PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ROOT CANAL THERAPY”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

A comparison between xeroradiographs and conventional radiographs as an aid in root canal therapy for maxillary molars.

The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of images obtained with dental xeroradiography to that obtained with conventional dental radiography during performance of root canal therapy on maxillary molars. For each step requiring radiographic information during endodontic treatment of 12 maxillary molars, a conventional radiograph and a xeroradiograph were made. This produced four pairs of images for each tooth treated as follows: (1) preoperative, (2) initial files for length determination, (3) master cones fitted, and (4) completed obturation of the root canal systems. The same x-ray machine was used as the source of radiation for all exposures with a setting of 70 kVp and 15 mA and with near identical projection for each pair of images achieved through use of a modified film holder and a custom positioning occlusal index made for each patient. Exposure time for the radiographs was 60 impulses (1 impulse = 1/60 second) and for the xeroradiographs it was 42 impulses. Images of structures and items important in endodontic diagnosis and treatment were rated as unacceptable (0), poor (1), adequate (2), or optimal (3) by four independent evaluators. Analysis of data showed the following: images of bone trabeculae, periodontal ligament spaces, root morphology, root apices, and fine bony abnormalities were judged to be significantly better in the radiographs than in the xeroradiographs (p less than 0.01) whereas there were no significant differences in image quality of pulp chamber morphology, root canal morphology, metallic measuring instruments, or endodontic filling materials.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Long-term outcomes of primary molar ferric sulfate pulpotomy and root canal therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of ferric sulfate pulpotomy (FS) and primary tooth root canal therapy (RCT) in vital pulps of deciduous molars exposed to caries lesions. METHODS: A total of 291 molars were treated in 130 children. One hundred and eighty-two molars received FS and 109 received RCT by random selection. RESULTS: At 3-year re-assessment, 29 molars (15 FS, 14 RCT) were available for clinical and radiographic examination. Two independent pediatric dentists evaluated periapical radiographs of the treated molars. Molars were classified 1 of 4 outcomes: (1) N = normal treated molar; (2) H = nonpathologic radiographic change present; (3) P(o) = pathologic change present, follow-up in 6 months; (4) P(x) = pathologic change present extract immediately. Survival analysis was applied. A good level of agreement between raters was found for molars with outcome P(x) (K = 0.79). No difference in radiographic outcomes was demonstrated 3 years after treatment (chi2 = 1.4). Survival analysis demonstrated a 3-year survival probability of 0.62 for FS-treated molars and 0.92 for RCT molars. Survival of RCT molars was significantly greater than for FS molars (Wilcoxon: P = .01; log-rank: P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: RCT-treated molars demonstrated significantly greater survival than FS-treated molars 3 years after treatment.

Child, Preschool↗