SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reasoning”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

A comparison of the moral reasoning of physicians and clinical medical ethicists.

BACKGROUND: Because of the increasing controversy over who should provide ethics consultations, this study investigated differences in the moral reasoning and moral orientations of physicians and clinical ethicists. METHOD: From 1987 through 1990, extensive interviews were conducted with 39 physicians and 50 clinical medical ethicists (26 philosophers and 24 theologians) who were at 32 medical centers in 14 states from all sections of the United States. The interviews were used to gather selected demographic characteristics (age, gender, and profession--physician or ethicist) for the 89 individuals as well as to determine their scores for moral reasoning and moral orientation. Polyserial correlations and multivariant analyses were then performed between the demographic characteristics and the data on moral reasoning and moral orientation. RESULTS: The physicians consistently scored lower than the clinical ethicists in their moral reasoning skills in terms of both moral stage score (p < .01) and weighted average score (p < .01). However, the physicians were found not to be significantly different (p < .05) from the clinical ethicists in their moral orientations toward justice or care in terms of recognition, predominance, or alignment. No significant relationship was found between age and moral orientation. A significant relationship was found between age and stage of moral reasoning, with the older individuals scoring higher. No significant relationship was found between gender and stage of moral reasoning. A significant relationship was found between gender and moral orientation: the women were more likely to recognize elements of care in moral dilemmas and the men more likely to recognize elements of justice. CONCLUSION: This study provides initial evidence that clinical medical ethicists, whether philosophers or theologians, may be better skilled than physicians to do ethicists consultations. To the extent that higher levels of moral reasoning correlate with superior skills in performing clinical ethics consultations, this study shows the value of bringing philosophers and theologians into the clinical setting.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Should moral reasoning serve as a criterion for student and resident selection?

The aim of medical school and residency training is to produce well-trained physicians. One problem has been in knowing which applicants to select. Academic criteria have not correlated well with clinical performance. The current study suggests consideration of an important variable that has been found to be associated with exemplary clinical performance. In recent studies a significant relationship between moral reasoning skills and clinical performance has been found for medical students and residents and dental and nursing students. A similar relationship has been found between levels of moral reasoning and malpractice claims among practicing orthopaedic surgeons. Rest has developed the Defining Issues Test, as a paper and pencil, objective test for assessing moral reasoning. With it being deemed appropriate to assess applicants' scientific reasoning, the authors support the development of an assessment of moral reasoning as a selection criterion for medical school and residency training. More research is required. If additional research confirms the relationship of moral reasoning and superior clinical performance, then the results of moral reasoning tests might legitimately be used in the selection process.

Humans↗

PubMed1998

Reasons for adolescent suicide attempts: associations with psychological functioning.

OBJECTIVE: To determine reasons for suicide attempts in adolescents and to examine the relationship between these reasons and psychological functioning. METHOD: Self-reported reasons for suicide attempts and psychological functioning were examined in 120 adolescent suicide attempters who presented to a pediatric general hospital. RESULTS: Consistent with prior research, the most frequently endorsed motives for self-harm were to die, to escape, and to obtain relief. More manipulative reasons for overdose (such as making people sorry) were endorsed less frequently. Adolescents who cited death as a reason for their suicide attempt reported more hopelessness, socially prescribed perfectionism, depression, and anger expression. Discriminant function analyses indicated that high levels of depression and anger expression predicted a self-reported wish to die, and high levels of depression and socially prescribed perfectionism predicted death as the primary reason reported for the suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic assessment of the reasons for a suicide attempt is a useful tool for clinicians in determining recommendations for follow-up treatment.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Factors associated with the failure of patients to complete cardiac rehabilitation for medical and nonmedical reasons.

PURPOSE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) provides effective secondary prevention services, but many patients fail to complete the recommended program. The purposes of this study were to describe completion rates in a hospital-based outpatient CR program, and to identify factors associated with patients failing to complete CR because of nonmedical and medical reasons. METHODS: Data used for the analyses were from a hospital-based CR program involving 526 discharged patients between January 1996 and February 2002. Patient discharge status was classified into three categories: complete, noncomplete-medical reasons, and noncomplete-nonmedical reasons. Logistic regression modeling identified factors associated with the groups failing to complete CR. RESULTS: The rate of CR completion was 58% (304/526). Among the 222 patients who did not complete CR, 139 (63%) had nonmedical reasons. As compared with the patients who completed CR, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for those who did not complete CR because of nonmedical reasons were more likely to be employed (AOR 2.2), to be obese (AOR 2.5), to be smokers (AOR 2.1), and to have shorter 6-minute walk distances (AOR 1.7). They were less likely to be women (AOR 0.6) or have diabetes (AOR 0.5). Patients not completing CR for medical reasons were more likely to be categorized as being at high clinical risk (AOR 4.2) and having shorter 6-minute walk distances (AOR 1.9). CONCLUSION: Except for low functional capacity, baseline factors associated with patients failing to complete CR differed on the basis of medical or nonmedical reasons. The development of interventions that address the special needs of patients with low functional capacity may be especially important in attempts to retain this high-risk group in CR therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Reasoning in believers in the paranormal.

Reasoning biases have been identified in deluded patients, delusion-prone individuals, and believers in the paranormal. This study examined content-specific reasoning and delusional ideation in believers in the paranormal. A total of 174 members of the Society for Psychical Research completed a delusional ideation questionnaire and a deductive reasoning task. The reasoning statements were manipulated for congruency with paranormal beliefs. As predicted, individuals who reported a strong belief in the paranormal made more errors and displayed more delusional ideation than skeptical individuals. However, no differences were found with statements that were congruent with their belief system, confirming the domain-specificity of reasoning. This reasoning bias was limited to people who reported a belief in, rather than experience of, paranormal phenomena. These results suggest that reasoning abnormalities may have a causal role in the formation of unusual beliefs. The dissociation between experiences and beliefs implies that such abnormalities operate at the evaluative, rather than the perceptual, stage of processing.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Consequentialism, reasons, value and justice.

Over the past 10 years, John Harris has made important contributions to thinking about distributive justice in health care. In his latest work, Harris controversially argues that clinicians should stop prioritising patients according to prognosis. He argues that the good or benefit of health care is providing each individual with an opportunity to live the best and longest life possible for him or her. I call this thesis, opportunism. For the purpose of distribution of resources in health care, Harris rejects welfarism (the thesis that the good of health care is well-being) and argues that utilitarianism in general may lead to de facto discrimination against groups of people needing health care. I argue that well-being is a superior theory of the good of health care to Harris' opportunism. Harris' concerns about utilitarianism can be better addressed by: (i) relating justice more closely to reasons for action; (ii) by conceptualising the relationship between reasons for action and the value of the consequences of those actions as a plateau rather than scalar relationship. Justice can be understood as satisfying as many equally rational claims on resources as possible. The rationality of a person's claim on health resources turns on the strength of that person's reasons to promote certain health-related states of affairs. I argue that the strength of that reason does not track the expected value of that state of affairs in a fully scalar fashion. Rather a person can have most reason to promote some state of affairs, even though he or she could promote other more valuable states of affairs. Thus there can be equal reason for a distributor of public resources to save either of two people, even though one will have a better and more valuable life. This approach, while addressing many of Harris' concerns about utilitarianism, does not imply that doctors should give up prioritising patients according to prognosis altogether, but it does allow that patients with lower but reasonable prognosis should have a share of public resources.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1990

Reasoning strategies and the use of biomedical knowledge by medical students.

This paper reports one of a series of studies conducted to investigate the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. It was motivated by findings from our earlier studies that demonstrate that when specific basic science information is provided to medical students prior to solving a clinical case, they are unable to use this information in explaining the patient problem. An experiment was designed to investigate the use of biomedical information in the explanation of a clinical problem without any basic science information (spontaneous explanation) and where basic science information was provided after the clinical case (biomedically primed explanation). The results are discussed in the context of a two-stage model of diagnostic reasoning. The first stage is referred to as data-driven reasoning, and is characterized by the triggering of inferences from observations in the data to hypotheses. The second stage is designated as predictive reasoning, and is characterized by the generation of inferences driven by hypotheses. The results show that, with the exception of final-year medical students, the use of biomedical information interfered with the data-driven reasoning process. However, it did facilitate the process of predictive reasoning by the students. It is proposed that a sound disease classification scheme is necessary before biomedical knowledge can facilitate both data-driven and predictive reasoning during clinical problem-solving.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2005

Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning?

PURPOSE: At the Faculty of Medicine at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, we have developed a final examination that consists of extended matching multiple-choice questions. Extended matching questions (EMQs) originate from a case and have 1 correct answer within a list of at least 7 alternatives. If EMQs assess clinical reasoning, we can assume there will be a difference between the ways students and experienced doctors solve the problems within the questions. This study compared students' and residents' processes of solving EMQs. METHODS: Twenty final year students and 20 fourth or fifth year residents specialising in internal medicine solved 20 EMQs aloud. All questions concerned diagnosis or pathogenesis. Ten EMQs related to internal medicine and 10 questions to other medical disciplines. The session was audio-taped and transcribed. RESULTS: The residents correctly answered significantly more questions concerning internal medicine than did the students. Their reasoning was more "forward" and less "backward". No difference between residents and students was found for the other questions. The residents scored better on internal medicine than on the other questions. They used more backward and less forward reasoning when solving the other questions than they did with the internal medicine questions. The better half of the respondents used significantly more forward and less backward reasoning than did the poorer half. CONCLUSION: In accordance with the literature, medical expertise was characterised by forward reasoning, whereas outside their area of expertise, the subjects switched over to backward reasoning. It is possible to assess processes of clinical reasoning using EMQs.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2006

Students' moral reasoning, Machiavellianism and socially desirable responding: implications for teaching ethics and research integrity.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between psychological constructs related to professional and research integrity and moral reasoning among medical students. METHODS: Medical students, 2nd-year (n = 208, 85.6% of 243 enrolled students), answered the moral reasoning test-defining issues test 2 (DIT2) and the Machiavellianism and Paulhus socially desirable responding (SDR) scales. RESULTS: Students had the highest score on the post-conventional schema of moral reasoning (mean +/- standard deviation, 35.2 +/- 11.6 of a possible 95) compared with personal interest (27.2 +/- 12.3) and maintaining norms schemae (29.2 +/- 11.5; P < 0.001, repeated-measures anova). Female students scored higher than their male collegues on post-conventional moral reasoning (37.6 +/- 11.0 versus 31.2 +/- 22.4, P < 0.001, independent-sample t-test). Of all 4 Machiavellianism subscales students scored highest on deceiving, where female students scored higher than their male colleagues (24.5 +/- 4.2 versus 22.9 +/- 5.1 of a possible 30; P = 0.037, independent-sample t-test). Female students also scored higher on the impression management subscale, whereas their male colleagues scored higher on the self-deception subscale of the Paulhus SDR scale. Moral reasoning scores were associated with cynicism, deceiving and flattering Machiavellianism scores, but not with Paulhus SDR scores. Multiple regression analysis showed the Machiavellianism amorality score as a significant negative predictor (beta = -0.183, P = 0.017) and female sex as a positive predictor (beta = 0.291, P < 0.001) for the post-conventional schema score on the DIT2. The Machiavellianism flattering score was a significant negative predictor for the personal interest schema score (beta = -0.215, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Although moral reasoning is generally seen as independent of variables related to personality, our study indicated that Machiavellianism, especially its amorality and flattering subscales, were associated with moral reasoning. These results have important implications for teaching ethics and the responsible conduct of research in different cultural and socio-economic settings.

Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗

PubMed1991

Primary reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Norway: changes from 1968 to 1988.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate time trends in primary reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Norway from 1968 to 1988. Johansen studied reasons for extraction of 8757 teeth in 4216 patients during a 3-week period in 1968. Twenty years later a random sample of 500 Norwegian dentists provided particulars about all extractions carried out during a 2-week period. 350 dentists (70%) replied in 1988 but 96 of them had not extracted any teeth during the observation period. Reasons for extraction of 985 teeth from 692 patients were available for analysis. Caries and its sequelae accounted for 35%, periodontitis for 19%, and orthodontic reasons for 20% of extractions in 1988. A comparison of the distribution of extraction according to reasons for patients over 20 yr of age revealed a highly significant difference between 1968 and 1988 (P less than 0.001) mainly due to a decrease in the role of caries and an increase in extractions for other reasons. Caries and its sequelae accounted for a higher proportion of extractions than periodontitis at all ages over 20 yr in 1968, only up to 45 yr of age in 1988. Thus it is concluded that the observed time trend in primary reasons for extraction corroborates expectations based on declining caries prevalence, increasing retention of teeth and a rise in dental attendance in Norway during the last 20 yr.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Japan.

Eight hundred forty-nine Japanese dentists were asked to record the reason for every tooth extraction of permanent teeth during 1 week in each of four seasons. The reasons were assigned to six groups: dental caries, periodontal disease, eruption problems, trauma, orthodontics and other reasons. Thirty-eight to 40% of the dentists returned the forms in each season, relating to a total of 11,175 extracted teeth. Overall, caries was the most frequent reason for tooth extraction (55.4%), followed by periodontal disease (38.0%). The females lost more teeth due to caries than did the males. In the > or = 16 age groups, caries was the main reason for tooth extraction. However, periodontal disease became principal only in the males aged 46-65 yr. Anterior teeth, especially in the mandible, represented the highest percentage of periodontal extractions. A considerable difference in the major reason for maxillary tooth loss was observed between both sexes. Maxillary premolars and molars in the males were extracted for periodontal disease as much as for caries, whereas caries was the predominant reason for loss of all maxillary teeth in the females.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1979

The reasons people give for taking overdoses: a further inquiry.

A representative sample of 41 cases of self-poisoning was studied in depth. In each case 'reasons' for taking the overdose, both stated spontaneously and chosen from a presented list, were recorded. The commonest spontaneous reason was the 'wish to die'. Nearly one-third indicated some non-suicidal purpose early in the interview and consistently denied suicidal intent subsequently. Apart from suicidal intent, reasons chosen from the list bore little resemblance to reasons that had been offered earlier in the interview and are therefore of uncertain relevance. Three psychiatric judges attributed reasons for each case based on common-sense criteria. Several reasons were seldom or never chosen by them; four were chosen frequently with good agreement, i.e. communicating hostility, influencing others, relieving a state of mind and suicidal intent. The first two were the most frequently chosen, attributed to 71 per cent and 54 per cent of cases respectively. They were the reasons chosen least frequently by the self-poisoners themselves. Of 23 (56 per cent) subjects indicating suicidal intent, 12 (29 per cent) were judged to be suicidal by psychiatrists. These were not clearly distinguishable on the basis of their original interviews, except that those judged suicidal tended to indicate suicidal intent early in the interviews. The clinical and research implications of these findings are discussed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Socioeconomic and sex differentials in reason for sickness absence from the Whitehall II Study.

OBJECTIVES: Large socioeconomic differences exist in disease and mortality. This paper describes the distribution of specific medical reasons for sickness absence by grade of employment in the Whitehall II study and validates the medical reason by comparison with general practitioners' records. METHODS: Analysis of sickness absence data on 5620 male and female civil servants aged 35-55 years. Data have been collected from 12 of the 20 London based civil service departments participating in the Whitehall II study, where medical reason for absence was available. Rates and distributions of reasons for absence for short spells (< or = 7 days) and long spells (> 7 days) were analysed. RESULTS: Respiratory disorders and gastroenteritis accounted for over half of all spells of absence, with headache and migraine, musculoskeletal disorders, injury, and neurosis accounting for a further 20%-30% of absences. There was an inverse association with employment grade, the lower the grade the higher the rate of absence for both short spells (< or = 7 days) and long spells (> 7 days). In general, women had higher rates of absence than men. Comparison of reason for very long spells of absence (> 21 days) showed moderate agreement between civil service and general practitioner. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of national comprehensive data on sickness absence and medical reason for absence, in particular for women and for spells of different duration. Data from the Whitehall II study show large employment grade and sex differences in the distribution of medical reasons for absence that are similar to socioeconomic differences in morbidity documented in other studies. Possible explanations include the subjective nature of illness and disease; the work/family interface; and the influence of the absence culture. Longer term follow up will provide information on whether sickness absence relates to serious morbidity and mortality.

Absenteeism↗

PubMed2006

Reasons for participation and non-participation in a randomized controlled trial: postal questionnaire surveys of women eligible for TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-Grade Abnormal smears).

BACKGROUND: Better understanding of motivators for, and barriers to, participation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in different study populations and settings has the potential to improve participation of historically under-represented groups (eg, women) in future trials. PURPOSE: To investigate reasons why women agreed, or declined, to participate in a RCT. METHODS: In two postal questionnaire-based studies, we investigated women's reasons for participation or non-participation in TOMBOLA, a RCT comparing management policies for low-grade cervical abnormalities. Four-hundred and ninety-two TOMBOLA participants (response rate 56%) completed questionnaires on reasons for participation. One-hundred and thiry-seven women (38%) who declined TOMBOLA participation completed questionnaires on reasons for this. RESULTS: Eighty percent of women reported that one of their reasons for attending their TOMBOLA recruitment appointment was worries about their smear result. Ninety-four percent participated in the RCT because it was a worthwhile contribution to the cervical screening programme and other women; for 70% this was the most important reason. These proportions did not vary by socio-demographic factors. Thirty-two percent thought participation would result in better care. The most common reason for non-participation was preference for follow-up from the woman's GP. Logistical issues (eg, inconvenient appointments, travel time, arranging time off work or child-care) were commonly cited. Fourteen percent were too frightened to participate; this was unrelated to the grade of the recruitment smear. LIMITATIONS: Response rates were not high, but there was little evidence of response bias. Structured questionnaires were used. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should address how best to deliver information to ensure different social groups appreciate potential benefits of RCT participation and provide reassurance regarding fears about participation. Simple strategies (eg, appealing to the altruism of potential participants or offering flexible recruitment clinic locations and times) might enhance RCT recruitment rates. This in turn would ensure best use of research resources thus bringing the greatest benefits to participants and the population.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Relationship between reason for placement and medical findings among children in foster care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reasons for placement of children in foster care, the prevalence of medical findings during initial placement, and the relationship between reason for placement and medical findings. The association between placement reasons and parental substance abuse also was explored. METHODS: Population-based analysis of medical records of 749 children examined at the Child Protection Center in San Francisco from October 1, 1991, to December 31, 1992. Health evaluations consisted of a clearance examination of children during entry into foster care and a comprehensive examination 3 weeks later. Reasons for foster placement included abandonment, neglect, no available caretaker, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and failed placement. RESULTS: Nearly 50% of children in our study were < 6 years of age. Neglect (30%), physical abuse (25%), and no available caretaker (24%) were the most frequent placement reasons, followed by abandonment (9%), failed placement (7%), and sexual abuse (5%). Substance abuse was documented in 30% of parents, 51% when the placement reason was neglect. Medical findings were identified in 60% of children. Among 0 to 6-year-olds, 27% had upper respiratory illnesses, 23% had developmental delay, and 21% had skin conditions; for children 7 to 12 years of age, 32% failed vision screening, 12% had dental caries, and 11% had upper respiratory illnesses; and among 13- to 18-year-olds, 31% failed vision screening and 12% had positive tuberculin skin tests. For younger children, skin conditions were associated with neglect, no available care taker, and failed placement, and developmental delay with neglect and abandonment. For adolescents, history of psychiatric illness was associated with neglect and failed placement. Marks of abuse for all age groups were limited to children who had been physically abused. Three or more diagnoses were identified for approximately 20% of children who had been neglected or abandoned or had failed placement, compared with 10% of children who had been either physically or sexually abused. CONCLUSIONS: Specific medical findings associated with reasons for placement provide health professionals with additional information to assess more accurately the health care needs of children entering foster care. As important, screening tests revealed high rates of vision problems and exposures to tuberculosis, warranting earlier and more comprehensive screening. Finally, children who have endured variations of neglect or failed placement may have more health problems than anticipated previously.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Associations of students' self-reports of their teachers' verbal aggression, intrinsic motivation, and perceptions of reasons for discipline in Greek physical education classes.

In this study were examined associations among physical education teachers' verbal aggressiveness as perceived by students and students' intrinsic motivation and reasons for discipline. The sample consisted of 265 Greek adolescent students who completed four questionnaires, the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale, the Lesson Satisfaction Scale, the Reasons for Discipline Scale, and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory during physical education classes. Analysis indicated significant positive correlations among students' perceptions of teachers' verbal aggressiveness with pressure/ tension, external reasons, introjected reasons, no reasons, and self-responsibility. Significant negative correlations were noted for students' perceptions of teachers' verbal aggression with lesson satisfaction, enjoyment/interest, competence, effort/importance, intrinsic reasons, and caring. Differences between the two sexes were observed in their perceptions of teachers' verbal aggressiveness, intrinsic motivation, and reasons for discipline. Findings and implications for teachers' type of communication were also discussed and suggestions for research made.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Reasons for contact in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study on content of practice.

To establish data on the patient's reasons for a contact, as a part of data on content of Icelandic family practice, a prospective practice audit was made of 16 Icelandic health centres with computerized contact data from 1 January to 31 December 1988. The study comprised 16 community health centres in Iceland and their target population, 12 rural and four urban. The reasons for contact in the study group are analysed. A total of 284348 reasons for contact were analysed; 36-39% were for symptoms and 44-50% were initiated by health professionals. The latter included renewal of prescriptions, which comprised 17-18% of all reasons for contact. Musculoskeletal symptoms were the most common symptomatic complaint, 6.6-7.3% of all reasons for contact. The five most often stated symptoms were: rash, cough, cold, lower limb symptoms, and fever. A "reason for contact" record increases the understanding of the patient's presenting complaint, as well as the patient's agenda in each contact. This record gives an opportunity to follow the presenting complaint in the continuous process of care i. e. reason for contact diagnosis, management, and follow-up. We are reminded that common things are common in family practice; nevertheless more research is needed to understand the process of care.

Community Health Centers↗

PubMed2001

Suppression of valid inferences and knowledge structures: the curious effect of producing alternative antecedents on reasoning with causal conditionals.

These studies looked at the difficulty that reasoners have in accepting conditional ("If P then Q") major premises that are not necessarily true empirically, as a basis for deductive reasoning. Preliminary results have shown that when reasoners are asked to produce possible alternate antecedents to the major premise ("If A then Q"), they paradoxically tend to deny the modus ponens (MP) inference ("If P is true, then Q is true"). Three studies further explored these results. The first study gave university students paper-and-pencil tests in which instructions to "suppose that the major premise is true" was followed by a request to determine the next number in a sequence, to retrieve information unrelated to the premises, or to retrieve a possible case of "If A then Q." Relative to a control group, reasoners asked to produce an alternative antecedent showed a significant tendency to deny the MP inference, whereas no such tendency was observed for the two other tasks used. A second study compared performance on a condition in which reasoners were asked to produce an alternative antecedent with that when they were given an explicit alternative. Premises used in this study were such that the latter alternative antecedent was also spontaneously produced by over 70% of reasoners. Results showed that the tendency to refuse the MP premise could not be accounted for by the specific nature of the alternative produced. A third study found that the tendency to refuse the MP inference after producing an alternative antecedent was affected by the number of "disabling conditions" (i.e., conditions that allow "P to be true" and "Q to be false") available for the major premise. These results are interpreted as being consistent with a model that supposes that logical reasoning requires selective inhibition of real-world knowledge.

Adult↗