SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Delphi”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Identification of relevant ICF categories for indication, intervention planning and evaluation of health resort programs: a Delphi exercise.

Health resort programs have a long tradition, mainly in European countries and Japan. They rely on local resources and the physical environment, physical medicine interventions and traditional medicine to optimise functioning and health. Arguably because of the long tradition, there is only a limited number of high-quality studies that examine the effectiveness of health resort programs. Specific challenges to the evaluation of health resort programs are to randomise the holistic approach with a varying number of specific interventions but also the reliance on the effect of the physical environment. Reference standards for the planning and reporting of health resort studies would be highly beneficial. With the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF), we now have such a standard that allows us to describe body functions and structures, activities and participation and interaction with environmental factors. A major challenge when applying the ICF in practice is its length. Therefore, the objective of this project was to identify the ICF categories most relevant for health resort programs. We conducted a consensus-building, three-round, e-mail survey using the Delphi technique. Based on the consensus of the experts, it was possible to come up with an ICF Core Set that can serve as reference standards for the indication, intervention planning and evaluation of health resort programs. This preliminary ICF Core Set should be tested in different regions and in subsets of health resort visitors with varying conditions.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2006

The future of imaging techniques for cancer patients in The Netherlands : A Delphi study.

There is a need in The Netherlands to understand the future prospects of imaging techniques in cancer care to deal with current and expected capacity decisions. For this, a Delphi research was performed with a panel of 35 noted experts. The panel anticipates that the application of imaging techniques (e.g., CT, MRI, PET) will gradually change; especially, their use will also include earlier stages, i.e., cancer screening and treatment. The increasing need and investments for these techniques will be partly balanced by new developments (e.g., faster technology). There will be a substantial decrease in the use of ultrasound, CT (except for screening), and conventional radiographic diagnostics. Radical new techniques and/or developments are not expected. The panel foresees increasing partial task substitution and subspecialization. Further, a profound impact on imaging techniques is expected from developments outside the imaging field such as digitalization, changing patient demands, and commercialization.

Biomedical Technology↗

PubMed1991

Changes: the Delphi technique adapted for classroom evaluation of clinical placements.

Too frequently during the post-allocation evaluation of clinical areas, some student psychiatric nurses displayed varying degrees of negativism towards or lack of involvement with the clinical area. The design of a classroom exercise 'Changes' was an attempt to overcome these undesirable features. The exercise was an adaptation of the Delphi technique and involved the student nurses in identifying changes that they would wish to make if returning to the clinical areas. Some simple manipulation of the ideas generated allowed a group consensus to be achieved. On closer inspection an additional interesting aspect of the suggestions was the large proportion of desirable changes that could be achieved with no financial implications. Alternatively changes in attitudes or work practices were implicated. Having achieved the original intention and moreover, generated suggestions for potential improvements it was decided to retain and repeat the exercise with future groups of student nurses. A similar pattern was obtained. Finally, the results were presented to representatives of the clinical areas and the technique along with facilitation time, offered to and accepted by ward managers as a means of quickly identifying ward team priorities, and generating ideas for improving their areas.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2005

A Delphi study of district nursing research priorities in Australia.

This study, using a Delphi approach, sought the opinion of a self-selected panel of 320 district nurses regarding research priorities for district nursing in Australia. Over three rounds of questionnaires, the 419 research clinical problem areas requiring research as suggested by the panel were each rated in importance by the panel and then ranked through analysis from high to low average rating scores, thereby, whittling down the list to the top 15% (68) research questions and to a final list of the top 10 research priorities overall. Research questions focusing on discharge planning are dominant in these top 10 priorities, with documentation issues the second most common focus. Other foci in the top 10 priorities are staffing, aged care, palliative care, and assessment. The organization-specific top 10 research priorities focus on wound care, funding, education, and communication issues. Additionally, the top 68 priorities, which are either finitely practice-based or contextual-issues research questions, were categorized into 20 themes. The results will hopefully lead to scarce human and financial resources being directed to practice-relevant research programs that will facilitate improved health for district nursing (primarily home-nursing) clients in Australia and elsewhere.

Australia↗

PubMed2005

The effect of scientific misconduct on the results of clinical trials: a Delphi survey.

OBJECTIVES: To discover what types of scientific misconduct are most likely to influence the results of a clinical trial. DESIGN: Delphi survey of expert opinion with three rounds of consultation. SETTING: Non-industry clinical trial "community". PARTICIPANTS: Experts identified from invitees to a previous MRC consultation on clinical trials. 32 out of the 40 experts approached agreed to participate. RESULTS: We identified thirteen forms of scientific misconduct for which there was majority agreement (>50%) that they would be likely or very likely to distort the results and majority agreement (>50%) that they would be likely or very likely to occur. Of these, the over-interpretation of 'significant' findings in small trials, selective reporting and inappropriate subgroup analyses were the main themes. CONCLUSIONS: According to this expert group, the most important forms of scientific misconduct in clinical trials are selective reporting and the opportunistic use of the play of chance. Data fabrication and falsification were not rated highly because it was considered that these were unlikely to occur. Registration and publication of detailed clinical trial protocols could make an important contribution to preventing scientific misconduct.

Bias↗

PubMed2006

Communication between CAM and mainstream medicine: Delphi panel perspectives.

Healthcare practitioners' models of health affect their patient interactions and services. We surveyed mainstream (MM), integrative (IM) and CAM providers to investigate their models of health. This study generated ideas for actions to improve MM/CAM communication based on survey findings. Through the Delphi technique, a panel of 14 MM, IM and CAM experts participated in two rounds of questioning regarding survey findings. MM panel members were less supportive of almost all suggestions for actions than IM and CAM members. Suggestions most likely to be implemented were enabling the patient to take an active role in care, establishing understanding between patient and practitioner of treatment and its goals, fostering patients' taking responsibility for their health and communicating about patient assessment in ways understandable to others. Actions to foster better MM/CAM communication promote focus by a team of providers on the patient's goals, functioning and involvement in their care.

Complementary Therapies↗

PubMed2004

The rational use of albumin in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. A Delphi study for the attainment of a consensus on prescribing standards.

BACKGROUND: Ascites is one of the most frequent severe complications in patients with liver cirrhosis. The treatment of this chronic disease usually requires the prolonged use of albumin, frequently continued even after patients' discharge from the hospital. AIMS: Aim of the study was to define a consensus among Italian physicians with regard to the use of albumin in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites. METHODS: The study adopted the Delphi technique to conduct the consensus activities. All controversial issues related to the use of albumin were identified by the experts' board and proposed to the 68 participating hepatology centres through two subsequent questionnaires. The questionnaires, returned by the specialists involved, were collected and the answers classified to verify the elements on which a consensus was reached. RESULTS: The home use of albumin can help to improve the patient's general conditions and well-being. About 77% of the experts involved considered likely that albumin administration could shorten hospital stays or could reduce the number of hospital admissions. The results of the study, along with a socioeconomic analysis, were presented to the Italian Drug Commission, which subsequently removed the specific hypoalbuminemia level as a prerequisite for having the drug reimbursed by the National Health Service. CONCLUSIONS: For an outpatient prescription, the hypoalbuminemia limit of 2.5 g/dl or less is not sufficient, while the decision whether to administer the drug requires the evaluation of patient's overall clinical conditions as an essential criterion for the prescription of a home treatment with albumin.

Albumins↗

PubMed2005

Community actions against alcohol drinking in Slovenia--a Delphi study.

AIM: To define the national strategy and public actions to reduce alcohol related harm, based on societal consensus. BACKGROUND: Alcohol abuse is an avoidable behaviour that can threaten health. In Slovenia, only a few public campaigns against drinking alcohol are under way. It is important to establish which community measures are acceptable to society in Slovenia in order to reduce alcohol-related risks. METHODS: A Delphi study with 45 professionals from different disciplines was conducted. Participants offered many suggestions to improve the current situation. After three rounds of questionnaires, 86 participant statements were accepted as a consensus. RESULTS: Actions such as: state monopolies, alcohol taxation, legislative restrictions on availability and purchase of alcohol, age-related restriction on sales, drink-driving laws, school-based alcohol education and media information campaigns are most likely to be achieved by consensus. The main target populations for implementation of alcohol-related educational programs are children, young people and employees. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of the study, a number of community actions against drinking alcohol that could be acceptable for society can now be suggested. They vary across different target populations, change agents (individuals, organizations and institutions) and methods of implementation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Healthcare providers' priorities for cancer care: A Delphi study in Greece.

Cancer is a major problem globally and effective cancer care services are needed to lessen its burden on the community. In Greece, oncology health services provision is not located efficiently, resulting in few patients receiving high-quality care. Furthermore, shortages of health professionals and underdeveloped services such as primary care, home care and palliative care have aggravated the problem. The absence of a national cancer registry means that the extent of cancer incidence cannot be evaluated effectively. Dissatisfaction with the Greek NHS is well established, despite the reforms proposed by consecutive Greek governments. It remains that limited research exists in the area of cancer services and cancer care. The aim of this study was to identify the key areas of cancer care and services that needed to be developed or improved in Greece and their prioritisation within the Greek healthcare system. A Delphi technique was used to collect data from a sample of 30 healthcare providers, in three rounds. The response rate for each round was over 77%. The priorities for healthcare providers were focused on staff shortages, working conditions, pain management, home care, day units and communication. Based on the priorities provided by the participants and supporting literature, it is suggested that a national cancer registry, the employment of nurses to develop primary care, home care, day care and palliative care services need to be established. Furthermore, education in communication skills and the redistribution of the bio-medical technology are needed in order to provide more effective cancer services in Greece. More research is needed to validate the actual level of cancer services provided in Greece.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2004

Equity in resource allocation in the Irish health service. A policy Delphi study.

Resource allocation in the Irish health service, based on historical allocations with incremental increases, is widely believed to be inequitable. Using a three-round policy Delphi survey, which seeks to explore both consensus and disagreement surrounding policy issues, the views of 52 senior health service personnel were sought in order to determine ways to improve equity in resource allocation. Panelists provided several reasons why the current method of resource allocation is inequitable and several suggestions for improving equity. The level of consensus on views was determined by calculating the percentage of ratings in each category based on a series of rating scales. The main suggestion centred around the development and implementation of a needs based resource allocation formula. Panelists reached a high consensus in favour of this but only reached a low consensus as to its feasibility. Potential obstacles identified included methodological difficulties, insufficient resources and resistance from potential losers. These findings highlight concerns about the lack of transparency in the resource allocation process and openness to the development of a more equitable needs based resource allocation model, a move which is becoming more common internationally. Feasibility concerns should not preclude an attempt to begin this process.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2004

Improving health care for adult survivors of childhood cancer: recommendations from a delphi panel of health policy experts.

OBJECTIVES: To identify barriers to, models of care for, and initiatives to improve health care of adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: Seventeen health care policy experts were asked to respond to the three objectives through a three-iterative Delphi process. RESULTS: Key barriers identified were that primary care physicians are unfamiliar with the health problems of survivors and survivors are often unaware of their risks. The recommended model of care would incorporate the chronic disease management model. Highest priority initiatives recommended were targeted education of primary care physicians and survivors, development and evaluation of standards of survivorship care, and a national web-based information center. CONCLUSIONS: The insights and recommendations of the panel provide a foundation intended to improve health care of cancer survivors.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis.

Consumer involvement in NHS research is Department of Health policy within the UK. Despite the existence of policy directives and guidance, until recently there has been no consensus among consumers and researchers about what it means to involve consumers successfully in NHS research. This paper discusses the value of consensus research in this policy area, and presents the detailed findings of a Delphi study carried out to reach consensus on principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. Study participants, comprising consumers, researchers and consumer-researchers, were identified using a purposive sampling strategy. Consensus was reached on eight clear and valid principles of successful consumer involvement in NHS research, with each principle having at least one clear and valid indicator. Subgroup analysis revealed few significant differences in how consumers, researchers and consumer-researchers rated the principles and indicators. The implications and limitations of the study are discussed. Further research is needed to assess: (1) the usefulness of the principles and indicators for differing models of consumer involvement, health research methodologies, and subject areas within health research; and (2) the impact of 'successful' consumer involvement on health research processes and outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The pitfalls of clinical case research: lessons from the Delphi Project.

Delphi is a project to make high-quality cases treated with homeopathy available for study. The project encountered a number of major difficulties including small numbers of cases submitted, ethical problems and problems of analysis. The nature of these problems and possible solutions are discussed.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2006

Identifying outcomes from the nursing outcomes classification as indicators of quality of care in Korea: a modified delphi study.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of patient outcomes as a measure of quality control of patient care is being adopted in Korean hospitals. Since nursing care contributes to the bulk of patient care, it is important to identify nursing-sensitive patient outcomes, hereafter referred to as 'nursing outcomes', that will be useful in the evaluation of nursing care. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to identify nursing outcomes included within the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) that are most sensitive for the evaluation of nursing care in Korean hospitals as well as being observable and measurable. DESIGN: Delphi technique modified for this study was used to gain a consensus from Korean nursing experts. SETTINGS: Participants were recruited from general hospitals in Korea. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty nurses working for Quality Improvement (QI) and Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) programmes were chosen as the nurse experts for this study. METHODS: Three rounds of data collection from all participants was undertaken. In the first data collection, the sensitivity of 260 NOC nursing outcomes (Johnson, et al., 2000. Iowa Outcomes Projects: Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). C.V. Mosby, St. Louis) was examined, and more highly nursing sensitive ones were selected. In the second and third data collection phases, nursing outcomes which are most useful for the evaluation of nursing care were selected. RESULTS: Vital Signs Status, Knowledge: Infection Control, Pain Control, Safety Behavior: Fall Prevention, and Infection Status were identified as the five most useful nursing outcomes for the evaluation of nursing care in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The nursing outcomes identified highly useful for the evaluation of nursing care in this study can be used effectively for the quality management of nursing care in Korea.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

ENA's Delphi study on national research priorities for emergency nurses in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: This study identified and prioritized research questions with greatest value to emergency nurses and of highest importance for health care consumers. METHODS: Three hundred twenty emergency nursing leaders were invited to participate in 3 rounds of mailed surveys aimed at developing consensus. During round I, 147 nurses submitted 456 research problems. These problems were synthesized into 154 researchable questions, encompassing 17 themes. The round II questionnaire listed these questions in random order. Respondents used a 7-point Likert scale to rate each question's value for practicing nurses and importance for health care consumers. One hundred one nurses rated 106 questions >5.0. The round III questionnaire was individualized to provide each respondent's round II score and each item's median group score. Reflecting on these data, subjects again rated the 106 questions. RESULTS: Seventy-nine nurses rated 16 questions 6.0 or greater for value for practicing nurses; 3 questions were rated 6.0 or greater for importance to consumers. Optimum staff to patient ratios, effects of mandatory overtime, holding admitted patients, and ED overcrowding, as well as effective strategies for educating and ensuring competence of nurses, were highest priority research problems for practicing nurses. Pain relief, impact of and methods of decreasing holding/lengthy ED stay, and effective strategies for patient teaching were judged most important for consumers. DISCUSSION: Nurses' concerns with staff shortages and overcrowding of emergency departments and their effects on patients are paramount. Pain management and patient education were chief clinical issues requiring research. The mission of ENA is "to provide visionary leadership for emergency nursing and emergency care." This mission encompasses a number of values, including the following: "The discipline of emergency nursing includes a defined and evolving body of knowledge based on research."(1) In 1998, the ENA appointed vision councils to develop futuristic ideas to advance ENA's mission. The Research Vision Council proposed that ENA develop a center for emergency nursing research to provide leadership and focus for scientific approaches to the many issues that concern emergency nurses and their patients. The Board of Directors supported this idea by formulating a work group to develop the National Institute for Emergency Nursing Research. In 1999, the work group proposed that a study be conducted to determine national priorities for emergency nursing research. This article reports on the methods and results of a Delphi study conducted for that purpose.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Experts' opinions on the role of liver biopsy in HCV infection: a Delphi survey by the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (A.I.G.O.).

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver biopsy represents the gold standard to establish a diagnosis in all liver patients, but its current position in chronic viral hepatitis is questioned. We aimed to create a consensus on best practice of use of liver biopsy in the management of chronic HCV infection. METHODS: We applied the Delphi method to 12 clinical scenarios of chronic HCV infection, to assess the extent of agreement (consensus measurement) and to resolve disagreement (consensus development) on the appropriateness of liver biopsy. RESULTS: Among 108 chosen hepatologists, 61 (56.5%) accepted to participate to the first-round survey. In four patients the majority of experts (from 61.4 to 86.2%) agreed not to perform liver biopsy; in two cases an equivalent opinion was found, and in the remaining six scenarios the majority of experts would have recommended a biopsy. No expert recommended liver biopsy in all cases, while most agreed for an histological evaluation of 4 to 8 cases. At the second round, 36 experts (59%) submitted ballots. Fifty-four out of 431 (12.6%) original judgments were changed with equal distribution among different scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey showed a great divergence of management of similar patients and should provide a stimulus for an evidence-based evaluation of liver histology in chronic HCV infection.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Midwifery's research heritage: A Delphi survey of midwife scholars.

A Delphi survey was conducted with midwife scholars to determine the top 10 midwifery studies worthy of recognition in 2005, the 50th anniversary of the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM). This survey was undertaken by students of Philadelphia University's Graduate Midwifery Program as a service-learning project on behalf of the ACNM Division of Research. Selected midwife scholars participated in 2 or 3 rounds of response and feedback to achieve consensus about research deemed historically or currently important to midwifery practice. The top 10 studies, as determined by the 19 participating midwife scholars, are presented here. These results are offered as reflection on research that has helped to shape and define the discipline of midwifery in the United States.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Determining criteria for excellence in nurse practitioner education: use of the Delphi Technique.

Standards and guidelines are available to help nurse practitioner (NP) educators maintain quality in their programs. NP education is now at a juncture to develop criteria that extend beyond the basic standards to measurement of exemplary educational endeavors. In 2000, the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties Task Force for Programs of Excellence was formed and given the charge of developing criteria for recognizing exemplary nurse practitioner programs. This article reports on results and recommendations that evolved from a Delphi study to identify a set of criteria for excellence in NP programs. Thirteen expert panelists from across the United States participated in three rounds of iterations to evaluate the relevance, specificity, and comprehensiveness of 14 initial criteria and reached consensus on nine final criteria. Finally, the paper discusses ways that these criteria may be used to improve NP education through the development of a program to recognize excellence in NP education.

Delphi Technique↗