PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reflex, Startle”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Sensitization of the acoustic startle reflex by footshock.

Administration of footshock (500-ms duration, 0.2-1.4 mA) increased the amplitude of the startle reflex for a long time after its presentation. The effect occurred with a single footshock, although its magnitude and consistency across animals was greater with 5 or 10 footshocks presented 1/s. The facilitatory effect came on within 2-4 min with a 0.6-mA shock, peaking in about 10 min and then dissipating over the next 40 min. Stronger shocks also increased startle, but with a more delayed onset of facilitation (8-10 min). Footshocks increased startle in rats not previously given startle-eliciting stimuli, indicating sensitization rather than dishabituation. The facilitatory effect may not be attributable to a rapid conditioning to the experimental context, because a change in lighting conditions from shock presentation to testing did not attenuate shock sensitization. This excitatory effect of shock on startle may represent the unconditioned effect of shock that can become associated with a neutral stimulus to support classical fear conditioning.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2002

The human startle reflex and alcohol cue reactivity: effects of early versus late abstinence.

This study investigated the human eyeblink startle reflex as a measure of alcohol cue reactivity. Alcohol-dependent participants early (n = 36) and late (n = 34) in abstinence received presentations of alcohol and water cues. Consistent with previous research, greater salivation and higher ratings of urge to drink occurred in response to the alcohol cues. Differential salivary and urge responding to alcohol versus water cues did not vary as a function of abstinence duration. Of special interest was the finding that startle response magnitudes were relatively elevated to alcohol cues, but only in individuals early in abstinence. Affective ratings of alcohol cues suggested that alcohol cues were perceived as aversive. Methodological and theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

On again, off again effects of gonadectomy on the acoustic startle reflex in adult male rats.

Numerous studies have shown sex and/or estrous cycle differences in the acoustic startle reflex (ASR) and its prepulse inhibition (PPI) in humans and animals. However, few have examined the effects of hormone manipulations on these behaviors. This study paired gonadectomy (GDX) in adult male rats with testing for ASR and PPI at 2, 4, 9, 16, 23, 30 and 37 days after surgery. Initial studies of control, GDX and GDX rats given testosterone propionate revealed no group differences in PPI, but did reveal phasic facilitation of the ASR in GDX rats that was greatest on the first and final testing sessions and that was attenuated by testosterone. A second study addressing roles for estrogen and androgen signaling tested new control and GDX rats along with GDX rats given estradiol or the non-aromatizable androgen, 5-alpha-dihydrotestosterone and revealed no group differences in PPI, and increases in ASR in GDX rats that were largest during the first and final testing sessions and that were attenuated by both hormone replacements. However, while responses in GDX rats given testosterone were similar to those of controls, ASR in estradiol- and to a lesser extent in dihydrotestosterone-treated GDX rats were typically lower than in controls. This may suggest that hormone modulation of the ASR requires synergistic estrogen and androgen actions. In the male brain where this can be achieved by local steroid metabolism, the enzymes responsible, e.g., aromatase, could help identify loci in the startle circuitry that may be especially relevant for the hormone modulation observed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2005

Chemosensory anxiety signals augment the startle reflex in humans.

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether chemosensory anxiety signals can activate behavioral withdrawal systems in humans. Twelve male university students donated their axillary sweat in two situations: right before an oral academic examination (anxiety condition) and during ergometric training (exercise condition). Subjective ratings revealed that the odor donors experienced significantly more anxiety and less pleasure during the anxiety condition than during the exercise condition. Seven subjects (three females) participated in the psychophysiological experiment. The chemosensory stimuli from pooled sweat samples of the donors, and from unused cotton pads (pad condition) were presented via a constant-flow olfactometer. Acoustic startle probes (100 dB (A)) were delivered during and between the presentations of the chemosensory stimuli. Only three subjects were able to discriminate the chemosensory stimuli of the human sweat samples from room air. However, the startle reflex amplitude (EMG of the eyeblink response) recorded in the context of chemosensory anxiety signals was increased, as compared to the amplitude recorded in the context of chemosensory stimuli from either exercise (p = 0.018) or cotton pad (p = 0.012). It is concluded that chemosensory anxiety signals may pre-attentively prime defensive behavior.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1981

Effects of melatonin on startle reflex in rat.

In two experiments the effects of melatonin were investigated on the motor, cardiac and emotional components of the startle reflex induced by an intense acoustic stimulus. Melatonin inhibited the motor movements and significantly decreased the HR responses of rats pretested with these procedures. Melatonin decreased the HR responses to stimulation whereas the HR responses of the rats treated with the vehicle solution increased. Melatonin treatment also inhibited the startle-induced defecation compared with the vehicle injection. These findings suggest that melatonin exerts inhibitory effects on the CNS, on sensory reflex and on stress responses.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1994

Effect of corticosterone on the enhancement of the acoustic startle reflex by corticotropin releasing factor (CRF).

The present study evaluated the effects of adrenalectomy and chronic administration of corticosterone on the ability of CRF given intraventricularly to increase the amplitude of the acoustic startle reflex in rats. Experiment 1 showed that CRF-enhanced startle was not affected by adrenalectomy, indicating a central effect independent of the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. In Experiment 2, chronic injection of corticosterone augmented CRF-enhanced startle using a dose of CRF (0.25 micrograms) that normally is ineffective in increasing startle amplitude. Chronic injection of corticosterone by itself did not increase startle amplitude (Experiment 3). We suggest that the potentiation of CRF-enhanced startle by corticosterone may result from an activation of CRF in the central nucleus of the amygdala.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2000

Muscarinic cholinergic modulation of prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonists and agonists on prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex in rats. The muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg) produced a significant dose-dependent decrease in PPI without affecting startle amplitude. In contrast, N-methyl scopolamine, the quaternary analog of scopolamine, had no effect on PPI, indicating that scopolamine disrupted PPI through a central cholinergic mechanism. Two other muscarinic receptor antagonists, trihexyphenidyl (0.3-10 mg/kg) and benztropine (0.03-10 mg/kg), produced significant decreases in PPI similar to scopolamine. On the other hand, the muscarinic receptor antagonists dicyclomine (0.03-10 mg/kg) and biperiden (0.03-10 mg/kg) had no effect on PPI but significantly decreased startle amplitude. Mecamylamine (0.1-10 mg/kg), a nicotinic receptor antagonist, also had no effect on PPI. Administered alone, the muscarinic receptor agonists pilocarpine (0. 03-10 mg/kg), oxotremorine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), RS-86 (0.1-3.0 mg/kg), and arecoline (0.3-10 mg/kg), as well as the cholinesterase inhibitors physostigmine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) and tacrine (0.03-10 mg/kg), had no effect on PPI, but each produced significant decreases in startle amplitude at the highest doses tested. In addition, the disruption of PPI by scopolamine was reversed in a dose-dependent manner by the muscarinic receptor agonist oxotremorine. The present findings demonstrate that the muscarinic cholinergic system plays an important role in the normal mechanisms of PPI.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1994

The acoustic startle reflex in stiff-man syndrome.

We studied the EMG response to loud noise in eight patients with stiff-man syndrome (SMS). Audiogenic muscle jerks originated in the acoustic startle reflex. Patients demonstrated excessive, poorly habituating motor activity predominantly in axial and leg muscles. Exaggerated startle in SMS probably reflects segmental hyperexcitability of axial and lumbar spinal motor neurons.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Anticipation of a non-aversive reaction time task facilitates the blink startle reflex.

The conditions under which blink startle facilitation can be found in anticipation of a reaction time task were investigated to resolve inconsistent findings across previous studies. Four groups of participants (n=64) were presented with two visual stimuli, one predicting a reaction time task (S+) and the second presented alone (S-). Participants were asked to make a speeded response to the offset of the S+ (S1 paradigm) or were asked to respond to a tactile stimulus presented at the offset of the S+ (S1-S2 paradigm). Half of the participants in each paradigm condition received performance feedback. Overall, blink latency shortening and magnitude facilitation were larger during S+ than during S-. More detailed analyses, however, found these differences to be reliable only in the Feedback conditions. Ratings of S+ pleasantness did not change across the experiment. Electrodermal responses to S+ were larger than to S- in all groups with differential electrodermal responding emerging earlier in the S1 paradigm. Taken together, the data support the notion that startle facilitation can occur during non-aversive Pavlovian conditioning.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1979

Modulation of the acoustic startle reflex in humans in the absence of anticipatory changes in the middle ear reflex.

If a weak tone precedes an intense tone, then the acoustic startle eyeblink reflex elicited by the stronger stimulus is inhibited. It has been suggested that the leading stimulus gives rise to a protective middle ear reflex that attenuates the effective intensity of the second. This hypothesis was tested and disproved. In seven subjects intense tone bursts sufficient to elicit both intratympanic and eyeblink responses were presented sometimes alone and sometimes preceded at various lead times (25 to 400 msec) by a weak tone. The weak tone inhibited the amplitude of the eye blink to the strong tone, maximally at intervals of 100 to 200 msec, but was never seen to produce any of the anticipatory impedance changes that would be characteristic of middle ear reflex activity during the interval between the two stimuli.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

The dorsal cochlear nucleus contributes to a high intensity component of the acoustic startle reflex in rats.

The dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) has been shown to project to a region of the nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis (PnC) critical for the evocation of startle in rats, suggesting a possible modulatory influence of the DCN on startle. This study examined the involvement of the DCN in the acoustic startle reflex and various other forms of behavioral plasticity seen with this response. Animals received bilateral electrolytic lesions of the DCN and were tested for acoustic startle responses, background noise facilitation, short-term habituation, prepulse inhibition and facilitation, and fear conditioning. Compared to sham lesioned rats, DCN lesioned rats showed a significant reduction in startle amplitude at the two highest startle-eliciting intensities (110 and 115 dB SPL) and normal responses on all other measures. Hence, the DCN appears to contribute to a high intensity component of the acoustic startle response in rats.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

Lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala, but not the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, block the excitatory effects of corticotropin-releasing factor on the acoustic startle reflex.

Intracerebroventricular (icv) infusion of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) was previously found to produce a long-lasting, dose-dependent (0.1-1.0 microgram) increase in the amplitude of the acoustic startle reflex. The present study sought to determine where in the CNS CRF acts to increase startle. Intracisternal infusion of CRF (0.1-1.0 microgram) increased startle with a time course and magnitude similar to that produced by icv CRF, unlike intrathecal infusion, which produced a small, more rapid enhancement of startle. While lesions of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus had no effect on icv CRF-enhanced startle, bilateral lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala significantly attenuated the excitatory effect of icv CRF but had no effect on intrathecal CRF-enhanced startle. Even though lesions of the amygdala blocked icv CRF-enhanced startle, local infusion of CRF into the amygdala did not significantly elevate startle. The present data indicate that the amygdala is part of the neural circuitry required for icv CRF to elevate startle, but does not appear to be the primary receptor area where CRF acts. The involvement of the amygdala in icv CRF-enhanced startle is consistent with the hypothesis that both the amygdala and CRF are critically involved in fear and stress.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1998

Effect of self-focused attention on the startle reflex, heart rate, and memory performance among socially anxious and nonanxious individuals.

The present study examined the effect of self-focused attention on the startle reflex and heart rate and assessed the assumption that socially anxious individuals become self-focused in evaluative situations. Twenty-five high and 30 low socially anxious men performed a digit recall task under evaluative or nonevaluative instructions. Half of the trials were performed under self-focused conditions and half under non-self-focused conditions. Self-focus led to larger startle responses among socially anxious individuals and had no effect on heart rate. Self-focus combined with evaluation led to poorer recall performance among all subjects. Results provide evidence against a directional change in attention during self-focused attention and favor the view that self-focus increases access to self-relevant thought content and decreases available processing resources.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Lesions of the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus disrupt prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex.

The purpose of the present studies was to determine the effects of bilateral lesions of the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (LDTg) on prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex under conditions of varying prepulse intensity and interstimulus interval (ISI) durations. Rats with bilateral ibotenic acid lesions of the LDTg were evaluated for changes in PPI and startle amplitude in comparison with an unoperated group, sham-LDTg lesioned group and a group with bilateral ibotenic acid lesions of the subcoeruleus nucleus, a brainstem nucleus approximately 1 mm ventrolateral to the LDTg. Bilateral lesions of the LDTg produced a robust decrease in PPI with no effect on startle amplitude as compared with the three control groups. In contrast, bilateral lesions of the subcoeruleus produced no effect on either PPI or startle amplitude. The effects of bilateral lesions of the LDTg on PPI were observed across prepulse intensities of 5, 10 and 15 dB above background and ISI durations of 30, 100, 300 and 1000 ms without significantly decreasing startle amplitude in either test paradigm as compared with the sham-LDTg lesioned group. Our data provide evidence for a role of the LDTg in modulating PPI.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1997

Facilitation and inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in the rat after a momentary increase in background noise level.

Small increments in background noise were shown to increase the amplitude of a subsequently elicited acoustic startle reflex (ASR) in rats by as much as 100% under optimal conditions. Increment lead time (5-160 ms) and level (1.5-15 dB), initial noise level (30-70 dB), startle level (95-125 dB), number of test days (1-5), and drug condition (diazepam or saline ip) were varied in 6 experiments. Prepulse facilitation (PPF), measured by difference scores, was greatest for intermediate increments (3 dB) and lead times (20-40 ms) and was replaced by prepulse inhibition (PPI) for higher values, especially in the later test days. Diazepam reduced baseline ASR and diminished PPI, but it did not affect PPF. These data argue against hypotheses that attribute PPF of this sort to either temporal integration within the ASR pathways or to the elicitation of a nonspecific arousal reaction by the prepulse.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2005

Excision of visual cortex does not affect the facilitatory and inhibitory effects of a light flash prepulse on the acoustic startle reflex in the rat.

We studied the inhibitory (PPI) and facilitatory (PPF) behavioural effects of brief light flashes presented as prepulses just prior to the acoustic startle reflex (ASR) in intact rats and in rats that had a bilateral excision of visual cortex (VC). The VC-lesioned and control groups (n=5, 5) were near identical in PPF for flashes presented 5-20 ms before the ASR and near identical in PPI for flashes presented 60 ms before the ASR. These findings differ from those of a case report of a human patient following occipital cortex resection, for whom light flashes failed to produce either acoustic startle PPF or PPI if the flash were presented to the portion of the visual field in which she could not see; they differ also from data obtained in functionally decorticate rats, for which a light flash produced no startle PPI, but instead a late-appearing exaggerated PPF. In the present experiment the lesion was restricted to VC, while in contrast the occipital resection in the human patient included posterior areas of the parietal and temporal lobe, and functional decortication in the rat disengaged the entire cortex. The greater extent of these two effective surgical procedures may have been responsible for their greater behavioural effects; otherwise, the complete loss of reflex control by photic stimulation in the human patient but not in the rat may reflect the greater functional importance and anatomical complexity of the VC in humans.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2002

Effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics on the prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in patients with schizophrenia.

Patients with schizophrenia show a loss of sensory (motor) gating, which is reflected in a reduced prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex. Furthermore, patients with schizophrenia habituate less than healthy subjects. From previous studies, it is clear that typical antipsychotics have little or no effect on either sensorimotor gating or habituation, while only limited data is available on the effects of atypical antipsychotics on these processes.Forty-four schizophrenic patients (27 stable on typical and 17 stable on atypical antipsychotics) and 35 healthy control subjects were tested in a PPI paradigm. The prepulse and startle stimuli were pure tones of 1500 Hz (duration 40 ms, intensity 80 dB and 110 dB respectively), with a fixed interstimulus interval of 120 milliseconds. Block effects in PPI and startle amplitude to the pulse alone trials (habituation) were analyzed over the three groups, using comedication (i.e., benzodiazepines) as a covariate. Main effect for block was found for startle amplitude (habituation), while main effects for group and block were found for percentage PPI. Further analysis displayed significant differences in PPI between the patients treated with typical antipsychotics and the healthy control group, while patients treated with atypical antipsychotics did not differ from either the healthy control group, or the patients treated with typical antipsychotics. Furthermore, post-hoc division of the patients treated with atypical antipsychotics in patients treated with clozapine and risperidone revealed that this superiority from atypical antipsychotics over typical antipsychotics appeared to be mainly based on the effects of clozapine. Patients with schizophrenia who are treated with atypical antipsychotics appear to have levels of sensorimotor gating that are more consistent with healthy controls than patients who are treated with typical antipsychotics. Furthermore, within the class of atypical antipsychotics, clozapine appears most potent in restoring this process.

Acoustic Stimulation↗