PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Prophylactic Surgical Procedures”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Technical difficulties and perioperative complications of retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia.

In 139 patients, 260 consecutive retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomies for trigeminal neuralgia were retrospectively analyzed regarding technical surgical difficulties and immediate and early complications. Technical obstacles occurred in 47.3%. In 21 cases (8.1%), the surgical procedure had to be interrupted due to circumstances such as vasovagal reactions, cardiac arrest, or difficulties to find the trigeminal cistern. Complications or side effects, being either transient or persistent, occurred in 67.3%. In the vast majority, those unwanted effects were related to mild sensory deficits. However, in 28.1% the complications were other than mild affection of facial sensibility. These slightly graver complications included labial herpes (3.8%), anesthesia dolorosa (0.8%), moderate or severe affection of sensibility (18.8%), dysesthesia (22.7%), chemical meningitis (1.5%) and infectious meningitis (1.5%). In 5 patients (1.9%) hearing was affected. In one of them, this condition was also brought about by tinnitus, and in another patient a preexisting tinnitus deteriorated. Although the frequency of surgical difficulties was high, the success of the glycerol injection was hampered only in a minor number of procedures. The frequency of complications and side effects was high, but they were mostly mild due to their nature and non-disabling for the patient. However, long-lasting disabling side effects occurred, and this should not be neglected when informing patients preoperatively. The surgical training needed to perform the procedure is stressed, and the use of prophylactic antibiotics when accidentally penetrating the oral bucca is recommended. We consider retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy to be a good surgical option for patients with trigeminal neuralgia not suitable for microvascular decompression and when pharmacological therapy is not sufficient or is not tolerated.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗
PubMed1989

National study on the utilization of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery, Belgium, 1986.

During the last week of May 1986, a 1-week prospective study on antibiotic utilization in surgical patients was held in 104 (42%) of the 247 Belgian acute care hospitals. All surgical patients with a post-operative stay of at least 3 days were studied, involving 3112 patients. Each patient was observed for 7 days, starting from the day before surgery. Antibiotics were administered to 71.9% of all patients; 21.9% received therapeutic antibiotics and 52.9% prophylactic antibiotics; 2.9% received both. Of the 1285 patients undergoing a surgical procedure with no indication for antimicrobial prophylaxis, 50.7% nevertheless received prophylaxis; 92.8% of patients with a generally recognized indication for prophylaxis received antibiotic prophylaxis. Less than one fifth (17.1%) of all prophylactic courses were stopped on the day of the intervention whilst 26.3% were continued up to the fifth post-operative day or beyond. The most frequently prescribed drugs for this indication included first and second generation cephalosporins and nitroimidazoles. The number of different generic drugs utilized per hospital ranged from 1 to 18 (mean: 7.7).

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Prospective study of Clostridium difficile intestinal colonization and disease following single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery.

A total of 108 volunteers undergoing an elective surgical procedure were randomly given a single 2-g intravenous prophylactic dose of either a cephalosporin or mezlocillin. Stool samples were cultured for Clostridium difficile the day before the operation and later on postoperative days 4, 7, and 14. C. difficile was detected in 23.0% of patients who received a cephalosporin (cefoxitin, 8.3%; cefazolin, 14.3%; cefotetan, 20.0%; ceftriaxone, 25.0%; cefoperazone, 43.7%), in 3.3% of patients given mezlocillin, and in none of 15 control volunteers given no antimicrobial agent. No patient experienced diarrhea.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1978

[Experience in prophylactic peroperative cardiac electrostimulation (author's transl)].

The Authors refer on about 35 cases of prophylactic peroperative cardiac electrostimulation on about 50,500 cases undergoing surgical procedures during seven years. The indications were: bifascicular block, complete left bundle branch block, primitive sinusal bradycardia, surgical correction of carotid synus syndrome, atrial fibrillation with spontaneous low ventricular rate, neurosurgical treatment of cranial trauma by suspected MAS syndrome, surgical implantation of epicardial electrodes. It is enphasized the necessity to continue with prophylactic peroperative cardiac stimulation in all these cases, except for bifascicular blocks for which one has to decide case by case according to the clinical history and ECG findings.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Fluoroquinolones and surgical prophylaxis.

The objective of surgical prophylaxis is to prevent wound infections associated with surgery. The rates of wound infections vary according to the procedure: less than 3 infections per 100 for clean procedures; up to 4 per 100 for clean-contaminated procedures; and up to 9 per 100 for contaminated procedures. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis has been shown in many randomised clinical trials to reduce the incidence of postoperative wound infections. Such prophylaxis is actually recommended in many clean-contaminated and some clean procedures. Because of their antimicrobial, pharmacokinetic, and antiadhesive properties, the fluoroquinolones have been recently proposed as prophylactic agents. Fluoroquinolones have proved to be useful in surgical prophylaxis and clinical trials have been performed in orthopaedic, cardiovascular, biliary, colorectal and urological surgery. According to the surgical procedure, fluoroquinolones were compared either with the standard antimicrobial regimen or with placebo. Different regimens of fluoroquinolones were also compared. Generally, fluoroquinolones have been demonstrated to be as effective as the reference prophylactic agent. In transurethral surgery, fewer postoperative wound infections were reported in the treated group than in the placebo group. In most studies, single dose prophylaxis was as effective as a multiple dose regimen. It is important to note that strict methodology was limited to a few clinical trials. In most of the studies, patients were not randomised in a double-blind fashion and small patient numbers often prevented the formation of satisfactory conclusions. Further trials are needed to define the role of the fluoroquinolones in surgical prophylaxis. It will be important to evaluate not only the efficacy but also the cost-benefit of perioperative prophylaxis with the fluoroquinolones. Clinical trials are also required in other high risk clean procedures such as neurosurgery involving shunts and ocular surgery. However, the risks related to the extensive use of fluoroquinolones in surgical prophylaxis must be considered, including the development and dissemination of resistant pathogens and the occurrence of adverse effects. In the future, surgical prophylaxis with prosthetic devices coated with fluoroquinolones should be considered.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed1991

Incompetent cervix: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.

The incompetent cervix is a diagnostic dilemma. There are no well-defined or strict criteria to diagnose cervical incompetence, and therefore the indications for treatment are not always clear. Forty years ago, when the basic methods of treatment were first described, the diagnosis seemed relatively simple and the treatment acceptable. There have been very few large, prospective, randomized, well-controlled studies to determine the efficacy of the various surgical methods. Liberal use of cerclage procedures in situations of moderate risk for premature delivery or as prophylactic measures in multiple pregnancy does not appear to improve outcome as judged by prematurity or fetal survival. At the present, fetal survival cannot be a measure of the success of a surgical procedure because so many other factors play a role in outcome, such as the quality of obstetrical and neonatal care. Therefore, outcome of surgical procedures should be judged by more objective criteria, such as prolongation of pregnancy (in weeks) and birth weight. The methods that would allow making an unequivocal and objective diagnosis of incompetent cervix are not yet available. Until we reach this goal, the subject of cervical incompetence and effectiveness of its treatment will remain challenging and elusive.

Female↗
PubMed2002

Clinical implications of thromboprophylaxis in the management of total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Thrombosis is the most common cause of mortality in the United States, resulting in more than 2 million deaths per year. Almost an equal number of individuals are affected each year by nonfatal thrombosis, including deep vein thrombosis and nonfatal pulmonary embolism. A large proportion of thrombotic episodes can be prevented by the appropriate selection of prophylactic therapy--a clinical decision that figures greatly in numerous clinical conditions associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, including major orthopedic surgery. Orthopedic surgeons are well aware of the risks for complications inherent in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in particular. However, determining which protocols are optimal for thromboprophylaxis remains a matter of contention, and the choice of prophylactic therapy is a critical factor in the successful completion of any major orthopedic surgical procedure. Although there are key differences between total hip and knee arthroplasty in terms of the measures available for thromboprophylaxis and the data documenting their relative degree of effectiveness, the two procedures share many similarities in these respects as well as in their surgical protocols. By reviewing the data and practice guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in total hip and knee arthroplasty together, orthopedic surgeons can more clearly see the implications for clinical success that the choice of prophylactic therapy has on their management of these two vitally important procedures.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1975

Infections after retinal detachment surgery.

The signs and symptoms of infection after retinal detachment surgery may be subtle and frequently are overlooked during early stages. A retrospective analysis of 3,334 consecutive procedures for retinal detachment revealed 37 cases (1.1%) with postoperative infection. In 13 of these a scleral abscess and a form of endophthalmitis developed, whereas 24 had no evidence of vitreous involvement and were classified as the granuloma type. Only 43% of infected patients had positive cultures. Analysis of changes in infection rate involved comparison with changes over the years in suture material, implant material, performance of scleral undermining, drainage of subretinal fluid, number of previous surgical procedures, age of patient, use of diathermy or cryotherapy, and type of prophylactic antibiotic therapy. During the 13 years studied the rate of infection decreased from 2.2% to 0.7%. Treatment requires surgical removal of all foreign material before the inflammatory signs can be cleared. Concurrent appropriate antibiotic therapy also is recommended. With this form of treatment, all but one patient showed a satisfactory response, although 4 patients still have mild conjunctival congestion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

[Second trimester cerclage of short cervixes: which technique to use? A retrospective study of 25 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pregnancy outcome after therapeutic or emergency cerclage performed on the basis of clinical or/and ultrasound cervical modifications noted before 26 weeks of gestation and to precise which surgical procedure (Shirodkar or McDonald) is the most appropriate in these indications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study between January 1(st) 1996 and December 31(st) 2001 on 25 clinical charts of patients with suspected cervical incompetence who had second trimester cervical cerclage on the basis of clinical or ultrasound cervical length shortening. Patients with first trimester prophylactic cervical cerclage were excluded from analysis. The choice between the two surgical procedures (Shirodkar or McDonald) depended on surgeon preference but the two groups were identical for previous obstetrical history, time of cerclage and cervical modifications. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi 2 test or t-test according to the type of variables. RESULTS: In our series, 9 patients had cervical cerclage performed with Shirodkar (S) procedure and 16 had McDonald cerclage (MD). Mean operating time (S: 52 +/- 18 minutes; MD: 39 +/- 3 minutes; p=0.1) and mean hospital stay (S: 5.2 +/- 1.3 days; MD: 5.3 +/- 1.5 days; p=0.9) were not significantly different between the two procedures. The difference in mean gestational age at delivery, (S: 35.7 +/- 3.2 Wks; MD: 33.2 +/- 2.9 Wks; p=0.5) and in the number of premature deliveries before 32 completed weeks (S: 22.2%; MD: 43.7%; p=0.4) better in Shirodkar group didn't reach statistical signification. No statistical difference was noted in the number of admission in neonatal intensive care unit (S: 22.2%; MD: 31.2%; p=0.9) and in neonatal survival (S: 1 neonatal death; MD: 1 neonatal death) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: No conclusion regarding the most appropriate cervical cerclage procedure can be drawn from our study. However, Shirodkar procedure seems preferable to us due to tendency in a higher mean gestational age at delivery and because it didn't appeared to be longer or more difficult procedure. Multicentric studies may probably give better knowledge in this topic.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth.

BACKGROUND: Removal of wisdom teeth is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the UK. Little controversy surrounds the removal of impacted third molars when they are associated with pathological changes such as infection, non-restorable carious lesions, cysts, tumours, and destruction of adjacent teeth and bone. However, the justification for prophylactic removal of impacted third molars is less certain and has been debated for many years. OBJECTIVES: To provide a summary of existing evidence on prophylactic removal of impacted wisdom teeth, in terms of the incidence of surgical complications associated with prophylactic removal, and the morbidity associated with retention. METHODS: A systematic review of the research literature was undertaken. METHODS - DATA SOURCES: An existing review formed the basis of this report, and additional literature searches were undertaken, including searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, 1984-99; EMBASE, 1984-99; Science Citation Index, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, National Research Register; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness), paper sources (including Clinical Evidence), and web-based resources. Relevant organisations and professional bodies were contacted for further information. METHODS - STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected for inclusion if they met the following criteria: (1) design - randomised controlled trials (RCTs), literature reviews, or decision analyses; (2) participants - people with unerupted or impacted third molars, or those undergoing surgical removal of third molars either as prophylaxis or due to associated pathological changes; (3) reported outcomes - either the pathological changes associated with retention of third molars, or post-operative complications following extraction. There were no language restrictions on study selection. METHODS - DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data from included studies were extracted into structured tables and individual study validity was assessed against methodological checklists. Data were summarised descriptively. Decisions relating to study selection, data extraction and validity assessment were made by two independent reviewers, and disagreements were resolved by discussion. For non-English papers, translators were recruited to assist with study selection and data extraction. RESULTS: Forty studies were included in the review: two RCTs, 34 literature reviews, and four decision analysis studies. One RCT in the UK focused on the effects of retained third molars on incisor crowding (predominantly a cosmetic problem) in patients who had previously undergone orthodontic treatment. The results of this trial suggested that the removal of third molars to prevent late incisor crowding cannot be justified. Another on-going RCT in Denmark compares the effects and costs of prophylactic removal of third molars with removal according to morbidity. So far, this trial has recruited 200 participants, and preliminary results indicate that watchful waiting may be a promising strategy. However, more data and longer follow-up of patients are needed to conclude which treatment strategy is the most cost-effective. It is also known that a trial is on-going in the USA but no results are available so far. The methodological quality of the literature reviews was generally poor, and none of the reviews was systematic. Conclusions from nine reviews on anterior crowding suggested that there was only a weak association between retention of third molars and crowding. Six out of 21 reviews with a more general scope also concluded that the prophylactic removal of third molars was unjustified. Twelve general reviews did not conclude with a clear message about the management of third molars. Three reviews suggested that prophylactic removal of third molars is appropriate, but these reviews were of poorer methodological quality than the majority of other reviews. Three out of four papers focusing on surgical management expressed

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2006

Sturge-Weber syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a rare neurocutaneous syndrome the main clinical features of which are facial, mostly unilateral nevi, leptomeningeal angiomatosis, and congenital glaucoma. The interest of this syndrome for pediatric neurosurgeons is mainly related to the association of SWS with epilepsy in 75-90% of the cases. Seizures are resistant to medical treatment in almost 60% of these patients that consequently should be evaluated for epilepsy surgery. INDICATIONS TO SURGICAL TREATMENT: Children with SWS and drug-resistant epilepsy are optimal candidates for disconnective or resective surgical procedures in terms of both seizure control and intellectual outcomes. Controversies, however, still exist between the advantages of early "prophylactic" operation vs later surgical interventions. Though better results in terms of seizures control and psychomotor development were reported in a limited series of children operated on early in life, the insufficient number of subjects who underwent the surgical treatment does not allow definite conclusions yet. NEUROSURGICAL TECHNIQUES: Visually guided lobectomy with complete excision of the angiomatous cortex should be considered as the primary surgical procedure in patients with focal lesions. Hemispherectomy is the treatment of choice in children with extensive hemispheric lesions.

Diagnostic Imaging↗
PubMed1988

Malignant hyperthermia in plastic surgery.

Malignant hyperthermia is a seemingly rare genetic myopathy. Hypermetabolic crisis accompanied by a rise in body temperature to as high as 44 degrees C is its hallmark. Malignant hyperthermia is usually triggered by potent inhalated anesthetics and/or depolarizing muscle relaxants. Because of the extraordinary risk of death in patients who are at risk, plastic surgeons may be reluctant to operate on these patients. Five such patients were referred to the Plastic Surgery Service and the UCLA Malignant Hyperthermia Center for anesthetic and surgical management following plastic surgical procedures aborted for first episodes of malignant hyperthermia. They were anesthetized with nitrous oxide, barbiturates, opiates, tranquilizers, and nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. The patients were not treated prophylactically with dantrolene. Cardiac monitoring, end-tidal pCO2, and rectal temperatures were followed. After completion of their plastic surgical procedures, all five patients had a vastus lateralis muscle biopsy performed and subsequent caffeine/halothane contracture studies completed. The contracture study was positive in all patients studied. No anesthetic or surgical complications were encountered. This study demonstrates that patients at risk of developing malignant hyperthermia crisis can have plastic surgical procedures performed safely while undergoing appropriately selected general anesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Prophylaxis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Routine prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is justified by the importance of these complications as sources of major morbidity and mortality in otherwise healthy patients more than 40 years old undergoing extensive elective operations. As no one prophylactic technique is ideal, the continuing controversy is over the choice of technique for each patient. Appropriate selection of a prophylactic technique requires a careful preoperative assessment based upon the relative risk of thromboembolism due to associated disease, the risk of bleeding complications secondary to an underlying bleeding diathesis, the possibility of major morbidity from unexpected postoperative bleeding determined by the anatomic site of surgical procedure and the risk of thromboembolism imposed by the surgical procedure itself (57). For patients at high risk, warfarin remains the prophylactic agent of choice. To date, the available data on combinations of mechanical and chemical techniques are incomplete and contradictory, but future studies may identify synergistic combinations. In patients at high risk who also greatly risk having bleeding complications, vena caval interruption should be considered. In patients undergoing operation at moderate risk, low dose heparin, dextran and external pneumatic compression devices are beneficial. In patients undergoing elective hip and knee operation at moderate risk, aspirin appears especially safe and effective. When major morbidity may result from anticoagulation in patients at moderate risk for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, external pneumatic compression devices, gradient elastic stockings or elevation of the leg should be used. Further carefully controlled clinical trials are needed to identify even better options for prophylaxis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of hospital and patient factors that influence the effective administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and model the patient and healthcare system factors that may interfere with the appropriate administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. DESIGN: Between 1994 and 1998, surgical-site surveillance data were collected prospectively for a cohort of eligible surgical patients. For all cases, and each individual procedure (cardiothoracic, colonic, gynecologic, orthopedic, or vascular), forward stepwise multiple logistic regression was applied to relate key hospital and patient factors to an effective first prophylactic dose (ie, appropriate administration time, dose, route, and drug). SETTING: A 450-bed, tertiary-care teaching hospital in Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 4,835 patients admitted for surgical procedures who required antimicrobial prophylaxis. RESULTS: Factors positive for an effective first prophylactic dose for all cases were when an order was written (OR, 19.7; CI95, 9.1-42.7; P < .001) and given in the operating room (OR, 13.9; CI95, 7.5-25.6; P < .001). Factors negative for an effective first prophylactic dose were beta-lactam allergy (OR, 0.49; CI95, 0.4-0.61; P < .001) and same-day surgery (OR, 0.57; CI95, 0.4-0.82; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: With few exceptions, the four factors included in the procedure models showed that when a preoperative order was written or the antibiotic was given in the operating room, a patient was more likely to receive an effective first prophylactic dose. Conversely, when a patient had a beta-lactam allergy or the surgery was performed on the day the patient was admitted, the administration of an effective first prophylactic dose was less likely.

Aged↗
PubMed1985

[Preventive antibiotic therapy and postoperative infection in orthopedic surgery. 1983 total hip prostheses].

In a previous paper the authors studied the role of aerobio-contamination in the rate of post-operative infections. In the present study, the results of 1,172 total hip prostheses performed between 1979/1982 with prophylactic antibiotics were compared with those obtained in 811 cases performed before 1979 without antibiotics. In the 1979/1982 series, there was 0,5 p. 100 of post-operative infection and in the pre- 1979 series, 3,3 p. 100. During the two periods the peri-operative environment was identical and the surgical technique was the same. The rate of infection in more than 8,000 other surgical procedures performed in the same hospital remained the same. The use of prophylactic antibiotics appears to be a valid approach. They should be used only in high-risk procedures to avoid the selective production of resistant organisms.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Dermatologists and antibiotic prophylaxis: a survey.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis is frequently used for the prevention of infection at a distant site such as the heart valve or prosthetic joint. However, there are no published data describing how dermatologists manage patients "at risk". OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to document prophylactic antibiotic use by dermatologists. METHODS: A total of 211 randomly selected community dermatologists and 69 academic dermatologic surgeons were surveyed by questionnaire to determine whether they would provide antibiotic prophylaxis in 20 different clinical situations. RESULTS: This survey showed that under certain circumstances, almost all dermatologists provide antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infection at a distant site. However, many dermatologists use antibiotics in settings with relatively little or no indication and confuse a prophylactic regimen with treatment of a superficial infection. CONCLUSION: This survey underscores the need for education and research into the prophylactic management of patients "at risk" who undergo dermatologic surgical procedures.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed2000

A multicenter randomized trial of prophylaxis with intravenous cefepime + metronidazole or ceftriaxone + metronidazole in colorectal surgery. The 230 Study Group.

We compared two prophylactic antimicrobial regimens in 615 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgical procedures. Patients ranged in age from 19 to 92 years (median 66 years); the majority were male (54.0%) and most (77.7%) had neoplastic disease. All underwent mechanical bowel preparation. Patients were randomized to receive preoperative infusions of 2 g cefepime (n=307) or 2 g ceftriaxone (n=308), followed by 500 mg metronidazole. Patients were followed for up to 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was successful in preventing primary site infections in 92.8% of patients in the cefepime + metronidazole arm and 92.9% of patients in the ceftriaxone + metronidazole arm. Both regimens were well tolerated. A single dose of cefepime + metronidazole thus seems to be a very useful alternative to other regimens for prophylaxis in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Adult↗