SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nephrectomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Circadian blood pressure rhythm is disturbed by nephrectomy.

We recently illustrated a close relationship between glomerular filtration rate and circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, it remains undetermined from such cross-sectional findings which occurs first, the loss of kidney function or the lack of nocturnal BP fall. In the present study, we examined whether circadian rhythm of BP is affected by unilateral nephrectomy for kidney donation to clarify this important issue. Fifteen healthy subjects (4 men, 11 women; aged 33 to 65 years; mean age 55 +/- 2 years) who underwent unilateral nephrectomy for kidney donation were studied. Ambulatory BP was monitored for 24 h, while serum and urinary samples were collected to estimate creatinine clearance before and on the 8th day after nephrectomy. Then, changes in the night/day ratios of mean arterial BP were analyzed in relation to the decrease in 24-h creatinine clearance as a marker of glomerular filtration rate by nephrectomy. Creatinine clearance was reduced by 29% in average from 84 +/- 6 to 60 +/- 4 ml/min by nephrectomy, while 24-h mean arterial BP values were 91 +/- 3 and 94 +/- 4 mmHg (p=0.08) before and after nephrectomy. Although mean BP (daytime, nighttime or night/day ratio) was not altered significantly by nephrectomy, the decrease in creatinine clearance was positively correlated with the increase in the night/ day ratio of mean BP (r=0.61, p=0.017). The decrease in creatinine clearance was not correlated with changes in either 24-h, daytime or nighttime mean BP. Our results suggest that unilateral nephrectomy disturbs the circadian rhythm of BP as a function of renal dysfunction without affecting absolute levels of BP. Non-dipping of BP seems the consequence of the loss of renal function, rather than the cause.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Differential regulation of brain angiotensin II in genetically hypertensive and normotensive rats after nephrectomy.

To investigate the role of tissue angiotensin II (Ang II) in the maintenance of hypertension after nephrectomy in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), Ang II levels were measured in various tissues of both 12-week-old SHR and normotensive control, Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY), 48 h after nephrectomy or sham operation. Ang II was determined by radioimmunoassay coupled with high performance liquid chromatography. Nephrectomy caused a decrease of plasma renin activity and plasma Ang II concentration in both SHR and WKY. Aortic Ang II levels were significantly lowered by nephrectomy only in WKY, and not in SHR. Ang II levels in hypothalamic block, brainstem and cerebellum of SHR increased after nephrectomy, whereas those of WKY were unchanged. Intracerebroventricular administration of ceronapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, significantly decreased sustained high blood pressure in SHR 48 h after nephrectomy compared with vehicle administration, whereas intravenous administration had no effect. These results suggest that in spite of the important role of the renal renin-angiotensin system in maintenance of high blood pressure in SHR, control mechanisms may switch to other systems after nephrectomy, and that the increased brain Ang II levels after nephrectomy may be related to these mechanisms.

Angiotensin II↗

PubMed2000

Compensatory renal hypertrophy and changes of renal function following nephrectomy.

We studied the changes in the serum creatinine level and the volume of the remaining kidney following nephrectomy using contrast-enhanced compounded tomogram (CT) scans. Twenty-five patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma without obvious disease in the remaining kidney were carefully followed for a period of at least two years at our hospital. Twelve patients received follow-up CT scans each year after nephrectomy. The ellipsoid volume of the kidney was calculated by measuring the 3-dimensional size on CT scans. The mean relative volume (%) of the remaining kidney increased up to year 3 postoperatively, and the final mean relative volume at varying periods from years 2 to 7 was 120%. Kidneys that were smaller prior to nephrectomy showed a tendency to have a larger final relative volume after nephrectomy, although there was no significant correlation between the kidney volume prior to nephrectomy and at final measurement. The mean serum creatinine level was significantly increased at one year after nephrectomy, but it decreased significantly over time. Therefore, both compensatory renal hypertrophy and improved renal function seemed to be established within several years after nephrectomy. However, the improvement of serum creatinine was delayed compared with the increase of kidney volume. That is, renal plasma flow might be increased early by compensatory renal hypertrophy, followed within a few years by an increase in glomerular filtration and a decrease of serum creatinine.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Blood loss and the need for transfusion in patients who undergo partial or radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We assessed blood loss and subsequent transfusion associated with nephrectomy performed for suspected renal cell carcinoma to establish guidelines for preoperative autologous blood donation and identify a subgroup of patients that may benefit from erythropoietin administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 211 patients who underwent partial (73%) or radical (23%) nephrectomy for presumed renal cell carcinoma at our institution between 1990 and 1999. Patients were divided into groups 1-44.5% treated with radical nephrectomy for localized disease, 2-21.3% radical nephrectomy for metastatic lesions invading the renal vasculature or inferior vena cava, 3-8% radical nephrectomy for metastatic disease with locally extensive lesions and 4-26.5% partial nephrectomy for localized lesions. Patient charts were evaluated for preoperative and postoperative hematocrit, estimated blood loss, transfusions received, surgical complications and underlying disease. RESULTS: Median estimated blood loss was 200, 400, 250 and 555 cc in groups 1 to 4, respectively. However, patients in groups 2 and 3 had a substantially greater range of blood loss than those in groups 1 and 4, respectively. The incidence of those with a blood loss of greater than 1 l. was 7%, 36%, 24% and 11% in groups 1, to 4, respectively. The incidence of those requiring transfusion was significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 to 4 (18% versus 44%, 24% and 30%, respectively, p <0.009). Mean transfusion requirement plus or minus standard deviation was significantly greater in groups 2 and 3 than in 1 and 4 (2.3 +/- 1.08, 5.5 +/- 4.4, 11.3 +/- 9.6 and 2.3 +/- 1.7 units, respectively, p <0.05). No significant difference was noted in the change in hematocrit as a result of surgery in the 4 groups (p >0.05). Similarly underlying disease and operative complications did not have a significant effect on blood loss or transfusion (p >0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: Radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma leads to consistent and well tolerated operative blood loss that rarely results in the need for substantial transfusion. In contrast, nephrectomy for advanced disease may cause a risk of greater blood loss and subsequent need for the transfusion of multiple units of blood. While preoperative autologous blood donation may have limited value in this regard due to the high cost and number of units needed, preoperative erythropoietin administration may be a viable option. Prospective randomized studies are currently planned.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Financial analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy are rapidly becoming established procedures in select patients with renal cell carcinoma and upper tract transitional cell carcinoma, respectively. We present a retrospective comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy from a financial standpoint. The effect of the learning curve on costs incurred was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed itemized cost data on 18 contemporary cases of open radical nephrectomy performed from September 1997 to July 1998 were compared with similar data on 20 initial laparoscopic cases performed from September 1997 to July 1998 and 15 more recent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy cases performed from August 1998 to July 1999. Financial data were also compared on 14 contemporary patients each who underwent open radical nephroureterectomy from June 1997 to December 1999, initial laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy from June 1997 to December 1998 and more recent laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy from January 1999 to October 2000. Yearly financial costs were adjusted for inflation by a 4% annual rate to reflect year 2000 data. RESULTS: For radical nephrectomy mean operative time in the 18 open, 20 initial laparoscopic and 15 recent laparoscopic cases was 185.3, 205.7 and 147.3 minutes, respectively. Mean specimen weight was 555, 616 and 558 gm., and mean hospital stay was 132, 31 and 23 hours, respectively. Compared with open radical nephrectomy mean total costs associated with initial laparoscopy were 33% greater (p = 0.0003). Mean intraoperative costs were 102% greater and mean postoperative costs were 50% less. In contrast, the more recent laparoscopic cases were an overall mean of 12% less expensive than open surgery (p = 0.05). Mean intraoperative costs were only 33% greater and mean postoperative costs were 68% less. For radical nephroureterectomy mean operative time in the 14 open, 14 initial laparoscopic and 14 recent laparoscopic cases was 246, 196 and 195 minutes, respectively. Mean specimen weight was 442, 517 and 531 gm., and mean hospital stay was 142, 63 and 32 hours, respectively. Compared with open radical nephroureterectomy mean total costs associated with initial laparoscopic cases were 28% greater (p = 0.03). Mean intraoperative costs were 65% greater and mean postoperative costs were 27% less. In contrast, the more recent laparoscopic cases were an overall mean of 6% less expensive than open surgery (p = 0.63). Mean intraoperative costs were only 31% greater and mean postoperative costs were 62% less. CONCLUSIONS: Initially in the learning curve laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy were 33% and 28% financially more expensive, respectively, than their open counterparts. However, with increased operator experience and efficiency resulting in more rapid operative time and decreased hospitalization laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy are currently 12% and 6% less expensive, respectively, than their open counterparts at our institution.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Single-center analysis of living donor nephrectomy: hand-assisted laparoscopic, pure laparoscopic, and traditional open.

CONTEXT: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has been shown to be a safe method for removing kidneys for transplantation, but concerns have been raised regarding safety and long-term kidney function. OBJECTIVE: To compare safety and long-term kidney function in hand-assisted laparoscopic, pure laparoscopic, and traditional open living donor nephrectomy. METHOD: The charts of 48 patients with more than 1 year follow-up were reviewed. Thirty-four consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and 14 had open donor nephrectomy. All kidneys functioned immediately at transplantation. In the laparoscopic group, 11 had the pure laparoscopic technique, and 23 patients had hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. RESULTS: Total operative and warm ischemic times were reduced with the hand-assisted technique when compared with pure laparoscopy. Operative and warm ischemic times were similar in open nephrectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopy. Long-term follow-up of serum creatinine levels revealed no significant differences between the 3 groups. Complication rates in the 3 groups were similar. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be comparable to open donor nephrectomy in terms of safety and long-term graft function.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Hand-assisted surgery improves outcomes for laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Laparoscopy has become the preferred method for nephrectomy in many medical centers. We compared our experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) and standard laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN). Data were prospectively collected on 119 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy between August 2000 and November 2002. Outcomes were compared for LN versus HALN using Wilcoxon rank sum test for quantitative outcomes and Fisher exact test and chi2 for qualitative outcomes. Thirty-nine patients underwent LN: 16 live donor, 16 radical, and 7 simple nephrectomies. Eighty patients were treated with HALN: 47 live donor, 32 radical, and 1 simple nephrectomy. There were no differences in mean age (49.2 years LN vs. 47.7 years HALN, P = 0.60) or weight (192.2 lb LN, 179.2 lb HALN, P = 0.12). Mean tumor size (4.77 cm LN vs. 7.12 cm HALN, P = 0.07) and length of extraction incision (8.37 cm LN vs. 7.87 cm HALN, P = 0.08) were similar. Total hospital charges (19,352 dollars vs. 18,505 dollars, P = 0.29) and length of stay (3.68 days vs. 3.72 days, P = 0.15) were equivalent for LN and HALN. Average operative time for HALN was significantly shorter (202 minutes vs. 258 minutes, P = 0.0001), and blood loss was less for HALN (71.7 cc vs. 113.1 cc, P = 0.007). Wound complications rates were similar (6.5% HALN vs. 13% LN, P = 0.34), but overall morbidity rates were higher after LN (28.2% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.001). Compared with pure laparoscopic nephrectomy, the hand-assisted approach reduces operative time and blood loss without increasing total hospital charges or length of stay. In our patients, HALN was also associated with fewer postoperative complications than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Hand-assisted laparoscopy may allow for the performance of increasingly complex procedures while maintaining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

PubMed2005

[Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: our experience in short-term hospital stay].

OBJECTIVE: To prove that the nephrectomy, in spite of being a major surgery, requires less than 48 hours stay hospital if it is performed by retro peritoneal approach. Consequently this procedure can be carry out in a short hospital stay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1995, we have treat 40 patients by retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, 46 nephrectomies in total, being bilateral in 6 patients because of terminal renal failure (TRF), who do not take part in that study. The average age was 4.8 years range old (with a rank between 6 months and 13 years old), in relation with sex, male (n=16) and female (n=18). As for the side of the nephrectomy, it was the right in 20 cases and left in 14. Those pathologies, which indicated the nephrectomy because of kidney's functional annulations, were: obstructive hydronephrosis (n=2); obstructive megaureter (n=1); kidney destroyed by reflux (n=8); multicystic displasia (n=11); involution multicystic diyplasia (n=12). RESULTS: In all the cases, the nephrectomy was pure retroperitoneal approach. The average time of surgical duration was of 92 minutes (with a range between 60-240 minutes). It was reconversion in 1 case (4.5%) by peritoneal micro perforation (n=1). We underline absence of inherent complications to retroperitoneoscopy, intraoperative and postoperative procedures. As secondary complications to the access surgical procedure were 2 wall relaxations because of incisional injury and one serum collection of the first port site. The bleeding during the operative act was imperceptible, less than 20 cc. Drainages were not left in the operative bed. The average stay has been reduced to 27 hours, without being counted the 6 cases of TRF. In the last 18 cases the hospitality discharge was made in the first 24 h postoperative. The analgesic established by protocol was analgesic of infiltration of ports site with 1% bupivacaine and one dose of paracetamol/ibuprofen, given 12h after the intervention and repeated after hospitality discharge. Essumpcion of their day home-life and school- was earlier in 100% of cases. We underline the absence of secondary complications to pain (breathing) neither to immobilization. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneoscopic nephectomy is a clearly established indication and of required fulfilment in paediatric age. It is the suitable surgical boarding to perform a nephrectomy because of its reliability, reproductibile and safety. Media hospital stayis lesser when the nephrectomy was performed by retro peritoneal approach than conventional surgery. Consequently this procedure can be carry out in a short hospital stay.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

The change of the split renal function before and after a nephrectomy using Tc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3).

OBJECTIVE: We examined the change in the renal function in the normal side kidney before and after a nephrectomy, by means of a newly developed diuretic renography technique utilizing Tc 99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients who underwent a nephrectomy were evaluated using MAG3 diuretic renography. We measured the effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and Tmax time before and after a nephrectomy. The effects of the patient age and the preoperative ERPF of ill side kidney on the post operative ERPF were then assessed statistically. RESULTS: The ERPF increased by an average of 44.8 ml/min at 2 weeks after a nephrectomy, but it decreased by an average of 24.3 ml/min at 3 months after a nephrectomy. The Tmax time decreased by an average of 0.58 min at 2 weeks, but thereafter increased by an average of 0.58 min at 3 months after a nephrectomy. The correlation coefficient between the rate of increase in the ERPF and the patient age was 0.197. CONCLUSIONS: The rise of renal function in terms of ERPF and the Tmax time was observed at 2 weeks post-nephrectomy. However, this effect disappeared at 3 months post-nephrectomy. These data demonstrated that the rise in the renal function of the normal-side kidney in such patients was only temporary.

Adult↗

PubMed1980

Indications for and results of nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

We find that, when metastases are present, a nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma is not justified in the vast majority of cases. The only noncontroversial indication is for palliative nephrectomy which is performed to relieve intractable symptoms in the properly chosen patient. However, it is unusual to see a patient with tumor-related symptoms that cannot be conservatively managed. A relative indication for nephrectomy is found in the patient with osseous metastases only, as some studies have demonstrated a prolongation of survival by adjunctive nephrectomy in this setting. Another relative indication is in the patient with limited metastases that are amenable to surgical or radiation ablation coupled with nephrectomy; patients in whom the metastasis appears years after the nephrectomy have the best chance for a successful outcome. When therapy that is effective against metastatic tumor is eventually found, adjunctive nephrectomy as a debulking procedure may become indicated; until then, surgery is not justified. On the basis of data presently available, adjunctive nephrectomy in the hope of inducing spontaneous regression of metastases is never indicated.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1983

Hypercalcemia after nephrectomy in the dog: role of the kidneys and parathyroid glands.

UNLABELLED: To examine the role of the kidneys and parathyroid glands in the development of hypercalcemia after bilateral nephrectomy, changes in serum calcium and iPTH were measured in dogs after bilateral nephrectomy, bilateral ureteral ligation, bilateral nephrectomy of thyroparathyroidectomized animals, or sham operation. Total calcium increased at 24 hr after nephrectomy, remained unchanged after bilateral ureteral ligation or sham surgery, and decreased after nephrectomy of thyroparathyroidectomized dogs. Ionized calcium decreased significantly at 12 hr after nephrectomy or ureteral ligation but returned to normal after 24 to 48 hr. At 72 hr ionized calcium remained normal in the nephrectomized animals but fell significantly in the ureteral ligation animals. At 12 and 24 hr, PTH was significantly higher (4.3- and 2.0-fold, respectively) in the nephrectomized group than in the ureteral ligation group. CONCLUSIONS: (1) the increase in total serum calcium after bilateral nephrectomy in the dog is not accompanied by an increase in ionized calcium; (2) intact parathyroid function is necessary for the increase in total calcium and for the maintenance of ionized calcium after nephrectomy; (3) the presence of the kidneys in the ureteral ligation model prevents the rise in total serum calcium and allows a fall in ionized calcium.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

PubMed1998

En bloc nephrectomy in patients undergoing post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous testis cancer: indications, implications and outcomes.

PURPOSE: We review the indications for nephrectomy at post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, identify patients at risk for nephrectomy and assess the impact of nephrectomy on outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a computerized data base and chart review we retrospectively reviewed the records of 848 patients who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy. RESULTS: En bloc nephrectomy was performed at retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy in 162 of the 848 patients (19%). The indications for nephrectomy included contiguous involvement of perirenal structures in 73% of the cases, renal vein thrombosis in 6%, a poorly functioning or nonfunctioning renal unit in 5% and a combination of these conditions in 16%. Pathological studies of the hilum revealed cancer in 20% of the cases, teratoma in 49% and fibrosis in 31%. Patients requiring nephrectomy had significantly more advanced disease and larger disease volume at presentation and after chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in perioperative morbidity or mortality compared with patients who did not undergo nephrectomy. Only 3 patients required perioperative dialysis and none required long-term renal support. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support en bloc nephrectomy at post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in select patients with large volume perihilar retroperitoneal disease.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic wedge resection and partial nephrectomy--the Washington University experience and review of the literature.

Open partial nephrectomy is an accepted form of treatment for a variety of benign conditions and for localized renal cell carcinoma. To date, there is limited experience with the clinical application of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and wedge resection for benign and malignant disease of the kidney. Herein, we report our clinical experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and a review of the current literature. Twelve patients (27-81 years) have undergone laparoscopic wedge resection (3) or attempted polar partial nephrectomy (9) since 1993. In the group of 12 patients, 5 had a mass suspicious for a malignancy, 4 patients had symptomatic polar calyceal dilation with or without stone disease, and 3 patients had an atrophic or hydronephrotic upper pole moiety. Among the patients in the polar nephrectomy group, a third were converted to an open procedure. The remaining 6 patients had a mean operative time of 6.5 hours (5.7-8.3 hours). These patients resumed their oral intake on average 0.8 days postoperatively. In the 2 patients with a mass, the final pathology was oncocytoma (1), and xanthogranulomatous reaction in a renal cyst (1). Postoperative complications included a nephrocutaneous fistula which was endoscopically fulgurated, a retroperitoneal urinoma which was percutaneously drained, and a two-day bout of ileus. The mean hospital stay was 5.3 days (2-9). Their full convalescence was completed in a mean of 4.2 weeks (2-8). Three patients underwent a wedge resection for a superficial < 2 cm mass. The average operative time in this group was 3.5 hours (2-5.4). The mean time to resuming oral intake was 0.7 days (0.3-0.7). The final pathology was oncocytoma (1), oncocytic renal cell cancer (1), and old infarction (1); none of the patients had any complications. The mean hospital stay was 2.7 days (2-4). Convalescence was completed in 4 weeks (range 1-8). Laparoscopic wedge resection and polar partial nephrectomy are feasible, albeit currently tedious techniques. While wedge excision of a < 2 cm superficial lesion is relatively straightforward and efficient, laparoscopic polar partial nephrectomy remains a difficult technique and at present remains in evolution. Further development of instrumentation to provide for a reliable, expeditious, and hemostatic partial nephrectomy is needed.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Does nephrectomy for trauma increase the risk of renal failure?

Renal failure is a feared complication following operations for severe trauma. Injuries to the kidney may be managed by nephrectomy or nephrorrhaphy. Nephrectomy may increase the risk of renal failure in already at-risk trauma patients. Nephrectomy for trauma should be avoided to the extent possible because it is associated with renal failure. From a prospectively collected trauma database, 59 patients with nephrectomy were matched at 1:1 ratio with 59 patients with nephrorrhaphy. Matching criteria were age (+/- 5 years), Injury Severity Score (+/- 3), abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score (+/- 1), and mechanism of injury (blunt or penetrating). The rates of renal function compromise (defined as a serum creatinine level >2 mg/dl for more than 2 days) and renal replacement therapy (continuous or intermittent) were compared in the two groups. The two groups were well-matched and similar with regard to injury severity and organs injured. Between nephrectomy and nephrorrhaphy patients, there were no differences in renal function compromise (10% vs. 14%, p = 0.57), renal replacement therapy (5% vs. 0%, p = 0.12), length of hospital stay (19 +/- 26 vs. 20 +/- 21, p = 0.8), and mortality (15% vs. 12%, p = 0.59). Salvaging the injured kidney does not seem to offer an obvious clinical benefit regarding postoperative renal function. Given the increased operative complexity of nephrorrhaphy in comparison to nephrectomy and the frequent need to abbreviate the operation in patients with severe trauma, nephrectomy should not be avoided when appropriate.

Abbreviated Injury Scale↗

PubMed2002

Small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has become the procedure of choice for kidney procurement at many centers worldwide. A decrease in postoperative pain and length of stay, a faster return to work, and no difference in morbidity and mortality compared to open nephrectomy have all been reported. However, few data exist regarding the complication of postoperative internal hernia and small bowel obstruction, which is unique to a laparoscopic/transperitoneal approach. METHODS: We present three case reports of patients who developed small bowel obstruction from an internal hernia and mesenteric defect after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. RESULTS: A total of 635 patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy between March 1996 and August 2001 at our institution. Small bowel obstruction developed in three patients (0.47%) within 1 week postoperatively. Each case involved an internal hernia through a left colon mesenteric defect at the site of nephrectomy. Reoperation was necessary in each case and was associated with a prolonged hospital stay (mean, 22.3 days; range, 6-37). Two patients were managed with laparotomy; one patient underwent a laparoscopically assisted exploration. One patient required an additional open exploration for intraabdominal sepsis and cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel obstruction from internal hernia following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a rare event, but it can lead to significant morbidity in an otherwise healthy patient. These patients may be at higher risk for bowel obstruction given the soft tissue defect remaining after nephrectomy. Vigilance is required when mobilizing the colon to ensure that mesenteric defects are recognized and repaired.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Persistent post-transplant polyuria managed by bilateral native-kidney laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Polyuria is not considered an absolute indication for pre-transplant nephrectomy; however, it may complicate post-transplantation fluid management. Bilateral native-kidney laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed at our centre in two patients (four kidneys) 1 month after they had received a living related-donor renal transplant. The indication for nephrectomy was severe post-transplant polyuria secondary to the patient's underlying disease: juvenile nephronophthisis. Both patients had a persistent post-transplant daily urine output of 7-8 l/day and continued to have a variable serum creatinine level, dependent on intravenous hydration, more then 3 weeks after transplantation. Bilateral laparoscopic native-kidney nephrectomy in children has previously been reported. However, to the best of our knowledge, laparoscopic nephrectomy has not been described after kidney transplantation and certainly not in the immediate post-transplantation period. The procedure was well tolerated and did not affect renal graft function. In fact, following the procedure, serum creatinine levels stabilized, while daily fluid requirements decreased to 2.5-3.5 l/day in both patients. We concluded that bilateral native-kidney nephrectomy can be safely performed in paediatric renal transplant recipients in the immediate post-transplantation period. This new approach may allow preemptive transplantation and avoid the need for a transition period on dialysis in patients for whom pre-transplant nephrectomy is not absolutely indicated.

Child↗

PubMed2005

Interferon alpha 2b as medical selection for nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a consecutive study.

OBJECTIVE: Up to 25% of the patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nephrectomy and interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha) will progress rapidly at metastatic sites and undergo needless surgery for an asymptomatic primary. We reversed the timing of surgery and immunotherapy and evaluated the role of initial IFN-alpha as selection for nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with mRCC and the primary in-situ received initial IFN-alpha for 8 weeks (2 weeks 5x3x10(6)IU/wk; 2 weeks 5x6x10(6)IU/wk; 2 weeks 5x9x10(6)IU/wk and 2 weeks 3x9x10(6)IU/wk). Patients with either partial remission (PR) or stable disease (SD) underwent nephrectomy followed by IFN-alpha maintenance at 3x9x10(6)IU/wk. Patients were evaluated with regard to age, sex, metastatic sites, morbidity, response, nephrectomy rate, time to progression and survival. RESULTS: Thirteen patients received 2 months of preoperative IFN-alpha; 3 stopped during the 2 months period due to progressive disease (PD). Eight patients developed either a PR (n=3) or SD (n=5) at metastatic sites and underwent nephrectomy. Survival at 1 year is 50% (4/8 patients). Median progression-free survival was 6 months (3-17 months). Two of the 3 patients with PR developed a CR after 2 months maintenance following surgery. Eight patients with PD did not undergo surgery and had a median survival of 4 months (range 1-8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Absence of progression at metastatic sites following IFN-alpha with the primary tumor in place may be used as selection for nephrectomy in patients with an intermediate prognosis. Currently, a randomized study is underway to assess the role of initial versus delayed nephrectomy in combination with IFN-alpha with regard to morbidity and survival.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

The use of polymer (Hem-o-lok) clips for management of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Control of the renal pedicle is the most challenging step during laparoscopic nephrectomy. The standard method is to clip the artery and control the vein with an endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler. However, this device is expensive and has been reported to malfunction, leading to major complications even death. We describe an easy, quick, and cost-effective alternative technique. METHODS: From June 2002 to July 2005, two surgeons used this simplified technique to control the renal vein during laparoscopic nephrectomy. After pedicle dissection and control of the artery with a clip, the vein was grasped and gently pulled with a laparoscopic Babcock to reduce its diameter. Two Hem-o-lok clips (Weck Closure Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC) were easily placed on the renal vein, which was then transacted safely. RESULTS: We used this technique successfully for 130 consecutive laparoscopic nephrectomies (10 simple, 47 radical, 7 nephroureterectomies, and 66 live donor nephrectomies). No perioperative complications occurred with this technique in this series. There was no increase in the warm ischemia time when used during laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The Hem-o-lok technique is easy, safe, and rapid and offers cost savings when compared to the endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler. We recommend its use during laparoscopic nephrectomy and live donor nephrectomy.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗