SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “phase 3”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

A phase 3, multicenter, open label, randomized study of abarelix versus leuprolide plus daily antiandrogen in men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We compared the endocrinological and biochemical efficacy of abarelix depot, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with that of a widely used combination of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist and a nonsteroidal antiandrogen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 255 patients were randomized to receive open label 100 mg. abarelix depot or 7.5 mg. leuprolide acetate intramuscularly injection on days 1, 29, 57, 85, 113 and 141 for 24 weeks. Patients in the abarelix group received an additional injection on day 15 and those in the leuprolide acetate group received 50 mg. bicalutamide daily. Patients could continue treatment with study drug for an additional 28 weeks. The efficacy end points were the comparative rates of avoidance of testosterone surge (greater than 10% increase) within 7 days of the first injection and the rapidity of achieving reduction of serum testosterone to castrate levels (50 ng./dl. or less) on day 8. Patients were monitored for adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. RESULTS: Abarelix was more effective in avoidance of testosterone surge (p <0.001) and the rapidity of reduction of testosterone to castrate levels on day 8 (p <0.001) than combination therapy. No significant difference was seen between the groups in the initial rate of decline of serum prostate specific antigen or the ability to achieve and maintain castrate levels of testosterone. No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Abarelix as monotherapy achieves medical castration significantly more rapidly than combination therapy and avoids the testosterone surge characteristic of agonist therapy. Both treatments were equally effective in reducing serum prostate specific antigen, and achieving and maintaining castrate levels of testosterone.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid topical solution and visible blue light in the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp: investigator-blinded, phase 3, multicenter trials.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 20% wt/vol aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (hereinafter "ALA") and visible blue light for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, uneven parallel-group study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients (N = 243) were randomized to receive vehicle or ALA followed within 14 to 18 hours by PDT. Follow-up visits occurred 24 hours and 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks following PDT. Target lesions remaining at week 8 were re-treated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical response based on lesion clearing by week 8. RESULTS: Most patients in both groups had 4 to 7 lesions. Complete response rates for patients with 75% or more of the treated lesions clearing at weeks 8 and 12 were 77% (128/166) and 89% (133/149), respectively, for the drug group and 18% (10/55) and 13% (7/52), respectively, for the vehicle group (P<.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel general association test). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rates at week 8 was 46.9% to 71.0% and at week 12, 65.3% to 86.3%. The week 12 response rate includes 30% of patients who received a second treatment. Most patients experienced erythema and edema at the treated sites, which resolved or improved within 1 to 4 weeks after therapy, and stinging or burning during light treatment, which decreased or resolved by 24 hours after light treatment. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that topical ALA PDT is an effective and safe treatment for multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed1999

A randomized phase 3 study of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with stem cell factor and filgrastim in high-risk breast cancer patients.

This randomized study compared the number of leukaphereses required to collect an optimal target yield of 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) peripheral blood progenitor cells/kg, using either stem cell factor (SCF) at 20 micrograms/kg/d in combination with Filgrastim at 10 micrograms/kg/d or Filgrastim alone at 10 micrograms/kg/d, from 203 patients with high-risk stage II, III, or IV breast cancer. Leukapheresis began on day 5 of cytokine administration and continued daily until the target yield of CD34(+) cells had been reached or a maximum of 5 leukaphereses performed. By day 5 of leukapheresis, 63% of the patients treated with SCF plus Filgrastim (n = 100) compared with 47% of those receiving Filgrastim alone (n = 103) reached the CD34(+) cell target yield. There was a clinically and statistically significant reduction (P <.05) in the number of leukaphereses required to reach the target yield for the patients receiving SCF plus Filgrastim (median, 4 leukaphereses) compared with patients receiving Filgrastim alone (median, 6 or more leukapherses; ie, <50% of patients reached the target in 5 leukaphereses). All patients receiving SCF were premedicated with antihistamines, albuterol, and pseudoephedrine. Treatment was safe, generally well tolerated, and not associated with life-threatening or fatal toxicity. In conclusion, SCF plus Filgrastim is a more effective peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC)-mobilization regimen than Filgrastim alone. In addition to the potential for reduced leukapheresis-related morbidity and costs, SCF offers additional options for obtaining cells for further graft manipulation.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Safety and efficacy of tigecycline in treatment of skin and skin structure infections: results of a double-blind phase 3 comparison study with vancomycin-aztreonam.

In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 546 patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections received tigecycline 100 mg/day (a 100-mg initial dose and then 50 mg intravenously twice daily) or the combination of vancomycin 2 g/day (1 g intravenously twice daily) and aztreonam 4 g/day (2 g intravenously twice daily) for up to 14 days. The primary end point was the clinical response in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations at the test-of-cure visit 12 to 92 days after the last dose. The microbiologic response at the test-of-cure visit was also assessed. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory results, and adverse event reporting. Five hundred twenty patients were included in the c-mITT population (tigecycline group, n = 261; combination group, n = 259), and 436 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline group, n = 223; combination group, n = 213). The clinical responses in the tigecycline and the combination vancomycin and aztreonam groups were similar in the c-mITT population (84.3% versus 86.9%; difference, -2.6% [95% confidence interval, -9.0, 3.8]; P = 0.4755) and the CE population (89.7% versus 94.4%; difference, -4.7% [95% confidence interval, -10.2, 0.8]; P = 0.1015). Microbiologic eradication (documented or presumed) occurred in 84.8% of the patients receiving tigecycline and 93.2% of the patients receiving vancomycin and aztreonam (difference, -8.5 [95% confidence interval, -16.0, -1.0]; P = 0.0243). The numbers of patients reporting adverse events were similar in the two groups, with increased nausea and vomiting rates in the tigecycline group and an increased incidence of rash and increases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels in the combination vancomycin and aztreonam group. Tigecycline was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Long-term survival advantage for women treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with topotecan in a phase 3 randomized study of recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Provide long-term follow-up data for women treated in a randomized multicenter study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with topotecan. METHODS: Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer that recurred after or failed to respond to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) every 28 days (n = 239) or topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days every 21 days (n = 235). Patients were stratified prospectively based on response to initial platinum-based chemotherapy as well as the presence or absence of bulky disease. Most patients had been previously treated with platinum and taxanes (74% in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin group and 72% in the topotecan group). Survival data are mature: 87% of patients have died (n = 413). RESULTS: There was an 18% reduction in the risk of death for patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (median survival 62.7 weeks for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 59.7 weeks for topotecan-treated patients; HR = 1.216; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.000-1.478; P = 0.050). The hazard ratio for all randomized subjects (includes those randomized, but never treated; n = 481) was 1.23 (median survival 63.6 weeks for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 57.0 weeks for topotecan-treated patients; 95% CI 1.01-1.50; P = 0.038). For patients with platinum-sensitive disease, there was a 30% reduction in the risk of death for the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-treated group (median survival 107.9 weeks for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 70.1 weeks for topotecan-treated patients; HR = 1.432; 95% CI 1.066-1.923; P = 0.017). In patients with platinum-refractory disease, survival was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up demonstrates that treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin significantly prolongs survival compared with topotecan in patients with recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. The survival benefit is pronounced in patients with platinum-sensitive disease.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Quinine as a multidrug resistance inhibitor: a phase 3 multicentric randomized study in adult de novo acute myelogenous leukemia.

Based on our previous demonstration that quinine could be used clinically to reverse P-glycoprotein-mediated resistance, we designed a multicenter, randomized trial aiming to determine whether quinine would improve the survival of adult patients (15-60 years old) with de novo acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). These patients randomly received (n = 213) or did not receive (n = 212) a 30 mg/kg/day continuous intravenous infusion of quinine in combination with induction chemotherapy combining idarubicine and cytarabine and, depending on bone marrow examination at day 20, an additional course of cytarabine and mitoxantrone. The mean steady-state quinine concentration was 7.8 mg/L and the mean multidrug resistance reversing activity of serum was 1.96. Complete remission (CR) was obtained in 344 patients (80.9%) without significant influence of quinine. Of the patients in complete remission, 82 were assigned to receive HLA-matched bone marrow transplants, whereas 262 were assigned to 2 courses of intensive consolidation chemotherapy, with or without quinine, depending on initial randomization. The 4-year actuarial overall survival (OS) of the 425 eligible patients was 42.0% +/- 2.5%, without significant influence of quinine. Of 160 patients who could be studied, 54 demonstrated rhodamine 123 efflux. In these patients, quinine significantly improved the CR rate from 12 of 25 (48.0%) to 24 of 29 (82.8%) (P =.01). However, there was no significant difference in OS. Neither mdr1 gene nor P-glycoprotein expression influenced the outcome. We conclude that quinine does not improve the survival of adult patients with de novo AML, even though it improves CR rate in a small subgroup of patients defined by rhodamine 123 efflux.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed2001

A phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of abarelix versus leuprolide acetate in men with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the levels of testosterone and other hormones in men with prostate cancer treated with abarelix versus leuprolide acetate. METHODS: Patients (n = 269) were randomized to receive open-label abarelix 100 mg or leuprolide acetate 7.5 mg by intramuscular injection. The results of the first 84 days of the study are reported. The primary efficacy endpoints included avoidance of testosterone surge, castration on day 8, and achievement and maintenance of castration from days 29 through 85. The secondary endpoints included castration on days 2, 4, and 15; a reduction in prostate-specific antigen level; and measurements of other hormones. Patients were monitored for clinical adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. RESULTS: No men in the abarelix group and 82% of men in the leuprolide acetate group experienced a testosterone surge (P <0.001). Abarelix caused rapid medical castration: 24% of men 1 day after treatment and 78% after 7 days compared with 0% of men treated with leuprolide acetate on either day. A comparable percentage of men achieved and maintained castration between days 29 and 85 in each group. Prostate-specific antigen had a statistically significant decrease for the first month in patients treated with abarelix. Dihydrotestosterone, luteinizing hormone, prostate-specific antigen, and follicle-stimulating hormone showed similar rapid reductions without an initial increase. The overall occurrence of adverse events was similar across the treatment groups, and most were sequelae of comorbid disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with abarelix produced a higher percentage of patients who avoided a testosterone surge and had a more rapid time to testosterone suppression with a higher rate of medical castration 1 day after treatment and greater reductions in testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and dihydrotestosterone during the first 2 weeks of treatment compared with leuprolide acetate. The achievement and maintenance of castration was comparable between the two groups.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Clinical response to alefacept: results of a phase 3 study of intramuscular administration of alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of psoriasis as a T-cell-mediated immune disease has led to the development of various therapeutic approaches directed against the pathogenic T cells. Alefacept, a novel and selective biological recombinant protein, binds CD2 on T cells to block T-cell activation and proliferation and interacts with FcgammaRIII receptors on accessory cells to produce selective T-cell apoptosis. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly alefacept IM compared with placebo given for 12 weeks to patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Multicentre (63 sites in Europe, the USA, and Canada), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing 10 mg and 15 mg of alefacept and placebo administered IM once weekly for 12 weeks. Patients were followed for an additional 12 weeks after cessation of therapy. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they were > or = 18 years of age, had chronic plaque psoriasis for > or = 12 months involving > or = 10% body surface area, and had CD4+ T-cell counts at or above the lower limit of normal. RESULTS: 507 patients were enrolled into three treatment groups, which were well balanced for demographic, baseline disease characteristics, and treatment history. A significantly greater percentage of patients treated with alefacept 15 mg IM achieved > or = 75% PASI reduction from baseline 2 weeks after the last dose compared with placebo (21% vs. 5%, P < 0.001); 12% of patients treated with alefacept 10 mg IM reached this level of improvement (P = NS vs. placebo). Alefacept was well tolerated, with adverse events similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with alefacept 15 mg IM provided highly significant improvements in all measures of psoriasis disease activity compared with placebo. Pharmacodynamic data confirmed that alefacept is a selective biological agent that reduces memory-effector T cells (CD4+CD45RO+ and CD8+CD45RO+), the source of the pathogenic mediators of psoriasis, while having relatively no effect on naive T-cell populations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2026

Quality of life with palbociclib plus tamoxifen in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from PATHWAY, an Asian international, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the Asian international PATHWAY trial, palbociclib-tamoxifen demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with placebo-tamoxifen in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). This analysis compared quality of life (QoL) between treatment arms. METHODS: Pre/peri or postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- ABC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive palbociclib-tamoxifen or placebo-tamoxifen. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed on day 1 of cycles 1 (baseline), 4, and 7, and at the end of treatment (EOT) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. Least-square mean (LSM) changes in scores from baseline were calculated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate time to deterioration (TTD) in the minimally important difference (MID) in the pain subscale. RESULTS: In the comparison between treatment arms, no significant differences were observed in LSM changes in scores from baseline in global QoL (cycle 4: 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): -5.00, 6.41]; cycle 7: 2.17 [95% CI: -4.14, 8.48]; EOT: -5.19 [95% CI: -11.64, 1.26]). For both the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 functional and symptom subscales, no clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms were found in the LSM changes in scores from baseline. Median TTD in the MID in the pain subscale was 32.5 months (95% CI: 11.7, not estimable) for the palbociclib-tamoxifen arm and 21.2 months (95% CI: 5.5, 43.5) for the placebo-tamoxifen arm (hazard ratio = 0.729 [95% CI: 0.467, 1.138]). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of palbociclib and tamoxifen delayed deterioration in patients' QoL while they experienced reduced risk for disease progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03423199; study registration date: February 6, 2018.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

The clinical evaluation committee in a large multicenter phase 3 trial of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis (PROWESS): role, methodology, and results.

OBJECTIVE: In the multinational PROWESS trial, drotrecogin alfa (activated) significantly reduced mortality rate in patients with severe sepsis compared with placebo. The use of large multiple-center trials can potentially complicate interpretation of results in severe sepsis populations because of variability in medical attitudes and practices and the frequency of confounding events such as protocol violations. The objective of this study was to perform a blinded, critical, integrated review of data from the 1,690 severe sepsis patients from 164 medical centers enrolled in the PROWESS trial using a Clinical Evaluation Committee. DESIGN: Blinded, critical, integrated review of data. SETTING: Participating sites. PATIENTS: The 1,690 severe sepsis patients from 164 medical centers enrolled in the PROWESS trial. INTERVENTIONS: We performed analyses of the optimal cohort, defined as patients who had full compliance with the protocol, had evidence of an infection, and received adequate anti-infective therapy. We also performed other analyses, including significant underlying disorders, life support measures, and causes of death. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The optimal cohort of 81.4% of the intention-to-treat population [drotrecogin alfa (activated), n = 695; placebo, n = 680] had similar baseline severity of illness between the two groups, a similar pharmacodynamic effect, and a relative risk of death estimate consistent with that observed in the overall PROWESS trial (0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.99 vs. 0.806, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.94). A beneficial effect of drotrecogin alfa (activated) similarly was observed in patients with significant underlying disorders (0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.93) who were more severely ill and had a higher percentage of patients forgoing life-sustaining therapy. In contrast with the original investigator determinations, a benefit associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in urinary tract infection adjudicated by the Clinical Evaluation Committee was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The survival benefit associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) use was consistent with the results of the overall trial regardless of whether patients met criteria of the optimal cohort or had a significant underlying disorder.

APACHE↗

PubMed2002