PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

SHBG, testosterone, androstenedione, 17-OH-Progesterone plasma levels in PCO affected women treated with a triphasic oral contraceptive.

A triphasic oral contraceptive Trigynon (Schering) or Triphasil (Wyeth) was administered to 13 anovulatory women with hyperandrogenism, enlarged polycystic ovaries and reversal of LH/FSH ratio. After three months of treatment total Testosterone, Androstenedione and 17-OH-Progesterone levels significantly decreased while SHBG significantly increased. Reduction of hair growth and improvement of acne were noted. Side effects were minimal.

17-alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone↗
PubMed2004

Ovarian function with the contraceptive vaginal ring or an oral contraceptive: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The effects on ovarian function of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) were compared. METHODS: This randomized, open-label study was performed in 40 healthy female volunteers, who were randomized by a computer-generated list after stratification for the ovulation day in a pretreatment cycle. They received two cycles of NuvaRing (21 subjects) or a COC (30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel, 19 subjects). NuvaRing was started on cycle day 5, COC on cycle day 1. Follicular diameter, endometrial thickness and FSH, LH, 17beta-estradiol (E2) and progesterone concentrations were determined. RESULTS: The median maximum follicular diameter (maxFD) was < or =11 mm during treatment. In the first treatment cycle the maxFD was lower in the COC than in the NuvaRing group, due to the different starting procedures. MaxFD were not different in the second treatment cycle. In both groups, E2 and progesterone levels remained low during treatment. Ovulations did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, ovarian activity was adequately suppressed. Due to the different starting procedures, lower ovarian activity was observed in the COC group in the first treatment cycle. In the second cycle, ovarian suppression was comparable with NuvaRing and COC treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.

Side effects caused by oral contraceptives discourage compliance with and continuation of oral contraceptives. A suggested disadvantage of biphasic oral contraceptive pills compared to triphasic oral contraceptive pills is an increase in breakthrough bleeding. We examined this potential disadvantage by conducting a systematic review comparing biphasic oral contraceptives with triphasic oral contraceptives in terms of efficacy, cycle control, and discontinuation because of side effects. We included randomized, controlled trials comparing any biphasic oral contraceptive with any triphasic oral contraceptive when used to prevent pregnancy. Only two trials of limited quality met our inclusion criteria. Larranaga compared two biphasic and one triphasic pills, each containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol. No important differences emerged, and the frequency of discontinuation because of medical problems was similar with all three pills. Percival-Smith compared a biphasic pill containing norethindrone (Ortho 10/11) with a triphasic pill containing levonorgestrel (Triphasil) and another triphasic pill containing norethindrone (Ortho 7/7/7). The biphasic pill had inferior cycle control compared with the levonorgestrel triphasic pill. The available evidence is limited and of poor quality; the internal validity of these trials is questionable. Given that caveat, the biphasic pill containing norethindrone was associated with inferior cycle control compared with the triphasic pill containing levonorgestrel. This suggests that the choice of progestin may be more important that the phasic regimen in determining bleeding patterns.

Contraception↗
PubMed1998

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk in Taiwan, a country of low incidence of breast cancer and low use of oral contraceptives.

One hundred and seventy four (81% of all) pathologically confirmed new incident cases of female breast cancer identified from a medical center in Taipei from February, 1993 to June, 1994 were selected as the case group. Four hundred and fifty three inpatient controls who were without obstetric-gynecological, breast, or malignant diseases were individually matched for each case by age and date of admission. Information was obtained through direct interview and review of medical records. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of each risk factor. After adjusting for education level, body mass index, age at menarche and first full-term pregnancy, parity, menopausal status and age at menopause, lifetime lactation, use of lactation inhibition hormones, and family history of breast cancer, breast cancer risk significantly elevated in use of OC before 25 years old and before 1971. In stratified analysis, significantly higher risk were found in OC use before 25 years old and in duration of use less than one year among post-menopausal subjects. Our results support the notion that OC use in early life for younger women and in early calendar years increase breast cancer risk.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1985

A randomized double-blind study of the effects of two low-dose combined oral contraceptives on biochemical aspects. Report from a seven-centred study. WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Task force on Oral Contraceptives.

A comparative study of the metabolic effects of two combined oral contraceptive preparations was undertaken in seven WHO Collaborating Centres for Research in Human Reproduction. A total of 847 subjects were randomly allocated to one of two pill groups - norethisterone lmg/ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms (NET/EE) or levonorgestrel 150 micrograms/ethinyl estradiol 30 micrograms (LNG/EE). An additional 195 women using an IUD served as a comparison group. Blood samples were taken on admission, and at 3 and 12 months thereafter. Both pills induced changes in fasting and 2-hour glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and total protein, but not aspartate aminotransferase. The most dramatic and probably most clinically important changes were an increase in triglycerides and a decrease in HDL-cholesterol. The NET/EE preparation appeared to induce a greater increase in triglycerides, but no significant difference was found between the two pill preparations with respect to HDL-cholesterol changes.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Contraceptive efficacy of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing desogestrel.

Desogestrel, a new gonane progestin, has been shown to be comparable in efficacy with oral contraceptives currently in use in the United States. Results from several large efficacy studies conducted in Europe encompassing 42,640 patients in 183,212 cycles resulted in six pregnancies for a Pearl index of 0.04. This low rate, which was compared with those observed in recent U.S. clinical trials, reflects differences in study methodology. An additional indicator of an oral contraceptive's efficacy is its ability to suppress ovarian function, including follicular development and increases in plasma estradiol levels. Desogestrel has been found to be among the strongest suppressors of ovarian activity.

Contraceptives, Oral↗
PubMed2004

A comparative study on the effects of a contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing and an oral contraceptive on carbohydrate metabolism and adrenal and thyroid function.

OBJECTIVES: To compare carbohydrate metabolism, adrenal and thyroid function during use of a combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing, NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) with those of a combined oral contraceptive. METHODS: Healthy women aged 18-40 years used either the vaginal ring, delivering 15 microg ethinylestradiol and 120 microg of etonogestrel per day, or a combined oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel, for six cycles. Each cycle comprised 3 weeks of use of the ring or the pill followed by 1 ring- or pill-free week. The following parameters were measured at baseline and at the end of cycles 3 and 6: carbohydrate metabolism (glucose, insulin, glycosylated hemoglobin); adrenal function (total cortisol, cortisol binding globulin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate); thyroid function (thyroid stimulating hormone, free thyroxine). RESULTS: Small and similar increases in insulin were seen in both groups. Concentrations of cortisol binding globulin and total cortisol rose significantly less during ring use than during combined oral contraceptive use (cycle 3, p= 0.0002; cycle 6, p < 0.0001). Levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate did not change in either group. Thyroid stimulating hormone levels increased significantly more in the ring group at cycle 3 (p = 0.0016) but free thyroxine levels were unchanged in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both the vaginal ring and the oral contraceptive have no clinically relevant effects on carbohydrate metabolism, adrenal or thyroid function.

Adolescent↗