PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Device Removal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of the delta copper T and the copper T 200 in Bologna, Italy.

An analysis is presented of a comparative study of the Delta T and Copper T 200 IUDs. A total of 195 postabortion insertions was performed between March 1981 and August 1982. All insertions were performed with an inserter. Primary bleeding/pain complaints after insertion were largely related to intermenstrual problems, with spotting the most frequently reported. Nine women had their devices removed for PID. One pregnancy occurred at ten months in the Delta T group. Both groups had one expulsion/displacement. Eight devices in each group were removed for bleeding/pain. Two women in the TCu group had their devices removed for personal reasons. The 6-months continuation rates for the two groups were 85.5 for the Delta T group and 82.2 for the TCu group. The 6-months follow-up rate for the Delta T group was 39.4 and 38.8 for the TCu group.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2002

A survey of methods used for post removal in specialist endodontic practice.

AIM: The aims of this study were to determine the attitudes of endodontists toward the risk of root fracture when removing posts and to determine which methods they commonly used to remove posts from root-filled teeth. METHODOLOGY: A survey was sent to all 74 members of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Endodontists. The survey was divided into three parts to gather information concerning root canal retreatment performed in specialist endodontic practice, attitudes about the risk of root fracture when removing posts and the methods used to remove different post systems. RESULTS: Responses were received from 62 (84%) of the Academy members. When a post was present in a tooth that required root canal retreatment, 66% of the endodontists preferred to remove the post, whilst 27% considered either post removal or periapical surgery. Forty-five per cent reported that a root fracture had occurred during post removal, but this represented less than 0.002% of the estimated number of posts removed by all respondents. Ultrasonic vibration was the most common method used to remove posts, although post removal devices were used more often in anterior teeth; the Eggler post remover was the most commonly used device. CONCLUSIONS: Most endodontists preferred to remove posts rather than perform periapical surgery. Few root fractures were reported. Ultrasonic vibration was the most common method used to remove posts from all tooth types, with the Eggler post remover used most commonly for posts in anterior teeth.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2005

Symptomatic cecal perforation by an intrauterine device with appendectomy removal.

BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device is the most used contraceptive in the world, but it is not without risk of perforation of intra-abdominal organs. We report a perforation of the cecum and removal via appendectomy. CASE: A 23-year-old woman developed chronic abdominal pain after insertion of an intrauterine device 8 weeks postpartum. At laparoscopy, the device was found in the cecum and removed via appendectomy. CONCLUSION: Perforation is more common in the immediate postpartum state. An alternate method of removal via appendectomy proved useful.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1982

Intrauterine devices: insertion and removal: practical procedures.

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) remain a popular and common method of contraception in Australia. Their insertion and removal are commonplace in general practice. Dr Ken Waldron believes the success of the IUD depends, in part, on observing correct insertion techniques.

Female↗