SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reproducibility”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Validity and reproducibility of electrical impedance tomography for measurement of calf blood flow in healthy subjects.

The Sheffield electrical impedance tomography; (EIT) system produces images of changes in the distribution of resistivity within tissue. The paper reports on the application of electrical impedance tomography in monitoring volume changes in the limb during venous occlusion. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility, reproducibility and validity of calf blood flow measurements by EIT. In 14 healthy volunteers calf blood flow is compared, as determined in a calf segment by strain-gauge plethysmography (SGP), with the impedance changes measured by EIT during rest and post-ischaemic hyperaemia. The measurements are repeated to assess reproducibility. The reproducibility for the EIT, assessed from the repeated measurements and expressed as a reproducibility coefficient, is 0.88 during rest and 0.89 during hyperaemia. The reproducibility coefficient for SGP data is 0.83 at rest and 0.67 during hyperaemia. Flow measurements, assessed by means of two methods, correlate well at rest (r = 0.89), but only moderately during hyperaemia (r = 0.51). The correlation coefficient for the pooled flow measurements is 0.98. It is concluded that EIT is a valid and reliable method for assessing blood flow in the limb. Possible applications of EIT in localising fluid changes are discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Image interpretation in CT of laryngeal carcinoma: a study on intra- and interobserver reproducibility.

The object of our study was to evaluate the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the interpretation of CT examinations of laryngeal carcinoma. The CT examinations of 100 laryngeal cancers were retrospectively reviewed twice by two independent reviewers. Involvement of different structures was assessed, using a standard scoring form. Statistical analysis was done using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Cohen's kappa. A borderline significant difference between the observers (p < 0.04) was present. Fair to substantial intraobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.29-0.86), and fair to substantial interobserver reproducibility (average kappa = 0. 26-0.74) were found for most laryngeal structures when a dichotomous categorical scale was used. On the average somewhat lower, but still fair to substantial, intraobserver (kappa = 0.36-0.72), and fair to moderate interobserver (average kappa = 0.29-0.47) reproducibility, were found when a nominal or ordinal categorical scale was used. In conclusion, the interpretation of CT images of laryngeal tumors is reproducible.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed2002

[Reproducibility of measuring retinal nerve fiber density. Comparison of optical coherence tomography with the nerve fiber analyzer and the Heidelberg retinal tomography device].

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is associated with a progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell axons and the evaluation of the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) is important for early diagnosis and follow-up. Results of RNFL thickness measurements may vary according to the devices used. Therefore, the present study has analysed and compared the reproducibility of data obtained with three different instruments. METHODS: RNFL thickness was determined using a circular identification line around the optic nerve head by optical coherence tomography (OCT), a Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) and a Nerve Fiber Analyser (NFA). Each eye was tested six times. The values for RNFL thickness were calculated for the superior, inferior, nasal and temporal areas. A one-way analysis of variance with random effects was chosen to estimate the variance components. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as a measure of reliability and the coefficient of variation (CV%) as a measure of precision were determined to estimate the reproducibility of RNFL thickness measurements. RESULTS: With all three instruments, the reproducibility of measurements between the superior, inferior, temporal and nasal areas did not differ significantly suggesting that reproducibility does not depend on the thickness of the RNFL. Data obtained by NFA showed the highest ICC values (0.9) and lowest CV% values (7.0), followed by those obtained by HRT (reliability ICC 0.8; precision CV% 12). A markedly lower degree of reproducibility was found for the OCT compared to NFA and HRT (reliability ICC 0.5; precision CV% 15). CONCLUSION: The comparison of RNFL thickness measurements with OCT, NFA, and HRT showed that the NFA yielded the most reliable results followed by HRT.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

[Reproducibility of the pattern electroretinogram].

The pattern ERG (PERG) is used as an indicator of retinal ganglion cell function. Up to now, reports on the reproducibility of the PERG have been contradictory. We investigated the reproducibility under the conditions of the forthcoming ISCEV guidelines for the PERG. We simultaneously recorded the PERG and VEP in 42 eyes of 21 subjects to phase-reversing checkerboard stimuli with DTL electrodes. Both transient (2 rps) and steady-state (16 rps) stimulation was employed. The check sizes were 0.4 degree, 0.8 degree and 16 degrees, the mean luminance 45 cd/m2, the contrast 98%, and the field size 32 degrees x 27 degrees. Measurements were repeated at the same time of day after 1 week. In addition, we compared two different electrode positions in 16 eyes: (1) across the cornea along the lower lid; and deep in the conjunctival sac. With position (1) the amplitudes were found to be higher by 20% than (2). We calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of amplitude as a measure of reproducibility. CV was 7 +/- 1% for the steady-state PERG, 9 +/- 1% for the transient PERG, 12 +/- 2% for the steady-state VEP and 14 +/- 3% for the transient VEP. For the latency of the PERG, the intersession CV was found to be 1.5%. Amplitude reproducibility was somewhat higher under steady-state as compared to transient stimulation; we attribute this to the high noise rejection of the Fourier analysis. Altogether, the amplitude reproducibility of the PERG is somewhat higher than that of the VEP.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

A prospective evaluation of the immediate reproducibility of the signal-averaged ECG.

The purpose of this investigation was to prospectively evaluate the immediate reproducibility of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG). A total of 114 patients undergoing evaluation for ventricular arrhythmias were enrolled in this protocol. Two consecutive SAECG's (40 Hz bidirectional high-pass filtering with a computer-automated system) were performed 10 minutes apart. Abnormal SAECG parameters were defined as (1) vector QRS duration more than 120 msec, (2) terminal root mean square (RMS) voltage less than 20 microV, and (3) low-amplitude signal (LAS) duration more than 40 msec. An SAECG was defined as abnormal if at least one vector parameter was abnormal. There was close correlation between vector parameters during the two SAECG observations: QRS duration had the highest reproducibility (r2 = 0.97, p less than 0.001) followed by terminal RMS voltage (r2 = 0.92, p less than 0.001), and LAS duration (r2 = 0.90, p less than 0.001). The mean (+/- SD) percentage of change between the two recordings was 2% +/- 2% of the QRS duration, 13% +/- 22% for terminal RMS voltage, and 7% +/- 11% for LAS duration. The reproducibility of an initially normal SAECG was 92% and of an initially abnormal SAECG, 96%. Seventeen patients (15%) had a change in one of the three vector parameters between the two recordings. There were no clinically significant differences between the 17 patients in whom the SAECG was nonreproducible and the 97 patients in whom the SAECG was reproducible. However, reproducibility was significantly higher in patients with an initially normal versus an initially abnormal SAECG (92% vs 76%, p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

PubMed1989

Reproducibility of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmia in patients undergoing evaluation for malignant ventricular arrhythmia.

In patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmia, the utility of exercise testing for exposing arrhythmias and guiding antiarrhythmic drug selection and dosage is not yet generally accepted. A major reservation relates to the issue of reproducibility of arrhythmia provocation. This prospective study comprised 28 patients referred for evaluation of ventricular arrhythmia. In half of these subjects the clinical arrhythmia was sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Maximal exercise testing adhering to a Bruce protocol was performed on 2 separate days. No antiarrhythmic drugs were administered at the time of testing. Of the 28 patients, 27 had an increase in arrhythmia with exercise. The prevalence rates of arrhythmia were greater than 80% and did not significantly differ between test 1 and test 2. Excluding infrequent single ventricular premature complexes, the reproducibility of a test with positive outcome was 76%. Similarly, test-retest agreement, a bidirectional measure of reproducibility, was greater than 74%. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.26 to 0.36 for all grades of arrhythmia, indicating that reproducibility was consistently greater than by chance alone. Linear regression analysis of arrhythmia frequency in the 2 tests yielded R values of 0.76 to 0.96 and slopes of 0.82 to 1.2. No patient had enough spontaneous variability in repetitive forms to suggest spurious efficacy or aggravation. For ventricular premature complexes there was an 8 to 14% incidence of spurious efficacy and a 4 to 7% incidence of spurious aggravation. These results suggest that exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmia is sufficiently reproducible to serve as an adjunct method in the evaluation and management of patients with potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Short- and long-term reproducibility of time and frequency domain heart rate variability measurements in normal subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain data relating to the reproducibility of the time and frequency domain measurements obtained from 10-min ECG recordings. METHODS: Eighteen normal volunteers underwent evaluations of time and frequency domain heart rate variability 2 weeks and 7 months after baseline analysis. The time domain parameters were mean NN, the standard deviation of NN intervals, the percentage of successive NN intervals > 50 ms and the root mean square successive difference of NN intervals. The frequency domain evaluations (total power, low frequency, and high frequency) were made by means of both the Fast Fourier Transform algorithm (FFT) and the autoregressive method (AR) from 10-min ECG recordings made under three different conditions: rest, controlled respiration, and after a passive head-up tilt test. Reproducibility was evaluated by means of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), comparing baseline values with the results obtained at the second week and the seventh month. Time domain evaluation were also made from 10-min ECG. RESULTS: All of the time domain measurements had an ICC > or = 0.75, except for the standard deviation of NN intervals, which had an ICC of 0.57. The frequency domain parameters obtained by means of either FFT or AR showed similar reproducibility. Low frequency was reproducible under all three conditions, total power only at rest, and high frequency only during controlled respiration. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of frequency domain parameters depends on the analysed condition. These results are of primary importance when the effects of drugs or other interventions on heart rate variability are under investigation.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Variation in late potentials and the reproducibility of their measurement.

The usefulness of a test depends on its reproducibility. This determines how closely the test result indicates the actual pathophysiologic state, how well it will predict that state in the future, and if interventions or further pathologic changes are reflected by the test. There is a variation in the parameters of the signal-averaged ECG, more so with spectral than with time domain measurements. These must be accounted for when estimating risk. If one presumes that risk is proportional to the extent of abnormality, then the variation in measurements simply means that only borderline cases can potentially be miscategorized. More important, the lack of reproducibility of measurements made from the signal-averaged ECG indicates that changes noted in an individual after an intervention, such as a surgical intervention, must be viewed with a jaundiced eye. Group changes are perhaps meaningful, and indicate a physiologic effect, but clinical decisions cannot be made unless the changes observed in an individual patient exceed the confidence limits of expected variation. There has been debate as to the usefulness of measurements made from the signal-averaged ECG in predicting antiarrhythmic drug effects (the effect of drugs is discussed elsewhere in this symposium). Here an analogy must be made to the suppression of asymptomatic ventricular ectopy. First, we cannot make a statement that there has been a drug effect unless the parameter measured changes beyond the confidence limits of normal variation or reproducibility. Second, we cannot translate a change in a measurement into a change in risk for arrhythmic events without subjecting that hypothesized relationship to a long-term placebo-controlled clinical trial, albeit acute electrophysiologic trials correlating changes in the signal-averaged ECG to ventricular tachycardia induction provide some insight. And perhaps the relationship must be tested independently for each drug assessed. In the same regard, there is much excitement about the benefits of thrombolytic therapy, but when diagnosing benefit to the individual patient we have to remember the lack of reproducibility of the measurements and also keep in mind that an improved signal-averaged ECG cannot be translated into an improved prognosis without long-term controlled studies. In summarizing the variation and reproducibility of measurements made from the signal-averaged ECG we avoided providing more than a sense of the extent of variation expected because precise confidence intervals depend on the particular techniques used to make the measurements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1990

Day to day reproducibility of electrically inducible ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Day to day reproducibility of the response to programmed ventricular stimulation has not been evaluated in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed prospectively on 2 consecutive days in 56 patients on an average of 12 +/- 5 days (range 7 to 29) after an acute myocardial infarction. No patient had a history of documented or suspected sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation occurring greater than 48 h after infarction. During initial programmed ventricular stimulation, 21 patients had induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (Group I), and 35 patients had induction of either nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or no ventricular tachycardia (Group II). Repeat programmed ventricular stimulation in Group I patients induced sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in 16 of 21 patients (reproducibility 76%); the maximal induced response in the other 5 patients was nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 2 patients and fewer than six repetitive ventricular responses in 3 patients. The day to day reproducibility was significantly higher for inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia of cycle length greater than or equal to 240 ms compared with rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia of cycle length less than 240 ms (100% versus 44%, p less than 0.009) or ventricular fibrillation (100% versus 43%, p less than 0.009). Repeat programmed ventricular stimulation in Group II patients did not induce sustained ventricular arrhythmias in 31 of 35 patients (reproducibility 89%). Thus, in survivors of acute myocardial infarction, inducible slow sustained ventricular tachycardia was a highly reproducible finding, whereas inducibility of rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation showed a significant day to day variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Immediate reproducibility of electrically induced sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia before and during antiarrhythmic therapy.

The immediate reproducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia induction was evaluated prospectively during 106 studies performed in 53 patients with clinical sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Programmed electrical stimulation was performed twice, using the same protocol during 53 drug-free studies and 53 subsequent studies on antiarrhythmic therapy. Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was reproduced in 104 (98%) of the 106 studies. There was no significant difference in the incidence of reproducible tachycardia in the drug-free state compared with that observed during treatment with different classes of antiarrhythmic drugs. An increase in the number of extrastimuli was required to reinitiate the tachycardia in 9 (11%) of 83 studies in which single or double extrastimuli were initially required to induce the tachycardia. In 39 (37%) of 104 studies with reproducible tachycardia induction, the two tachycardias significantly differed in electrocardiographic (ECG) configuration and cycle length. These observations suggest that the overall reproducibility of ventricular tachycardia induction is sufficiently high to provide a reliable marker for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. However, specific tachycardia characteristics such as cycle length and ECG configuration are more variable even within the same study and may be less useful in assessing the effects of subsequent interventions.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

PubMed1990

Characteristics of individuals and long term reproducibility of dietary reports: the Tecumseh Diet Methodology Study.

Food frequency reports in 1967-1969 were compared to frequency reports of the same foods asked retrospectively in 1982-1983 and 1967-1969 for 1184 respondents aged 45-64 years in the Tecumseh Community Health Study. The kappa statistic for concordance of the retrospective and baseline reports was used as a summary measure of the individual's ability to reproduce his or her earlier diet report. Reproducibility was estimated for total diet, represented by 83 foods, and for 9 subsets of foods of epidemiologic interest. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, reproducibility was strongly related to stability of diet; those whose diets changed least over the 15-year period had greatest diet reproducibility. Greater total diet reproducibility was also found among men with higher education, among women of less than 110% desirable weight reporting no special diet and among women reporting no medications. Consistent with current models of memory, the retrospective report of diet was strongly related to the current report of diet. Agreement between the retrospective and baseline diet reports was greater than agreement between the current and baseline diet reports. This indicates that, as a proxy for past diet, the retrospective report of diet is superior to the current report. Similar relationships were found for the 9 subset of foods.

Body Weight↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy.

Fast breath-hold cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) shows excellent results for interstudy reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) volumes, ejection fraction, and mass, which are thought to be superior to results of 2-dimensional echocardiography. However, there is no direct comparison of the interstudy reproducibility of both methods in the same subjects. A total of 60 subjects (normal volunteers [n = 20], or patients with heart failure [n = 20] or LV hypertrophy [n = 20]) underwent 2 CMRs and 2 echocardiographic studies for assessment of LV volumes, function, and mass. The interstudy reproducibility coefficient of variability was superior for CMR in all groups for all parameters. Statistical significance was reached for end-systolic volume (4.4% to 9.2% vs 13.7% to 20.3%, p <0.001), ejection fraction (2.4% to 7.3% vs 8.6% to 19.4%, p <0.001), and mass (2.8% to 4.8% vs 11.6% to 15.7% p <0.001), with a trend for end-diastolic volume (2.9% to 4.9% vs 5.5% to 10.5%, p = 0.17). The superior interstudy reproducibility resulted in considerably lower calculated sample sizes (reductions of 55% to 93%) required by CMR compared with echocardiography to show clinically relevant changes in LV dimensions and function. Thus, CMR has excellent interstudy reproducibility in normal, dilated, and hypertrophic hearts, and is superior to 2-dimensional echocardiography.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Reproducibility of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in patients with unexplained syncope.

Head-up tilt testing (HUTT) potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin has gained acceptance as means of diagnosing neurally mediated syncope. To evaluate the reproducibility of HUTT potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin, 48 patients with unexplained syncope prospectively underwent 2 consecutive tests 1 to 28 days apart. The initial test ended in syncope in 34 patients (71%). In 9 patients (19%) the test was positive during the drug-free phase, whereas 25 patients (52%) had syncope after nitroglycerin administration. Of these 34 patients with an initial positive test result, 27 (79%) had a reproducible outcome on repeat testing. Of 12 patients (25%) with an initial negative test result, 10 (83%) had a reproducible outcome on repeat testing. Of 2 patients (4%) with a first test ending in exaggerated response, both had a negative repeat test response. The overall reproducibility of sublingual nitroglycerin tilt-table testing was 77%. In a group of 23 patients with both positive tests, 19 (83%) had the same response modality (2 vasodepressor, 4 cardioinhibitory, 13 mixed response). In the same group of patients, individual trough heart rates correlated well with each other between tests. Finally, in the 27 patients with both positive tests, intrapatient time of onset of symptoms did not significantly correlate between tests. Thus, in patients with syncope of unknown origin, HUTT potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin provides an adequate reproducibility when repeated on different days.

Administration, Sublingual↗

PubMed1994

Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation by dynamics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy is a laser-based image acquisition technique, which greatly improves the quality of the examination of the fundus and the retinal nerve fiber layer. To assess retinal nerve fiber layer imaging by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility in the classification of retinal nerve fiber layer defects, three independent observers evaluated on two separate occasions the videotaped images of 150 eyes of 80 consecutive patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Ophthalmoscopy was performed using argon blue light (488 nm), confocal apertures of 3 to 1 mm, and 40-degree and 20-degree field angles. Of 150 eyes, 20 (13.3%) were excluded from the study because of the poor quality of the images (clinically significant cataract or myopic peripapillary atrophy). The retinal nerve fiber layer was evaluated qualitatively according to a standard classification: normal pattern, slit, wedge, and diffuse defects. Intraobserver reproducibility, evaluated by kappa statistic, was excellent (> or = 0.75): observer A = 0.78 (95% confidence limits, 0.67-0.88); observer B = 0.84 (95% confidence limits, 0.72-0.96); and observer C = 0.79 (95% confidence limits, 0.67-0.91). Interobserver reproducibility was also excellent in all cases: observers A-B = 0.84 (95% confidence limits, 0.71-0.98); observers A-C = 0.76 (95% confidence limits, 0.65-0.87); and observers B-C = 0.80 (95% confidence limits, 0.69-0.92). Kappa values ranged between 0.59 and 0.69 for intraobserver reproducibility and between 0.55 and 0.69 for interobserver reproducibility when using only those eyes in which abnormalities were noted by at least one observer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Observer variation and reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasonography.

To investigate interobserver variation and reproducibility of endosonographic findings, both experienced and inexperienced endosonographers evaluated depth of tumor invasion (T stage) and presence of lymph node metastasis (N stage) in 50 patients with nonobstructing esophageal carcinoma. Results were compared with the findings by surgical pathology of the resected specimens. The kappa statistic (kappa) was used to assess interobserver and intraobserver agreement and consistency of accurate interpretation (reproducibility) for the two groups. Agreement between the experienced endosonographers was excellent (kappa = > .75) for T1 and T4 lesions, good (kappa = .61) for T3 lesions, but only poor (kappa = > .46) for T2 lesions. The overall agreement between the experienced endosonographers was equally good for both T and N stages. Agreement between the inexperienced endosonographers was poor for all T stages but was good for lymph node metastasis (kappa = .52). For experienced endosonographers, endosonographic reproducibility of histologically confirmed T4 lesions was excellent, followed closely by T3 and T2 lesions; T1 tumors were frequently interpreted differently by the same endosonographer. Reproducibility of N stage determinations was excellent for N0 lymph nodes and good for N1 nodes. Thus, for experienced endosonographers, interobserver agreement was excellent for all T stages except T2, whereas reproducibility of determination of depth of tumor invasion was good to excellent for T2, T3, and T4 lesions but poor for T1 lesions. As yet poorly defined operator and machine-dependent factors that cause misinterpretation of T1 and T2 tumors will require additional study.

Endoscopy↗

PubMed1995

Clinical study of location and reproducibility of three mandibular positions in relation to body posture and muscle function.

Clinical studies have confirmed the adequate reproducibility of both centric occlusion and centric relation when used as reference positions during treatment; however, the reproducibility of the neuromuscular position has been found inadequate. This study evaluated the location and reproducibility of these three mandibular positions in relation to body posture, sitting and supine, and bilateral muscle activity before and after the insertion of a flat mandibular positioning device equilibrated to balance the muscle functions, as shown by two electromyography biofeedback instruments. Intraoral recordings were made in 11 young subjects with complete natural dentition. Acrylic resin clutches that supported a screw point in the maxillary arch and painted glass in the mandibular arch were used and positioned not to interfere with the occlusion. The distances of the screw scratch from two of the edges of the painted glass were used to measure the anteroposterior and mediolateral locations with a micrometer. The reproducibility was evaluated by measuring the scratch surface by measuring the weight of the print cutouts made from photographs of the scratches taken with a stereoscope. The location and reproducibility of centric occlusion and centric relation were not affected by body posture. A more precise posterior neuromuscular position was obtained in the supine position. The insertion of a mandibular positioning device did not affect centric occlusion but gave a more precise centric relation. Neuromuscular position became as precise as centric occlusion and was located anteroposteriorly between centric occlusion and centric relation.

Acrylic Resins↗

PubMed1996

Reproducibility and condylar position of a physiologic maxillomandibular centric relation in upright and supine body position.

Better understanding of the physiologic features of the masticatory system has led to the evolution of the concept of maxillomandibular centric relation from the mechanical to physiological bases. However, the reproducibility of physiologic methods for centric relation determination has been criticized. In this clinical study the swallowing technique was modified to establish a physiologic centric relation in a reproducible manner. Condylar and disk positioning and reproducibility of the proposed modified swallowing technique (MST) were compared with the same parameters of a traditional technique, namely, the chin point guidance technique (CGT). Both techniques were studied with the patient in the upright and supine positions. Three interocclusal records were obtained for each technique-position combination for each of the 30 patients. The recorded maxillomandibular relations were analyzed on the three-dimensional analyzer. MST positioned the condyles in a more superoanterior position than did CGT, which was interpreted as a better seating of the condyles and disk in the articular fossae. There was no significant difference in reproducibility between MST and CGT on x, y, or z axes (p > 0.05), indicating that it is possible to establish a physiologic centric relation in a reproducible manner. The term "functional centric area" was proposed in this study to define a neuromuscularly determined centric occlusal scheme.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Reproducibility in monitoring nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity.

The evaluation of sexual dysfunction has improved with the advent of methods to test nocturnal penile tumescence that also monitor penile rigidity. Earlier techniques may not have recorded abnormal rigidity despite normal tumescence. To test the reproducibility of penile tumescence and rigidity, the results of initial and repeat tracings performed a mean of 39 days apart were compared in 17 patients (median age 62 years). Three nocturnal patterns were identified. 1) Among the 17 patients the initial penile tumescence and rigidity pattern was reproduced on repeat testing in 15. 2) Patterns that were not reproduced in the other 2 patients were explained by the ingestion of alcohol or because of a febrile illness during the period monitored. 3) Nocturnal penile rigidity and tumescence tracings from these patients reproduced previous patterns. Monitoring of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity is a useful and reproducible tool in the evaluation of male sexual dysfunction.

Adult↗