PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Vision Screening”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed1982

A mammoth vision screening--public relations and public service.

This paper describes the methods employed and the results of a very large vision screening program co-sponsored by the State College of Optometry SUNY and WABC-TV. The paper is designed so that other groups might organize a similar public service program.

Adult↗
PubMed1979

The influence of clinical judgment on the rate of referral from a school vision screening program.

It has been observed that black preschool children low income families have a higher than average rate of referral from a school vision screening program. One potential contributing factor results from the fact that examiners often modified the referral criteria based on their clinical judgment. This study was designed to investigate the influence of the application of clinical judgment on the proportion of referrals as a function of ethnicity and socioeconomic income level. The results suggest that modifying the referral criteria based on clinical judgment does not significantly influence the proportion of referrals based on ethnicity or socioeconomic income level.

Black or African American↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Amblyopia detection by camera: Gateway to portable, inexpensive vision screening (calibration and validation of inexpensive, pocket-sized photoscreeners).

BACKGROUND: Photoscreening can allow early detection of amblyopia. The Gateway DV-S20, and similar models of miniature, digital flash cameras, have similar optical dimensions to existing photoscreeners for less than $200. METHODS: These cameras were calibrated on known, threshold amblyogenic refractive errors induced by placing minus and toric contact lenses on a normal subject's left eye. The DV-S20 was then applied to known amblyopic patients. Students under age 7 were vision screened with patched acuity and sequential photoscreeners (MTI and Gateway). RESULTS: The digital cameras and the MTI photoscreeners produced similar magnitude interpretable crescents for amblyopiagenic refractive errors. They had very similar validation with sensitivities of 80-90% and specificities of 98% for serious eye disorders in known patients and school-aged children. CONCLUSION: Combined with careful interpretation, pocket-sized, digital flash cameras provide a portable and inexpensive digital alternative for pediatric photoscreening. A category 3 CPT code (0065T) can be used for this valid, public health technique: Amblyopia Detection By Camera (ADBC).

Alaska↗
PubMed1990

Evaluation and outcome of the vision screening programme in south Auckland intermediate schools.

Four thousand, seven hundred and fifty-nine form 1 intermediate school children (aged 11 years) in the south Auckland health district were screened in 1987. There were 88 (1.8%) new visual defects detected (defined as a visual acuity (VA) of 6/12 or worse in one or both eyes), while 103 (2.2%) wore glasses and a further 22 (0.5%) did not have their glasses available at the time of the VA test. The total prevalence of screening visual defects was 4.5%. A survey was carried out of those pupils who failed the VA screening test in the previous year and those recorded as wearing glasses. Sixty-seven (76%) of 88 children with newly detected visual defects were interviewed. An abnormal VA test was confirmed in 59 (88%), of which 39 (66%) required treatment. Thirty were prescribed glasses, of which 27 purchased them, but at the time of interview nine did not have them available. Twenty-one (20%) of the 103 children tested with glasses failed the VA test. Twenty-two children had glasses but were not wearing them at the time of the VA test. Only three of these children had a VA better than 6/12 bilaterally. These results highlight the importance of the vision screening programme in this age group and the follow up of children with known visual defects.

Child↗
PubMed1999

Vision screening of preverbal children with Teller acuity cards.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the modified Teller visual acuity test as a mass screening tool for testing visual acuity in infants and preverbal children. DESIGN: Prospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1126 healthy children undergoing mandatory examination at the Mother and Child Health Center. INTERVENTION: Visual acuity was tested by the modified Teller visual acuity test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity was measured in all children. Clinical evaluation was performed in children who failed the Teller acuity test and in a control group. RESULTS: Visual acuity was below the normal range in 5% of the children. In the study group referred for complete eye examination, there were 9% false-negative and 44% false-positive results. In the age range of 12 to 17 months, false-negative and false-positive results were obtained in 5.6% and 50% of the children, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Teller acuity card procedure can be used for vision screening in preverbal children. Testing was associated with a high rate of false-positive results.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1988

Simple procedures for comprehensive vision screening.

Visual problems can cause poor academic performance or inappropriate behavior. This article explains simple, easily administered procedures to determine if students have problems with acuity, accommodation, binocularity, or eye movements. The evaluator can use vision screening in conjunction with associated learning or behavior problems to initiate referral to the family vision care specialist.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed1988

Preschool vision screening: a service in need of rationalisation.

A survey of health districts in England and Wales was carried out at the end of 1984 to ascertain among other things the range of current programmes for preschool vision screening. The response rate was 81.3%. Altogether 94% of districts reported screening for both reduced visual acuity and squint; two districts screened for neither. A great variety of different types of tests were in use and screening was carried out at a variety of different ages. A high proportion of districts were screening children for reduced visual acuity in infancy, although screening tests applicable at this age have not been shown to be effective. Districts screened for squint between one and four times. Collection of routine monitoring information by districts was poor.

Child Health Services↗
PubMed2006

Vision screening.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Amblyopia↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Color vision screening of young children.

Early detection of congenital color vision defects is desirable, but school screening studies have been stymied by lack of a suitable test. We evaluated a new color vision test, the APT-5, for use by volunteer screeners in schools and preschools. The screeners tested 1794 children, ages 3 to 13 years, and found the APT-5 easy to use with young children ages 5 years and up. Children who failed the screening were recruited for diagnostic color vision testing; for the children ages 5 to 13 years, 56% of those who failed the screening were successfully recruited. Data analysis indicated that the false-positive rate in this age group was 1% to 2%, and that for boys in this age group the positive predictive value was 71% to 81%. Retest data indicated that most false-positives were not due to the test itself, but to other factors in the school screening situation. Two thirds of all children scored as abnormal by anomaloscopy were simple deuteranomalous, indicating that the APT-5 effectively identified even mild color defects. The results of this trial indicate that the APT-5 is suitable for school color vision screening of children ages 5 years and up.

Adolescent↗