies. METHOD: A descriptive study was conducted at 44 primary health care centers in Turkey and 584 volunteers who applied to these centers were included. A questionnaire consisting of 42 questions was developed with demographic information in the first section, and drug ads and promotions included in the second section. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The awareness and ethical evaluation of patients of the promotional activities. RESULTS: Nearly 83% of the participants were aware of the promotion issue. Eighty percent found it unethical, 82% suggested that promotional activities should be forbidden, restricted or regulated. 1/3 of the participants believed that physicians made their drug choices based on the gifts and ads of pharmaceutical companies. Half of them had low confidence in the prescriptions of physicians who accepted gifts from the pharmaceutical companies. 54.5% of patients also considered promotional activities as a factor which increased drug prices. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, a considerable number of patients were aware of promotions and the effects of promotion on prescriptions. The findings of our study may contribute to the development of effective regulations on this issue. Very strict measures controlling drug companies' promotion activities must be formulated. Further, these regulations must incorporate and take into consideration the patients' opinion. Today, the basic need for the proper use of drugs does not rest in pharmaceutical promotion, but in providing adequate health services and effective education for both people and physicians.

Adult↗
PubMed1968

Setting new goals.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Ethics, Pharmacy↗