PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia, Intravenous”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Total intravenous anesthesia is best for neurological surgery.

We believe that today balanced TIVA represents the best anesthetic technique for neurological surgery. Freely acknowledging that this point of view is unproven (36) with regard to the hard criterion of patient outcome on leaving the hospital, we submit that the intermediate or surrogate criteria discussed make a convincing case for preferring TIVA to volatile-based anesthetic techniques. Until a study demonstrating hard outcome differences between the two techniques is achieved, we will continue to encourage the use of TIVA in neuroanesthesia, based on its practical (anesthetic depth, neuromonitoring, surgical field) and theoretical (homeostasis, metabolism, antinociception, neuroprotection) advantages.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2006

Intravenous anesthesia inhibits leukocyte-endothelial interactions and expression of CD11b after hemorrhage.

UNLABELLED: Hemorrhage increases adhesion of leukocytes to the venular endothelium, mediated by increased expression of the Mac-1 integrin complex (CD18/CD11b) present on leukocytes. Anesthetic agents may possess anti-inflammatory properties. Hence, this study determined the effects of i.v. anesthesia on leukocyte adhesion after hemorrhage in relation to expression of CD11b. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were (n = 57) anesthetized i.v. with propofol (Diprivan) and fentanyl, ketamine, or thiopental. During anesthesia, 10% of total blood volume was removed and intravital microscopy used to observe the rat mesentery and measure leukocyte (neutrophils) rolling and adhesion in postcapillary venules (15 - 25 microm). Flow cytometry was also used to determine CD11b expression on neutrophils from blood removed at the end of these experiments (n = 25) or blood incubated with anesthetic agents and activated with platelet activating factor ex vivo (0.1 micromol/L) (n = 24). RESULTS: Hemorrhage increased leukocyte adhesion (stationary count per 150 microm) in rats anesthetized with thiopental (baseline, 3.4 +/- 1.2; hemorrhage, 6.7 +/- 2.0; P < 0.05) but not in those receiving either ketamine (baseline, 3.6 +/- 1.3; hemorrhage, 3.3 +/- 1.3) or propofol/fentanyl (baseline, 6.2 +/- 2.0; hemorrhage, 5.8 +/- 0.8). Neutrophils collected from thiopental-treated rats had elevated CD11b expression with thiopental (mean fluorescence baseline, 67.5 +/- 1.3; hemorrhage, 83.6 +/- 5.3; P < 0.05) but not with propofol/fentanyl (mean fluorescence baseline, 69.1 +/- 1.3; hemorrhage, 65.9 +/- 1.6), and ketamine-treated rats (mean fluorescence baseline, 74.3 +/- 2.1; hemorrhage, 74.8 +/- 1.1). Ketamine also inhibited upregulation of CD11b with platelet activating factor ex vivo. CONCLUSIONS: After hemorrhage, leukocyte adhesion and CD11b expression increased during thiopental anesthesia, but propofol/fentanyl and ketamine protected against hemorrhage-induced leukocyte adhesion. The anti-inflammatory effect of ketamine was mediated by direct inhibition of CD11b expression on leukocytes.

Anesthesia, Intravenous↗
PubMed1989

Isoflurane and intravenous anesthesia used for induction before coronary artery bypass grafting.

Induction of anesthesia with isoflurane in combination with fentanyl, thiopentone, nitrous oxide and pancuronium was studied in nine patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ejection fraction (EF) of the left ventricle was monitored with a single crystal probe linked to a microcomputer, after injection of 200 MBq Tc 99m-HSA. Stroke volume index determined by thermodilution and EF were used to calculate left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI). The degree of ischemia was numerically scored as evaluated from the ECG (modified V5 lead). The study protocol covered seven periods from awake before induction to 5 min after intubation. EF decreased moderately during intubation (P less than 0.05). Systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) was decreased (P less than 0.05) at all times except during intubation when it was unchanged compared to control. LVEDVI decreased during induction (P less than 0.05), while left ventricular filing pressure remained unchanged. Heart rate did not change. Systolic arterial pressure decreased from 147 mmHg (19.6 kPa) to about 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa) during induction (P less than 0.05). Two patients were given vasoconstrictors because of low arterial pressure. The mean ischemic score did not change. One patient, however, had signs of progressive ischemia. In this patient isoflurane administration was stopped after the last recording and the ECG normalized within 20 min.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Intraocular pressure changes during laparoscopy in patients anesthetized with propofol total intravenous anesthesia versus isoflurane inhaled anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: We examined intraocular pressure (IOP) changes during gynecologic laparoscopy performed under either thiopental-isoflurane anesthesia or total IV propofol anesthesia. Forty adult women with no preexisting eye disease scheduled for gynecologic CO(2) insufflation laparoscopy were included in the study. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, peak and plateau airway pressure, ETCO(2), and IOP (using a Schioetz tonometer) were measured at defined intervals during the procedure. IOP decreased significantly after the induction of anesthesia in both groups, and remained so throughout the procedure in the propofol group. In the isoflurane group, however, IOP was increased significantly above the preinduction level after pneumoperitoneum with head-down position. There was no correlation between IOP and blood pressure or airway pressure. In conclusion, propofol total IV anesthesia may be a better choice for laparoscopic surgery should control of IOP be a concern. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we examined the effect of two anesthetic techniques on the intraocular pressure changes during laparoscopic surgery in healthy subjects. Propofol IV anesthesia protected against increases in intraocular pressure with pneumoperitoneum and head-down position.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol for burst suppression in cerebral aneurysm surgery: preliminary report of 42 patients.

Forty-two patients underwent cerebral aneurysm clipping at our institution in 1991, 35 with a ruptured aneurysm and 7 with an unruptured aneurysm. Preoperatively, 22 patients with a ruptured aneurysm were graded I or II according to the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and 21 underwent an operation on the first day. All underwent a standard cerebral protective general anesthesia, combining propofol with fentanyl, arterial normotension (mild hypertension with volume loading and/or dopamine during temporary clipping and once the aneurysm was secured), normocarbia or slight hypocarbia, brain relaxation with lumbar drainage, mannitol and propofol, and electroencephalogram burst suppression when temporary clipping (> or = 2 min) was required. Propofol doses for induction were 1.8 +/- 0.1 mg/kg (mean +/- standard error); for maintenance, doses were 86 +/- 3.5 micrograms/kg per min; and for burst suppression doses were 500 micrograms/kg per min. After clipping, the propofol dose rate was reduced to allow early recovery and neurological examination in the operating room. In 21 patients, temporary clipping was required for a mean duration of 8.8 +/- 1.3 minutes (range, 2-29); none of these patients deteriorated as compared with their preoperative neurological state. Twenty-four of the 42 patients (57%) had a Glasgow Coma Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 1, 7 patients had a GOS score of 2, 8 had a score of 3, and 3 had a score of 5. Thirty-two patients were extubated in the operating room with a mean GOS Score of 13.2 +/- 0.5, and 10 were extubated later in the intensive care unit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2000

Total intravenous anesthesia with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cistracurium in morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: According to physical impairments of massive obesity, cardiac, respiratory and gastrointestinal physiology must be considered as much as pharmacokinetic behavior. Anesthetic management of morbidly obese patients has to be carefully planned, in order to minimize the increased risks of aspirative pneumonitis, hemodynamic instability and delay in recovery. The ideal anesthesia should provide a smooth and quick induction, allowing rapid airway control, prominent hemodynamic stability, and rapid emergence from anesthesia. To approach these ideal conditions, a Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cisatracurium was designed and analyzed. METHODS: 10 consenting morbidly obese patients scheduled for elective Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding participated in the study. TIVA with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cisatracurium was used in all cases. Time to loss of consciousness, tracheal intubation, perianesthetic physiological parameters and complications, incidence of awareness with recall, recovery times, postoperative analgesia and costs of drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: The analyzed data showed adequate time and physiological conditions for induction and tracheal intubation, stable maintenance with easy handling of deepness, low incidence of perianesthetic complications, excellent recovery performance and institutional efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: TIVA with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cisatracurium was found to be effective, secure, predictable and economic for the anesthetic management of morbidly obese patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Total intravenous anesthesia versus single breath technique and anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane for bariatric operations.

BACKGROUND: The choice of anesthetic technique for general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients remains controversial. We aimed to compare blood gases, recovery and hemodynamic parameters using TIVA and sevoflurane anesthesia in bariatric surgery. METHODS: The study was performed with permission of the ethics committee. We studied 40 morbidly obese patients allocated to 2 groups. The total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA) group was named Group T, and the sevoflurane group was named Group S. In Group T, anesthesia induction was achieved with propofol. In Group S, anesthesia induction was achieved by sevoflurane with single breath technique, with maintenance provided with 1-2% volume sevoflurane. Student t, Chi square and ANOVA tests were used for data analysis; p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in demographic data, blood gas values and recovery characteristic. Hemodynamic values were significantly lower in Group T than Group S, during and after the operative period. CONCLUSION: While sevoflurane induction and maintenance is a suitable anesthetic modality for obese patients, TIVA can be applied easily in those patients possessing no extra risk factors other than morbid obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Use of a combination of propofol and fentanyl, alfentanil, or sufentanil for total intravenous anesthesia in cats.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cardiorespiratory effects of an i.v. infusion of propofol alone or in association with fentanyl, alfentanil, or sufentanil in cats and, for each combination, the minimal infusion rate of propofol that would inhibit a response to noxious stimuli. DESIGN: Randomized crossover study. ANIMALS: 6 cats. PROCEDURE: Cats were anesthetized 4 times in random order. After i.v. administration of fentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil, or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution, anesthesia was induced with propofol (7 mg/kg 13.2 mg/lb], i.v.) and maintained for 90 minutes with a continuous infusion of propofol in conjunction with fentanyl (0.1 microg/kg/min [0.045 microg/lb/min]), alfentanil (0.5 microg/kg/min [0.23 microg/lb/min]), sufentanil (0.01 microg/kg/min [0.004 microg/lb/min]), or saline solution (0.08 mL/kg/min [0.036 mL/lb/min]). RESULTS: Minimal infusion rate of propofol required to prevent a response to a noxious stimulus was higher when cats received saline solution. After 70 minutes, minimal infusion rate of propofol was significantly higher with fentanyl than with sufentanil. Decreases in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, rectal temperature, and respiratory rate were detected with all treatments. Oxygen saturation did not change significantly, but end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide increased with all treatments. There were no significant differences in recovery times or sedation and recovery scores among treatments. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that infusion of propofol in combination with fentanyl, alfentanil, or sufentanil results in satisfactory anesthesia in cats.

Alfentanil↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol or ketamine-medetomidine-propofol combination in horses.

Objective-To compare the anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of total IV anesthesia with propofol (P-TIVA) or a ketamine-medetomidine-propofol combination (KMP-TIVA) in horses. Design-Randomized experimental trial. Animals-12 horses. Procedure-Horses received medetomidine (0.005 mg/kg [0.002 mg/lb], IV). Anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.04 mg/kg [0.018 mg/lb], IV) and ketamine (2.5 mg/kg [1.14 mg/lb], IV). All horses received a loading dose of propofol (0.5 mg/kg [0.23 mg/lb], IV), and 6 horses underwent P-TIVA (propofol infusion). Six horses underwent KMP-TIVA (ketamine [1 mg/kg/h {0.45 mg/lb/h}] and medetomidine [0.00125 mg/kg/h {0.0006 mg/lb/h}] infusion; the rate of propofol infusion was adjusted to maintain anesthesia). Arterial blood pressure and heart rate were monitored. Qualities of anesthetic induction, transition to TIVA, and maintenance of and recovery from anesthesia were evaluated. Results-Administration of KMP IV provided satisfactory anesthesia in horses. Compared with the P-TIVA group, the propofol infusion rate was significantly less in horses undergoing KMP-TIVA (0.14 +/- 0.02 mg/kg/min [0.064 +/- 0.009 mg/lb/min] vs 0.22 +/- 0.03 mg/kg/min [0.1 +/- 0.014 mg/lb/min]). In the KMP-TIVA and P-TIVA groups, anesthesia time was 115 +/- 17 minutes and 112 +/- 11 minutes, respectively, and heart rate and arterial blood pressure were maintained within acceptable limits. There was no significant difference in time to standing after cessation of anesthesia between groups. Recovery from KMP-TIVA and P-TIVA was considered good and satisfactory, respectively. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-In horses, KMP-TIVA and P-TIVA provided clinically useful anesthesia; the ketamine-medetomidine infusion provided a sparing effect on propofol requirement for maintaining anesthesia.

Anesthesia, Intravenous↗