PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Cardiac rehabilitation in the elderly.

Rehabilitation for patients with heart disease consists of exercise training, behavioral interventions, counseling, and education with the goal of improving physiologic and psychosocial status. The Cardiac Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guidelines, recently published in the United States, list the most substantial benefits of cardiac rehabilitation as an improvement in exercise tolerance, symptoms, blood lipid levels, and psychosocial well-being, and a reduction in cigarette smoking, stress, and mortality. With the evidence-base on the elderly in the Guidelines derived from 1 non-randomized controlled trial and 7 observational studies, the efficacy and effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation is based almost exclusively on data generated on young and middle-aged males. We have located an additional 10 randomized and 2 non-randomized controlled trials published since the Guidelines, but only one provided age-specific data. The elderly are the fastest growing segment of the population, and may be more responsive to the effects of cardiac rehabilitation as they often have greater initial disability and less independence than younger patients. While referral of elderly persons to cardiac rehabilitation services appears safe and warranted in the secondary prevention of heart disease, the lack of rigorous scientific evidence has created an important clinical research and clinical policy vacuum which urgently needs to be filled.

Adult↗

The quality of research in sports journals.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research. METHODS: A sample of four major journals that present core research in sport and exercise medicine (British Journal of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, and Physical Therapy) was examined using assessment criteria taken from the READER method. RESULTS: Randomised controlled trials comprised 10% or less of all original research articles. Observational/descriptive studies were the most commonly published study design. There was a highly significant difference (p<0.0001) in the contents of the four journals but when they were compared by categorising the better quality methods together (randomised control trial, case-control, and cohort studies), the difference was not significant (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The overall pattern of publication type seems remarkably stable over medical journals, indicating that the quality of sports medicine research is comparable to that in other specialities.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Tolerability of 3-day, once-daily azithromycin suspension versus standard treatments for community-acquired paediatric infectious diseases.

Tolerability of azithromycin oral suspension, 10 mg/kg once daily for 3 days, was assessed in paediatric patients (< or = 18 years) with respiratory or skin and soft-tissue infections. Of 2425 patients evaluated, 1213 received azithromycin and 1212 received standard regimens of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, cefaclor, cefixime, ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, erythromycin, or penicillin V. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was significantly lower in patients receiving azithromycin than comparators (7.9 vs. 11.5%, P=0.003), while discontinuation rates were similar (1.0 and 1.1%, respectively). Significantly fewer gastrointestinal events were recorded for azithromycin than comparators (6.5 vs. 9.9%, P=0.002), and their duration was significantly shorter (mean 2.3 vs. 5.0 days, P=0.0001). Azithromycin paediatric oral suspension is well tolerated and associated with significantly fewer adverse events than comparators.

Adolescent↗

[Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute urinary tract problems in women].

BACKGROUND: Available guidelines for the management of symptoms of lower urinary tract infections (UTI) in women give conflicting recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Library, Medline and other sources for evidence that met explicit inclusion criteria for the relevant options and outcomes identified. The validity of included studies was assessed. Draft recommendations were widely circulated and discussed in focus groups with patients and physician assistants. RESULTS: The probability that a woman with dysuria or frequency has bacteriuria, is 80%. The probability of UTI given a negative result of a dipstick test is 50%. Evidence suggests that antibiotics will rapidly relieve symptoms, but there are limited data from placebo-controlled randomised trials. Population based studies show that many women do not visit physicians for symptoms of UTI. Women with symptoms of UTI can be treated with antibiotics without examination of the urine. Women with earlier episodes of UTI can be offered treatment by telephone. Antibiotics for three days is sufficient based on eradication of bacteriuria. Women should be seen by a physician if the symptoms are atypical. INTERPRETATION: Implementing these guidelines could result in better service to women with UTIs. More evidence about the effects of antibiotics and other treatments is needed.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Risks and benefits of rate control versus maintenance of sinus rhythm.

There are 2 fundamental approaches to managing patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF): to restore and maintain sinus rhythm with cardioversion and/or antiarrhythmic drugs, or to control the ventricular rate only. Over the past few years, there have been several important prospective clinical trials comparing rate control with rhythm control in patients with recurrent AF. The Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF) trial was the first prospective randomized study to test the hypothesis of equivalency between the 2 management strategies for AF. The trial demonstrated that rate control was not inferior to rhythm control with respect to symptoms, quality of life, or number of hospitalizations in patients with persistent AF. The Strategies of Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) trial was a pilot study that enrolled approximately 200 patients with AF who were randomized to either ventricular rate control or cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm. The results showed that over a 1-year period there was little difference in outcome in terms of morbidity or symptoms. In the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial, patients with AF and risk factors for stroke were randomized to either rhythm control or rate control, with both groups receiving anticoagulation with warfarin. There was no difference in the composite end point of death, disabling stroke or anoxic encephalopathy, major bleeding, or cardiac arrest between the 2 arms. In addition, no major differences were noted in functional status or quality of life. The Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) trial also reached a similar conclusion. Thus, rate control is an acceptable primary strategy for management of patients with recurrent AF.

Amiodarone↗

Calcium channel blockers for heart rate control in atrial fibrillation complicated by congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: To review the safety and efficacy of verapamil and diltiazem with respect to ventricular response in atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. DATA SOURCES: Pertinent articles were identified through a MEDLINE search of the English language literature from 1984 to 1993, followed by a manual search of the bibliographies of pertinent articles. STUDY SELECTION: Studies selected were case reports, controlled trials, review articles and editorials. DATA EXTRACTION: Effects of verapamil and diltiazem on hemodynamics, ventricular response in AF, clinical parameters and mortality were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: There are limited data about the effects of verapamil and diltiazem on ventricular function in patients with congestive heart failure. In vitro diltiazem has fewer negative inotropic effects than verapamil. Clinically there are some reports of hemodynamic and clinical deterioration in patients with significant LV dysfunction given verapamil although most patients improve with verapamil. There are more data concerning diltiazem in the setting of AF complicated by congestive heart failure. The drug does not appear to exacerbate heart failure, although hypotension can result. In chronic AF complicated by heart failure, there is concern that diltiazem may increase mortality. Options for therapy are digoxin, beta-blockers and atrioventricular node ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium channel blockers may have a role in the acute reduction of ventricular response in patients with AF complicated by congestive heart failure; however, their safety in chronic heart rate control remains to be proven.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

[Evaluation of preventive studies of Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 1978-1997].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current situation of clinical trial about preventive research paper on respiratory diseases in China. To stress the design of the research, and to improve the quality of the studies. METHODS: All the preventive and treatment studies of Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (1978-1997) were assessed according to evidence based medicine (EBM) standard. RESULTS: In the past 20 years, 394 preventive study papers were published, 41 were random control trial (RCT), 50 were clinical control trial (CCT), the total percentage of RCT and CCT was 23.1%, and quality problem also existed. CONCLUSIONS: The design of the study in the respiratory diseases is not rigorous, thus the accuracy of the result is greatly affected. Improving the design of the research and the statistics method is very important to improve the quality of the research.

China↗

Verapamil revisited: a transition in novel drug delivery systems and outcomes.

Verapamil, the oldest calcium-channel blocker, is now being rediscovered and reevaluated in the light of new novel drug delivery systems and new evidence-based trials. Verapamil, a phenylalkylamine, is useful in the treatment of hypertension, stable angina, and narrow QRS supraventricular arrhythmias. This calcium antagonist is effective in both young and old, and both black and white hypertensive patients, and is free of metabolic side effects. Verapamil has a well-documented history as an effective antianginal agent when directly compared with a beta-blocker, and is more effective in reducing myocardial ischemia compared with amlodipine monotherapy. Because of the short half-life of verapamil, drug delivery systems are used to prolong the duration of action. Novel drug delivery systems using encapsulated beads or a modified osmotic pump have been designed to be taken at nighttime to provide maximal blood pressure reduction in the early morning hours and effective 24-hour blood pressure control, and to avoid excessive blood pressure reduction during sleep. The Verapamil in Hypertension and Atherosclerosis Study has documented equivalent effectiveness of verapamil compared with chlorthalidone, but showed superior plaque regression and reduced events in subjects with the greatest plaques with verapamil treatment. The Angina Prognosis Study in Stockholm, comparing verapamil and metoprolol for stable angina, found no difference in total cardiovascular mortality or combined cardiovascular events. Other large ongoing randomized, multicenter trials, including Controlled-Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints and the International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study, will expand our knowledge of the role of verapamil in the treatment of hypertension.

Angina, Unstable↗

Changes in study design, gender issues, and other characteristics of clinical research published in three major medical journals from 1971 to 1991.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in study design and other characteristics of original research published in JAMA, Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) between 1971 and 1991. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study of original clinical research published in JAMA, Lancet, and NEJM during 1971, 1981, and 1991. MEASUREMENTS: Four hundred forty-four articles were independently reviewed by at least two investigators and classified according to study design and other preselected study characteristics. Changes over time were analyzed by chi-square tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables. MAIN RESULTS: Clinical results doubled, from 17% of all articles in 1971 to 35% in 1991 (p < 0.004), while case series decreased from 30% to 4% (p < 0.0001). Of 118 clinical trials, randomized controlled trials increased from 31% to 76% (p < 0.003) and nonrandomized controlled trials decreased from 42% to 8% (p < 0.002). Multicenter studies increased from 10% to 39% (p < 0.0001) and the prevalence of health services research increased from none in 1971 to 12% in 1991 (p < 0.001). The proportion of the studies explicitly excluding women from the subject population decreased from 11% in 1971 to 3% in 1991 (p < 0.03). In 1991 7% of the studies were composed entirely of men subjects, while only 0.7% of the studies were specific to men's health. Twelve percent of the studies in 1991 were specific to women's health. Between 1971 and 1991 there was no change in the prevalence of women first authors or studies addressing women's or minorities' health issues. CONCLUSIONS: Several important changes in clinical research studies published in JAMA, Lancet, and NEJM have taken place between 1971 and 1991. Clinical trials have increased in frequency, largely replacing studies containing ten or fewer subjects. Health services research has increased in prevalence, reflecting growing interest in studies addressing the delivery of health care. Our data support the hypothesis that exclusion of women from clinical research studies is an important contributor to the paucity of data concerning women's health.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

[Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of sore throat].

BACKGROUND: Available guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of sore throat give conflicting recommendations. Our aim was to develop evidence-based guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Library, Medline and other sources for systematic reviews and other evidence that met explicit inclusion criteria for all of the relevant options and outcomes we identified. The validity of included studies was assessed. Draft recommendations based on assessment of this evidence were widely circulated and discussed in focus groups with patients and physician assistants. RESULTS: Throat infections are self-limiting and complications rare. Penicillin shortens the duration of symptoms in tonsillitis caused by beta-haemolytic streptococci and reduces the risk of complications. Penicillin has adverse effects and increases the risk of reinfections. Patients with sore throat should usually be treated without antibiotics. Visiting a physician is normally unnecessary. Antibiotics should be considered in serious cases or if the patient prefers this, but should only be prescribed for throat infections caused by beta-haemolytic streptococci. The diagnosis should be based on clinical criteria and a rapid antigen test in cases of doubt. INTERPRETATION: Benefits of antibiotics must be weighed against harms. Patients should be given good information and involved in decision-making if they want antibiotics.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in hematological diseases.

In the last decade large amounts of intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v.Ig) have been used worldwide. Doubts exist as to whether this increased use is paralleled by a comparable growth of reliable data on the therapeutic effectiveness of i.v.Ig. We performed a literature search using MEDLINE from January 1981 to January 1997 and analysed articles on the use of i.v.Ig in hematological disorders and searched for published guidelines. For most hematological disorders, evidence to use i.v.Ig as first line therapy is not very strong. For many disorders no controlled trials have been performed. In published guidelines, i.v.Ig is only recommended, with a few exceptions, when other treatments have failed or are contraindicated. Therefore the increase of consumption of i.v.Ig can not be explained by an increase in established indications in hematology.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents in the prevention of colorectal cancer.

Chemoprevention refers to the use of specific natural or synthetic chemical agents to reverse, suppress, or prevent the progression to invasive cancer. The ideal chemopreventive agent is safe and nontoxic over the long term. It should be easy to take and demonstrated to be effective in randomized trials in humans. Aspirin and NSAIDs meet many of the criteria for an ideal agent. The literature on aspirin and NSAIDs makes it clear that these agents can prevent colorectal cancer and precursor adenomas. That does not mean that we should make general recommendations for their use. First, we do not know the proper dose or duration. More important, these medications are accompanied by adverse effects that can be considerable. Indeed, the Medical Letter, an authoritative, unbiased publication on drugs and therapeutics, concluded that "for primary prevention in low-risk patients, more studies are required to establish whether the beneficial effect of aspirin is great enough to compensate for the possible increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke." These recommendations were directed at the use of these medications for prevention of myocardial infarction, but the same conclusions apply to colorectal cancer: although aspirin may prevent the disease, it may increase the risk of hemorrhagic strokes or cause other adverse effects. We must accurately balance the benefits and risks of these drugs, based on the results of ongoing randomized studies, before recommending aspirin for prevention of colorectal cancer. Is there anything that we can recommend to our patients for prevention of colorectal cancer? Based on observational epidemiologic studies, it is clear that individuals who consume a diet high in vegetables and natural fibers and low in fat have a reduced risk of colon cancer and polyps. Optimal nutrient intakes for the prevention of cancer might be more readily achieved via food fortification or supplementation, but this requires more research. Regular physical exercise and maintenance of normal body weight are also protective. Until the results of definitive studies of chemopreventive agents are available, we can recommend that our patients eat a sensible diet, exercise, and avoid obesity. Such an approach should protect them from cardiovascular disease, an even deadlier condition than colorectal cancer. In the future, we need randomized prevention trials that, for logistic reasons, may need to focus on the occurrence and progression of colorectal adenomas rather than carcinoma itself. Studies that test more than one compound at a time, using factorial designs, will be more efficient. We will need better information about duration and dose, adverse side effects, molecular mechanisms, and cellular sites of NSAID activity. Ultimately, we will need to know more about the biology and molecular biology of colorectal cancer and its precursors. That information will, perhaps, permit us to design agents to interrupt the pathway to cancer and to use intermediate markers more intelligently.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Clinical experiences with the use of indole-3-pyruvic acid.

In the last few years, Indol-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) has been subjected to 5 pilot clinical trials in volunteers and a phase II study on patients affected by anxiety, with or without sleep problems. Overall, results indicated a very good safety profile, relief from anxiety and a better quality of sleep in patients treated with IPA. Moreover, the drug showed no withdrawal signs, but positive effects on mood, improving feelings of relaxation, calmness and happiness. The mechanism of action of IPA, depending on increased turnover of some indoles in the CNS, appears clearly distinct from that of benzodiazepines, suggesting that the drug might be used in the treatment of symptoms of mild anxiety and stress experienced by busy and anxious people.

Anti-Anxiety Agents↗