SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of typhoid fever. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Typhoid fever is an acute febrile illness caused by Salmonella typhi. The evidence of blood-borne infection required for study entry includes clinical signs and symptoms plus confirmation of the presence of S. typhi in blood or other tissues or body fluids. The preferred study design is prospective and randomized with an active concurrent control. It is preferred that the investigator or an evaluator be blinded to therapy. In general, treatment should be administered for 2 weeks until it is demonstrated that a shorter course is as efficacious and as safe. Follow-up cultures of specimens from sites originally shown to be infected with S. typhi should be performed unless the diagnostic procedure places the patient at unnecessary risk.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of cholera. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Cholera is an acute gastrointestinal infection caused by Vibrio cholerae. It is characterized by watery diarrhea that may lead to massive fluid loss, which in turn may result in hypotension, shock, and death within hours. Key to the treatment of cholera is fluid replacement. Anti-infective therapy decreases the severity and duration of diarrhea and the duration of shedding of V. cholerae. Enrolled patients should have diarrhea that is moderate to severe and a culture that ultimately yields V. cholerae. A prospective, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial is preferred. Studies should be double-blinded or evaluator-blinded. The rapidity with which the organism is eliminated from stool may be assessed. Both clinical and microbiological outcome should be determined. Assessment of microbiological eradication is paramount, since fluid replacement may suffice for treatment of signs and symptoms.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of diarrhea caused by Giardia lamblia. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Giardia lamblia is a flagellate protozoan that produces symptoms by infecting the small bowel and biliary tract in the trophozoite form. Diagnosis is currently established by microscopic visualization of the organism in appropriate intestinal contents (stool, small-bowel contents, or biopsy specimen). Adult patients with diarrhea and one or more enteric symptoms may be enrolled in clinical trials of new drugs for the treatment of giardial disease. A randomized, double-blind, active-concurrent-control design is recommended. Post hoc stratification by age, immune status, chronicity of disease, and ease of establishing diagnosis (organism load) may be performed. Microbiological assessment 48 hours to 7 days after the completion of therapy is paramount for determining final outcome.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of diarrhea caused by Cryptosporidium. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Cryptosporidium is a coccidian protozoan that produces symptoms by infesting the small bowel. The illness is characterized by watery stools, anorexia, weight loss, and abdominal pain. Diagnosis is made by visualization of the organisms on microscopic examination of stool. There currently is no approved therapy for this infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design is recommended. Stratification of patients by age and immune status should be considered. Two stool samples obtained 48 hours to 7 days after completion of therapy should be negative for Cryptosporidium oocysts. Assessment of microbiological outcome is paramount.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of diarrhea caused by Entamoeba histolytica. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Entamoeba histolytica causes colonic infection that ranges from asymptomatic carriage to invasive disease with infection of extraintestinal organs, particularly the liver. The disease occurs in both sporadic and epidemic forms. Diagnosis requires visualization of trophozoites or cysts by microscopic examination of stool, colonic scrapings, or biopsy specimens. Patients with either asymptomatic or symptomatic disease may be eligible for clinical trials. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design is recommended for asymptomatic carriers and an active-concurrent-control study design for symptomatic patients. Final outcome should be assessed 48 hours to 7 days after completion of therapy. Assessment of microbiological outcome is paramount.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of chronic carriage of Salmonella. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

The chronic carriage of salmonellae is defined as the shedding of a Salmonella species for > or = 1 year, as documented by an initial positive culture of a stool sample obtained at least 1 month after resolution of the acute illness and repeated positive cultures for at least 1 year. Clinical trials of investigational anti-infective drugs for the treatment of the salmonella carrier state may be conducted with a placebo control or an active concurrent control. A crossover design also may be employed for establishing efficacy. Patients should generally receive therapy for at least 6 weeks. Outcome will be assessed only by microbiological criteria. Determination of the interval required for the suppression of salmonellae and follow-up for 6 months after completion of therapy are recommended.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of antibiotic-associated colitis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Colitis due to Clostridium difficile is diagnosed in 10%-15% of hospitalized patients who develop diarrhea after treatment with antimicrobial drugs. Diagnosis is based on the concurrence of diarrhea, one or more signs or symptoms of enteric intoxication, and stool from which toxigenic C. difficile is isolated or from which its toxins are identified. Clinical trials evaluating therapy may be placebo controlled (for mild disease) or concurrently controlled with an active drug. A randomized, double-blind study design is preferred. Outcome should be assessed by monitoring of the degree of inflammation of the bowel mucosa, the intensity and severity of diarrhea, the duration of illness, changes in stool form, and the eradication of C. difficile or its toxins from stool. Because C. difficile can be a component of the normal gastrointestinal flora, assessment of clinical outcome is paramount.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of gastritis and peptic ulcer disease associated with infection by Helicobacter pylori. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative, microaerophilic, spiral bacillus. Infection by this organism is currently believed to be the major cause of type B gastritis. Inflammation and infection may persist for years in the absence of therapeutic intervention. There is currently no approved antimicrobial therapy for gastritis. Clinical investigations have shown that combination regimens including bismuth salts and antimicrobial drugs result in the relief of symptoms, the resolution of histologic evidence of gastritis, the eradication of H. pylori, high rates of ulcer healing, and lower rates of ulcer relapse than have been found with other therapies (antacids and H2 antagonists). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design is recommended for evaluation of new therapies. Study participants should have their progress monitored by endoscopy performed at enrollment, at completion of therapy, and 3 months thereafter. Assessment of microbiological outcome is paramount for final evaluation of the patient.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new antifungal drugs for the treatment of systemic fungal infections. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

These guidelines are applicable to all fungal pathogens that produce systemic infections in humans. Specific examples are provided whenever they might clarify special issues. Systemic fungal infections usually are divided into two broad categories: endemic systemic fungal diseases, which occur classically in healthy hosts, and opportunistic fungal diseases, which occur almost exclusively in patients with impaired host defenses. Both the increasing frequency of disseminated histoplasmosis and coccidioidomycosis in patients with AIDS and the occurrence of candidemia due to vascular-line infections have begun to blur this distinction. The fungi included in these guidelines are Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergillus species, and Sporothrix schenckii. Diagnosis of infections caused by these fungi should be based on culture of infected body fluids or tissues whenever possible. Cryptococcal and coccidioidal meningitis are exceptions. Amphotericin B remains the standard comparative agent for most new agents. Further studies of the efficacy of new oral agents used alone or after a hospital course of amphotericin B are needed. The agents currently available are usually inadequate for eradication of fungal infections in patients with AIDS, who may need prolonged treatment. Final assessment for these patients may need to be classified as clinical cure with presumed microbiologic persistence.

Antifungal Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment and prevention of tuberculosis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

This guideline addresses the evaluation of new antimycobacterial drugs in the treatment and prevention (secondary prophylaxis) of infection by M. tuberculosis. Patients may be enrolled in clinical trials on the basis of clinical and/or microbiological criteria. A therapeutic regimen will likely include a combination of drugs; a randomized, active-control, comparative clinical trial is recommended. If appropriate samples can be obtained for culture during follow-up without placing the patient at unwarranted risk, the assessment of microbiological outcome is paramount. Prophylaxis will probably require a single drug, and a similar study design is preferred.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment and prevention of infections caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

The bacteria of the Mycobacterium avium complex are ubiquitous; thus it is often difficult to distinguish environmental contamination from colonization or infection. Patients with either pulmonary or disseminated infection may be enrolled in clinical trials. Disseminated disease occurs mostly in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. In general, a randomized, active-control, double-blinded clinical trial is preferred; there should at least be a blinded evaluator. With regard to immunosuppressed populations, new antimycobacterial drugs need to be evaluated not only for the treatment but also for the prevention of disease. For trials of prophylaxis a placebo-controlled design is ethical until a drug is proven effective; then the use of an active-control regimen is appropriate. Since no regimen has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment or prevention of disease caused by the M. avium complex, demonstration of the superiority of the study regimen to the control regimen should be the objective of the clinical trial.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of disease caused by Mycobacterium kansasii and other mycobacteria. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Mycobacterium kansasii is a photochromogenic nontuberculous mycobacterium that usually causes infections of the respiratory tract in humans. Although spontaneous resolution of infection has been reported, most patients require antimycobacterial therapy. A three- or four-drug combination--isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol and/or streptomycin--usually is prescribed. For evaluation of a new drug, a randomized, double-blind or evaluator-blinded, active-control comparative study design is recommended. Treatment should continue for 18-24 months, and follow-up evaluations should be conducted every 6 months for 3 years. Microbiological outcome is paramount.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for surgical prophylaxis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

It has been established by substantial research that antimicrobial prophylaxis for various surgical procedures can reduce the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. When the incidence of infectious complications is high, the reduction with prophylaxis is most dramatic. However, even for many "clean" procedures (vascular procedures, total joint replacement), the small reduction in potentially calamitous complications justifies the use of prophylaxis. Many issues of detail remain unanswered: timing and duration of administration of antimicrobial drug; type of drug; use of topical anti-infective agents as ancillary measures; and choices for high-risk individuals and others ordinarily excluded from clinical trials. An approach to the conduct of clinical trials of anti-infective drugs for surgical prophylaxis is provided. Both general guidelines and specific recommendations for total hip replacement, colorectal operations, appendectomy, and transurethral resection of the prostate are included.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of intraabdominal infections. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

These guidelines deal with the evaluation of anti-infective drugs for the treatment of intraabdominal infections. The clinical entities consist of infections arising from any part of the gastrointestinal tract, from the distal esophagus to the colon. These include surgical infections of the bowel, biliary tree, liver, spleen, and pancreas. Virtually all intraabdominal infections are due to multiple microorganisms resident in the gastrointestinal tract; these include aerobes and facultative and obligate anaerobes. Infections are classified as complicated (requiring an operative procedure), uncomplicated (managed medically), and postoperative wound (the operative procedure should be curative, but anti-infective drugs are used to prevent further infection at the site). Clinical criteria are paramount for entry into a study and for evaluation of efficacy. For complicated infections an adequate operation is an important determinant of outcome and needs assessment. Cultures of purulent intraabdominal fluid or abscess material are the only valid microbiologic indicators of infection. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score is useful in defining the severity of acute illness. The control regimen should consist of effective, established drugs and surgical procedures for the condition. Duration of therapy for complicated infections is usually 5-14 days; for uncomplicated infections, 3-7 days; and for postoperative wound infection, 2-5 days. Periodic assessment of safety and efficacy must be conducted during therapy. The outcome at final assessment is cure, failure, or indeterminate.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of acute pelvic infections in hospitalized women. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

This set of guidelines deals with evaluation of anti-infective drugs for treatment of acute pelvic infections in hospitalized women. The clinical entities include infectious complications of cesarean section; elective hysterectomy; and septic, incomplete abortion. Conditions including endomyometritis, cuff cellulitis, pelvic cellulitis, parametritis, phlegmon, and pelvic abscesses may arise due to a variety of bacterial species, both aerobic and anaerobic, that comprise the endogenous flora of the lower reproductive tract. Anaerobic bacteria have assumed particular importance, and therapy should be directed against such organisms. The roles of enterococci, chlamydiae, and mycoplasmas remain uncertain. Culture samples must be obtained under conditions assuring minimal vaginal contamination. Before a new drug may be used for treatment of human pelvic infections, considerable information is necessary about its antimicrobial spectrum as well as its safety and efficacy. Placebo-controlled trials are considered unethical. Historical controls may be used, but concurrent active control comparative trials are preferred. Parenteral administration is recommended for at least the initial 4 days of therapy, but orally administered drugs may be evaluated for completion of longer courses. The expected cure rate is approximately 90%. Uncomplicated infections should be treated for at least 4 days; more complicated infections may require prolonged therapy. Although clinical cure is paramount, microbiologic response must also be taken into account. In the final assessment, outcome will be classified as cure, failure, or indeterminate.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a syndrome unrelated to pregnancy or surgery and characterized by lower abdominal pain and tenderness, cervical motion tenderness, and adnexal tenderness. Fever, leukocytosis, and the results of laboratory tests are used to support the diagnosis. Participants in clinical trials should be stratified into two groups: those with and those without tubo-ovarian abscess--i.e., those with complicated and those with uncomplicated PID. Diagnostic studies and treatment should be directed at four major groups of pathogens: Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, anaerobic bacteria, and facultative bacteria such as Escherichia coli. Women requiring hospitalization should generally be treated as inpatients for at least 4-7 days; outpatient therapy should then be instituted to complete a 14- to 21-day course. Clinical and laboratory evaluations should be conducted daily during hospitalization and both 2-4 days and 2-4 weeks after the completion of therapy.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

These guidelines deal with the evaluation of anti-infective drugs for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Five clinical entities are described: streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis, otitis media, sinusitis, bronchitis, and pneumonia. A wide variety of microorganisms are potentially pathogenetic in these diseases; these guidelines focus on the bacterial infections. Inclusion of a patient in a trial of a new drug is based on the clinical entity, with the requirement that a reasonable attempt will be made to establish a specific microbial etiology. Microbiologic evaluation of efficacy requires isolation of the pathogen and testing for in vitro susceptibility. Alternatively, surrogate markers may be used to identify the etiologic agent. The efficacy of new drugs is evaluated with reference to anticipated response rates. Establishment of the microbial etiology of respiratory tract infections is hampered by the presence of "normal flora" of the nose, mouth, and pharynx, which may include asymptomatic carriage of potential pathogens. This issue is addressed for each category of infection described. For example, it is suggested that for initial phase 2 trials of acute otitis media and acute sinusitis tympanocentesis or direct sinus puncture be used to collect exudate for culture. Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis also present difficulties in the establishment of microbial etiology. These guidelines suggest that clinical trials employ an active control drug but leave open the possibility of a placebo-controlled trial. For pneumonia, the guidelines suggest the identification and enrollment of patients by the clinical type of pneumonia, e.g., atypical pneumonia or acute bacterial pneumonia, rather than by etiologic organism or according to whether it was community or hospital acquired. For each respiratory infection, the clinical response is judged as cure, failure, or indeterminate. Clinical improvement is not acceptable unless quantitative response measures can be applied.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of infective endocarditis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

These guidelines describe the design and implementation of clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of anti-infective drugs for the treatment of infective endocarditis. Identification and enrollment of patients in clinical trials is based on a modification of traditional criteria. To accrue a sufficient number of patients, only those with streptococcal or staphylococcal endocarditis should be included in studies. Results of treatment with approved drugs allow for projection of expected bacteriologic cure rates and survival rates. Prospective randomized, double-blind studies are recommended. These guidelines are based on the premise that future protocols may include shorter courses of therapy, combinations of drugs, or progression from parenteral to oral therapy. Clinical response is judged as cure, failure, or indeterminate; there is no "improved" category. Microbiologic response is categorized as eradication, persistence, or relapse. When a patient has shown no clinical evidence of active disease for a protracted period, there may be no need to perform a posttreatment blood culture; for such patients, the microbiologic response is termed presumptive eradication. Several months of follow-up may be necessary to detect late relapses.

Anti-Infective Agents↗