PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

Screening for cystic fibrosis carrier state.

Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis as part of reproductive health care, including prenatal care, is not the standard of practice at this time. However, a recent National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference recommended that cystic fibrosis carrier screening should be offered to adults with a family history of cystic fibrosis, partners of individuals with cystic fibrosis, couples planning a pregnancy, and couples seeking prenatal testing. A workshop convened to discuss the implementation of these recommendations concluded that several issues must be resolved before these recommendations can be implemented. This commentary reviews the discussions that occurred and the conclusions that were reached at this workshop. Some of the subjects considered by the workshop participants were: the goals and outcomes of carrier screening; the continuum from making a test available to offering that test; to whom, when, and how cystic fibrosis testing should be offered; laboratory practice and quality assurance; provider and patient education; and insurance issues. The workshop participants concluded that those populations to whom carrier screening should be offered might include individuals and couples in high-risk groups who seek preconception counseling, infertility care, or prenatal care. High-risk groups include individuals of white northern European or of Ashkenazi-Jewish descent, those whose partners have cystic fibrosis, and those with a family history of cystic fibrosis. Before screening can be offered systematically to these individuals or couples, practice guidelines, educational materials for providers and patients, informed-consent protocols, and laboratory standards for testing must be developed.

Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic↗

Prevention of recurrent nephrolithiasis.

The first episode of nephrolithiasis provides an opportunity to advise patients about measures for preventing future stones. Low fluid intake and excessive intake of protein, salt and oxalate are important modifiable risk factors for kidney stones. Calcium restriction is not useful and may potentiate osteoporosis. Diseases such as hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis and renal tubular acidosis should be considered in patients with nephrolithiasis. A 24-hour urine collection with measurement of the important analytes is usually reserved for use in patients with recurrent stone formation. In these patients, the major urinary risk factors include hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, hypocitraturia and hyperuricosuria. Effective preventive and treatment measures include thiazide therapy to lower the urinary calcium level, citrate supplementation to increase the urinary citrate level and, sometimes, allopurinol therapy to lower uric acid excretion. Uric acid stones are most often treated with citrate supplementation. Data now support the cost-effectiveness of evaluation and treatment of patients with recurrent stones.

Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic↗

An earful.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic↗

NIH report.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic↗

Guidelines and algorithms: perceptions of why and when they are successful and how to improve them.

Medicine is increasingly complex, a reality created by the explosion of knowledge during the last 50 years. The cost of applying this knowledge creates a daunting economic challenge. As a result, there has been a profusion of guidelines intended to influence medical practice. This report explores the interrelated issues and concepts that impact the value and success of guidelines. These include medical quality and error, compliance, and the impact on outcomes in an evidence-based medicine context. Lessons learned from previous guidelines must be understood in relation to human behavior. Legal implications of the guidelines must be considered because both an increase and a decrease in liability can be anticipated. Many products have been labeled "advocacy guidelines" with a negative context. They are believed to express motivation rather than optimizing care. The ideal of professionalism is challenged, and there is potential for the growing use of guidelines in enforcing punitive actions. Constructive experience has emphasized the appropriate required elements for practice guidelines: a systematic review of the literature, an assessment of the volume and level of the evidence, and development of a review process by an appropriate multidisciplinary group for consistency, clinical impact, and resource implications leading to clearly stated and reasonable recommendations. The dissemination of guidelines, beyond conventional publication in a journal, will impact the success of the intended outcomes. The exploitation of electronic avenues, including the Internet and the evolving interactive electronic medical record, seems to be essential for future success in these endeavors.

Algorithms↗