PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Local Lymph Node Assay”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

An alternative strategy to the use of guinea pigs for the identification of skin sensitization hazard.

For over half a century, guinea pig methods have dominated the field of toxicology concerned with the identification of skin sensitizers. Specific protocols, for example the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT), have been pre-eminent in the identification of skin sensitization hazard for regulatory purposes. However, there are increasingly several forces driving change, not least animal use/welfare considerations. In response to this and to address the need for a rapid screen for chemical allergens, an alternative strategy has been developed. In the first instance, a chemical is assessed by a computer-based expert system. This system is constructed from some 50 rules describing the key chemically reactive substructures of known skin sensitizers. The output from the expert system is also evaluated in the light of the understanding of the skin penetration characteristics of the chemical. In this way, and without use of animals, the likelihood that a chemical represents a skin sensitization hazard is assessed based on the two key characteristics of a skin sensitizer: (1) its direct or indirect ability to react with skin protein (i.e. does it contain a structural alert?); and (2) the ability of the chemical to partition into the appropriate epidermal compartment. When the chemical does possess a structural alert and has the capacity to penetrate skin sufficiently, then it may be regarded as a potential skin sensitizer. Subsequent to this screening phase, if necessary the chemical may be assessed in the murine local lymph node assay. This assay is quicker and cheaper than traditional guinea pig assays and importantly is less stressful to the fewer animals that it requires. The assay is well validated and produces objective results which are equivalent to the GPMT in terms of identifying significant skin sensitization hazard. In this paper, the above strategy is described in more detail, focusing on its relevance to hazard identification and its value in animal welfare terms. It is concluded that the strategy provides an important opportunity for both substantial reduction and refinement of animal use in a manner which will not compromise the existing standard of classification and labelling of skin sensitization hazard in the European Union.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

Experimental assessment of the sensitizing properties of formaldehyde.

Formaldehyde causes upper respiratory tract irritation and has been reported in some investigations to be a cause of occupational allergic asthma. The data are equivocal, however, and it has proved difficult to confirm that exposure to formaldehyde induces respiratory sensitization or provokes the production of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody. In this study the sensitizing properties of formaldehyde were examined experimentally. This chemical elicited strong positive responses in three independent methods for the prospective identification of contact sensitizing chemicals-the guinea pig maximization test, the occluded patch test of Buehler and the murine local lymph node assay. In contrast, in a novel predictive test method for assessment of respiratory sensitization potential-the mouse IgE test-formaldehyde at the same test concentrations was negative. Furthermore, formaldehyde induced in mice a pattern of cytokine secretion by draining lymph node cells inconsistent with the stimulation of IgE antibody responses or respiratory sensitization. These data indicate that, although formaldehyde is a potent contact allergen, it lacks a significant potential to cause sensitization of the respiratory tract.

Administration, Topical↗

The mouse ear swelling test (MEST) in the 1990s.

The mouse ear swelling test (MEST) was developed in the early 1980s to provide a lower cost, shorter and objectively graded alternative to the existing guinea pig based tests for delayed contact hypersensitivity. In the ensuing time, the test design has been modified and its use has been extended to additional applications (phototoxicity and photosensitisation screening and as a mechanistic tool in studying tumor promoting agents) and to evaluating a broader range of test materials (treated fabrics, medical devices, environmental pollutants, specialty chemicals, drugs, etc.) in the hands of new investigators. Likewise, other murine based tests have been developed. The MEST and one other murine test (the local lymph node assay, or LLNA) have also now been included in the lists of regulatorily accepted sensitization test systems. The current version of the MEST protocol is presented here, along with the rationale for changes, a review of evaluations and interlaboratory trials and an overview of the range of uses to which it has been applied.

Allergens↗

Classification of chemicals as sensitisers based on new test methods.

For the last decade, classification schemes worldwide have recognised that certain chemicals may need to be categorised as skin or respiratory sensitisers. Although differing in detail, the schemes use similar criteria for designating materials as sensitisers, based on either direct evidence from exposed humans or the results of predictive guinea pig tests. In the case of respiratory sensitisation, however, there are currently no acceptable animal test methods. With an increasing understanding of cellular immunology in general, and of immune responses in skin and respiratory sensitisation in particular, several laboratories have recently been developing more objective, immunologically-based tests. For skin sensitisation, the two most promising methods are the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the mouse ear swelling test (MEST). Both assays have undergone inter-laboratory validation and it has been shown that they are able to detect reliably moderate to strong sensitisers. The 1992 update of the OECD test guideline for skin sensitisation suggests the use of the LLNA or MEST as a first stage of testing; if a positive result is seen in either assay, a chemical may then be designated (and classified) as a potential sensitiser and it may not be necessary to conduct a guinea pig test. However, if a negative result is obtained, a guinea pig test must be performed. For respiratory sensitisation, although certain guinea pig models of asthma appear to be predictive of the known human response to sensitisers such as diisocyanates and acid anhydrides, the measurement of changes in serum IgE antibodies in mice treated topically with chemicals may represent a simpler and more accurate method of designating chemicals as respiratory sensitisers.

Allergens↗

Approaches to the identification and classification of chemical allergens in mice.

During the last 10 years understanding of the immunobiological mechanisms whereby chemicals induce allergy has increased significantly. In parallel there have emerged opportunities to develop alternative methods for the prospective identification and classification of chemical contact and respiratory allergens. Attention has focused largely on the mouse, and several novel approaches to the identification of contact allergens have been described, among them the local lymph node assay, the mouse ear swelling test and, most recently, the noninvasive mouse ear swelling assay (MESA). Progress has been made also in defining methods for measuring respiratory sensitization potential in mice. Recent evidence indicates that respiratory and contact allergens provoke qualitatively different immune responses characteristic of selective T helper (Th) cell activation. Evaluation of the nature of immune responses induced in mice by chemicals may permit not only assessment of allergenic potential, but also prediction of the form allergic reactions will take.

Allergens↗

The fragrance chemical beta-caryophyllene-air oxidation and skin sensitization.

Fragrances are common causes of allergic contact dermatitis. beta-Caryophyllene is a sesquiterpene that is used as a fragrance chemical. Analogous to the monoterpenes R-limonene and linalool, it can be expected to autoxidize when air exposed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the autoxidation of beta-caryophyllene and to evaluate the effect on the contact allergenic activity. beta-Caryophyllene started to oxidize immediately when air exposed and after 5 weeks almost 50% of the original compound was consumed. Caryophyllene oxide was found to be the major oxidation product. Hydroperoxides of beta-caryophyllene could not be detected in the oxidation mixture. Caryophyllene oxide was shown to be an allergen of moderate strength and beta-caryophyllene air exposed for 10 weeks showed a weak sensitizing capacity in the local lymph node assay. The study reveals that the allergenic activity of beta-caryophyllene is affected by autoxidation, but to a lesser extent when compared to R-limonene and linalool. The present findings support our results in clinical studies showing oxidized beta-caryophyllene to be a rather rare sensitizer compared to oxidized R-limonene and linalool.

Air↗

Evaluation of phototoxic and photoallergic potentials of 13 compounds by different in vitro and in vivo methods.

Phototoxic side effects of pharmaceutical and cosmetic products are of increasing concern for patients, dermatologists and the chemical industry. Moreover, the need of new chemicals and drugs puts pressure on pre-clinical test methods for side effects, especially interactive adverse-effects with UV-light. So, the predictive potential of different established test methods, which are used regularly in our departments in order to detect the phototoxic potential of chemicals, were analyzed. Namely the fibroblast 3T3 test, the photo hen's egg test, a guinea pig test for measuring acute photoreactions, and a modified Local Lymph Node Assay, the Integrated Model for the Differentiation of Skin Reactions. Various agents with different photoreactive potential were tested: quinolones like Bay y 3118, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, lomefloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, as well as promethazine, chlorpromazine, 8-methoxypsoralen and olaquindox serving as control. Special emphasis was taken to evaluate the capability of the employed test procedures to predict phototoxic side effects in patients. Following our results, both in vitro assays were useful tools to detect photoirritancy while the photoallergic potentials of tested compounds were exclusively detected by an in vivo assay. As long as no in vitro model for photoallergy is available, the UV-IMDS should be considered to evaluate photoallergic properties of a supposed photoreactive agent.

Animals↗

In vitro assessment of sensitizing activity of low molecular weight compounds.

Predictive tests to identify the sensitizing properties of chemicals are carried out using animals. There is as yet, no accepted in vitro method for the identification of skin sensitizing chemicals. Such in vitro tests should encompass (parts of) the sensitization phase of contact hypersensitivity. Two cell types are predominantly involved in this process, keratinocytes (KC) and Langerhans cells, the latter being a specialized type of skin dendritic cells (DC). Low molecular weight chemicals act as haptens; KC respond to allergen contact by, among others, producing proinflammatory cytokines, while DC take up the haptenized protein, migrate, and present antigen to T-cells. During migration, DC mature, resulting in a loss of antigen uptake capacity, thereby increasing expression of certain surface molecules. Thus, both cytokine production by KC and surface marker expression by DC may be used as in vitro models for the identification of sensitizers. Several reports have shown that intracellular IL-1 alpha is a promising candidate to identify sensitizers using KC. We have recently shown that the potency of sensitizers may be determined by dose-response analysis of intracellular IL-1 alpha and IL-18 using a murine KC cell line. The ranking of potency using this in vitro method was similar to the ranking previously established using the local lymph node assay. Using DC, effects on the expression of various cell surface markers, cytokines, and molecules involved in antigen uptake have been shown to identify sensitizers. One study showed that also the potency of sensitizers may be determined using DC. Additional studies are required to establish whether KC or DC, or combinations thereof, are most suitable for in vitro identification and potency assessment of sensitizers.

Animals↗

The cytokine-dependent MUTZ-3 cell line as an in vitro model for the screening of contact sensitizers.

Langerhans cells (LC) are key mediators of contact allergenicity in the skin. However, no in vitro methods exist which are based on the activation process of LC to predict the sensitization potential of chemicals. In this study, we have evaluated the performances of MUTZ-3, a cytokine-dependent human monocytic cell line, in its response to sensitizers. First, we compared undifferentiated MUTZ-3 cells with several standard human cells such as THP-1, KG-1, HL-60, K-562, and U-937 in their response to the strong sensitizer DNCB and the irritant SDS by monitoring the expression levels of HLA-DR, CD54, and CD86 by flow cytometry. Only MUTZ-3 and THP-1 cells show a strong and specific response to sensitizer, while other cell lines showed very variable responses. Then, we tested MUTZ-3 cells against a wider panel of sensitizers and irritants on a broader spectrum of cell surface markers (HLA-DR, CD40, CD54, CD80, CD86, B7-H1, B7-H2, B7-DC). Of these markers, CD86 proved to be the most reliable since it detected all sensitizers, including benzocaine, a classical false negative in local lymph node assay (LLNA) but not irritants. We confirmed the MUTZ-3 response to DNCB by real-time PCR analysis. Taken together, our data suggest that undifferentiated MUTZ-3 cells may represent a valuable in vitro model for the screening of potential sensitizers.

Adult↗

Assessment of contact allergens by dissociation of irritant and sensitizing properties.

The human organotypic skin explant culture (hOSEC) model is a promising alternative in vitro model for screening contact allergens. In this model, the chemical-induced migration of Langerhans cells (LCs) out of the epidermis, evaluated after a 24-h exposure period, is used as a measure of sensitizer potential. As skin irritants can also induce LC migration it is essential that concentrations of test chemicals are used that are not even weakly irritant. Using the hOSEC irritation model chemicals are classified as weak irritants if they are toxic after a 48-h exposure period. Toxicity is determined by methyl green-pyronine (MGP) staining of hOSEC. We studied three frequently used non-sensitizing skin irritants and six potent or frequent human sensitizers in a dose-response. A complete discrimination between non-sensitizers and contact sensitizers was obtained for the chemicals tested when the concentrations used were lower than the weak irritant concentrations. Frequency of positive allergen reactions in patch test of human populations correlated with the difference between weak irritant concentrations and the lowest concentration inducing significant LC migration. Sensitizer potency correlated with chemical irritancy as determined by keratinocyte death. For the compounds tested, the hOSEC model predicted allergenicity in humans better than the guinea pig maximization test and the mouse local lymph node assay.

Allergens↗

Sensitization potential of gold sodium thiosulfate in mice and guinea pigs.

Since gold sodium thiosulfate (GST) has been included in a standard patch test series for diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis from gold, the incidence of patients showing positive reactions to gold is increasing. However, there were little reports on induction of gold sensitization in animals. In this study, we have examined the sensitization potential of GST using mice and guinea pigs. In the guinea pig maximization test, 2 or 6 out of 10 animals showed positive skin responses, mainly edema, by challenge with 2% or 5% GST in 50% ethanol solution, respectively. In the mouse ear swelling test, positive ear swelling (20% greater increase in ear thickness) after challenge with GST was shown in 2 out of 6 mice those previously treated with GST. Topical exposure of mice to GST in 70% dimethylsulfoxide solution induced small increases in the lymph node weight and the lymph node cell (LNC) number in the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). A greater degree of LNC responses were observed in the sensitive mouse lymph node assay (SLNA) compared with the LLNA, but the stimulation index of total lymph node response by GST was not so high. From these results, GST was identified as a contact allergen, but the sensitization potential was not so strong. In the mouse IgE test, treatment of mice with GST resulted in a statistically significant increase in the serum IgE antibody concentration that associated with immediate-type hypersensitivity reaction. It may suggest that the sensitization responses from gold would appear not only at the contact site but also systematically.

Animals↗

Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests.

It is important that predictive toxicological test methods are selective for their intended endpoint and that their limitations are understood and acknowledged. The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a relatively new predictive test for skin sensitization potential that can replace traditional guinea pig tests and offers significant scientific and animal welfare advantages. However, there has been some concern that certain irritant materials may yield false positive results, although it must be emphasized that false positives also occur in guinea pig methods. Consequently, we have examined the performance in the LLNA of a range of skin irritants, from varying chemical classes and covering a range of irritation potency. The results presented here demonstrate clearly that the majority of skin irritants are negative in the LLNA. These results are reviewed in the context of the occurrence of false positive reactions in the guinea pig maximization test and the strategies for dealing with such results are discussed. The need for careful scientific evaluation of the results in all predictive tests for sensitization is thus emphasized. In terms of specificity, the LLNA has been more fully evaluated than other predictive test methods and is at least as accurate. In terms of animal welfare, objectivity, reproducibility and reliability it is superior to other methods. In summary, all predictive skin sensitization test results should be evaluated in a scientifically rigorous manner and the additional data provided herein further support the adoption of the LLNA as a complete replacement for the traditional guinea pig methods.

Animals↗

Effect of prolonged exposure to low antigen concentration for sensitization.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is an assay in mice to identify potential allergens. Compounds that do not induce a stimulation index (SI)>or=3 are not considered sensitizers. Of the chemicals that do, the SI of 3 is used as a benchmark, and indicates the sensitizing potency of a chemical. Compared to the exposure duration of the LLNA (3 days), real life exposure often lasts for months or years. We therefore investigated whether prolonged exposure to sensitizers at concentrations that do not induce a SI>or=3 in the LLNA, were able to surpass this threshold. Mice were treated for 2 months at 7-day intervals with a range of concentrations of the known allergens ethyl-p-aminobenzoate (benzocaine, BENZ), 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), and tetramethyl thiuram disulfide (TMTD). Both proliferative activity and cytokine production were established at day 60. Neither BENZ nor TMTD showed a significant increase in the proliferation rate compared to vehicle controls. Only DNCB at concentrations originally above the EC(3) a significant increase in proliferation was seen after prolonged exposure. No significant effect on IFN-gamma and IL-4 production was observed for all three compounds compared. These findings indicate that for classification of sensitizers the shorter exposure period employed in the standard LLNA is sufficient, and longer periods of exposure have no bearing on this classification.

Allergens↗

From xenobiotic chemistry and metabolism to better prediction and risk assessment of skin allergy.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a condition that can have a serious impact on quality of life. The manifestation of ACD is dependent upon the primary sensitisation of an individual to a specific substance following skin exposure. It is important to identify and manage the risks associated with exposure to known skin sensitisers, in both the manufacture and use of consumer products. At present, the only validated approaches to conclusively identify sensitisation hazard and estimate potency are in vivo models such as the local lymph node assay. No in vitro test methods exist for this endpoint. There is an urgent need to develop novel in vitro/in silico testing or risk assessment strategies to replace animal testing. It is envisaged that such novel approaches can only be developed on the foundation of a good mechanistic understanding of skin sensitisation. Early stages of sensitisation are thought to be dependent upon the extent of compound absorption and bioavailability, rates of metabolic activation or detoxification and intrinsic reactivity of the bioavailable xenobiotic electrophile with skin protein nucleophiles. This review explores general chemical and metabolic aspects in relation to the potential formation of protein-hapten conjugates. Despite the complexities and poor understanding of some of the metabolic processes involved in skin sensitisation, it is possible to describe some of the relationships between chemical structures and the ability to form covalent conjugates with proteins. A prototypical group of xenobiotics that have been used to explore sensitisation mechanisms in some detail are selected cinnamic derivatives: a discussion of recent work using these compounds is presented as a case study. Novel aspects for future research in this area are also discussed.

Animals↗

Local lymph node activation and IgE responses in brown Norway and Wistar rats after dermal application of sensitizing and non-sensitizing chemicals.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the IgE test in the mouse are proposed models for predictive recognition of low molecular weight chemicals causing IgE-mediated allergic airway reactions in man. Since rats are commonly used in routine toxicity studies and a previous study (Arts et al. (1996) Food Chem. Toxicol. 34, 55-62) has shown that several rat strains were found appropriate for the LLNA, the suitability of the rat for the IgE test was examined in the present study. Serum IgE concentrations were examined following topical exposure of Brown Norway (BN) and Wistar rats to each of four chemicals with known diverse sensitization potential in humans: trimellitic anhydride (TMA), a dermal and respiratory sensitizer, dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), a dermal sensitizer with no or limited potential to cause respiratory allergy; formaldehyde (FA), a skin irritant and dermal sensitizer with equivocal evidence for respiratory sensitizing potential; methyl salicylate (MS), a skin irritant devoid of sensitizing properties. Of the four tested chemicals, only exposure to TMA resulted in a significant increase in serum IgE concentration and this response was only evoked in the high-IgE-responding BN rat. The latter two chemicals were also tested for lymph node activation, in casu the ear-draining lymph nodes. FA caused a dose-dependent activation of the draining lymph nodes whereas MS was inactive. The results as obtained with TMA, DNCB and MS in the rat are in agreement with human data. The results with FA though, indicate the need for further studies of chemicals that have both irritant and sensitizing properties at about similar concentrations or may act through non-IgE-mediated immune mechanisms.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

What are the prospects for regulation in immunotoxicology?

Evaluating the immunotoxic potential of investigational new drugs is a standard component of non-clinical safety assessment. Effects evaluated include the potential for drugs to induce hypersensitivity and/or autoimmune reactions or to produce unintended immunosuppression. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) is considering approaches for evaluating potential immunotoxicity. In particular, two methods are being examined for potential recommendation where indicated: immune cell phenotype determination and the murine local lymph node assay. Issues concerning immunotoxicology testing will be discussed.

Animals↗

A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.

INTRODUCTION: The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) was developed as an alternative to guinea pig models for the assessment of the xenobiotic contact sensitization potential. However, it would be advantageous to have an alternative endpoint to the usual radioisotopic-dependent measures. In the present study, we investigated the development of a nonradioisotopic endpoint for LLNA using immunohistochemistry. METHODS: Female Balb/c mice were treated by the topical application of strong sensitizers, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI), and a strong irritant, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), on the dorsum of both ears once daily for three consecutive days. The proliferation of cells in the auricular lymph node and ears was analyzed by means of the labeling index (LI) of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation into cells. RESULTS: Skin reactions, consisting of increased ear thickness and the presence of inflammatory cell infiltrates, were observed in mice treated with DNCB and TDI. The cell number and the weight of the lymph nodes in the mice treated with the allergens, DNCB and TDI, were increased compared to vehicle control. We observed an increase in the areas of the B220(+) cells in the lymph nodes of mice treated with allergens, as determined by immunohistochemistry. There was an increase in the percentage of B220(+) cells in mice treated with DNCB and TDI compared to the vehicle control, but not in those treated with SLS. Because we observed an increase in the percentage of B cells in the allergen-treated group, we measured the stimulation index (SI) in the cortex and medulla (C+M) of the lymph node. The SI values of the C+M in the lymph nodes of the mice treated with DNCB and TDI were increased more than threefold compared with that of the control. However, the SI of the C+M in the lymph nodes of the mice exposed to 25% SLS was not significantly increased compared to the vehicle control, although the lymph node weight of the SLS group was significantly increased. DISCUSSION: In Balb/c mice, BrdU immunohistochemistry showed its potential use for the identification and differentiation of chemicals with the capacity to induce irritation and sensitization. The results suggest that the measurement of the SI in the cortex and medulla of the lymph node using BrdU immunohistochemistry could provide a useful method to screen irritants and allergens.

Allergens↗

Quantum mechanical structure-activity relationship analyses for skin sensitization.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) results in inflammation of the skin due to sensitization of the immunologic system to a particular substance. The sensitization process is limited by the compound's ability to both permeate and react with proteins in the integumentary system. Currently, only in vivo animal tests such as the local lymph node assay (LLNA) are recognized by regulatory authorities for risk assessment of ACD. A quantitative structure-activity relationship has been developed to predict relative potency, which allows for the prediction of relative sensitization potentials. The experimental values used in this study include EC3 values (the concentration at which the stimulation index equals 3) from LLNA tests. The predictions in this model enable categorization of the compounds into three groups on the basis of risk of sensitization and enable screening of candidate molecules using rapid SAM1 semiempirical calculations prior to animal testing. The model may also be used to reduce the number of animals subjected to testing by providing estimated concentrations required for useful data of risk assessment. The effect of averaging available literature values on predictive ability is also investigated. The model includes halogenated compounds, aromatic compounds, alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones. The computational investigation resulted in a two-descriptor model that is consistent with the assumed mechanism for sensitization.

Hypersensitivity↗